A Conceptual Framework for AI-Assisted Problem-Based Learning in Law Courses for Business Students: Integrating Generative AI and IRAC for Legal Reasoning
Authors
Faculty of Business, UNITAR University College Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business, UNITAR University College Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100801152
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 16819-16837
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-09
Accepted: 2026-09-14
Published: 2026-09-26
Abstract
This conceptual paper aims to develop and explain an AI-Assisted Problem-Based Learning (AI-PBL) framework that integrates Problem-Based Learning (PBL), generative artificial intelligence (AI), and the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion) approach for teaching and learning in law-related courses within business degree programmes. The framework draws on the established learning potential of PBL, the structured reasoning function of IRAC, and the emerging educational role of generative AI to propose an integrated process for authentic legal problem-solving.
Keywords: Generative artificial intelligence (AI); problem-based learning (PBL); legal reasoning; AI literacy; business education.
Keywords
Generative artificial intelligence (AI), problem-based learning (PBL), legal reasoning, AI literacy, business education.
Downloads
References
1. Anggraeni, D. M., Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Shofiyah, N., & Jatmiko, B. (2023). Systematic review of problem-based learning research in fostering critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101334 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bacalso, F. D., Villamor, F. E., Paclipan, C. P., Orquia, C. J. B., Rendon, I. P., Albiso, A. T., & Himang, C. M. (2026). Institutional approaches to generative AI management in higher education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1814426. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1814426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Burton, K. (2016). Teaching and assessing problem solving: An example of an incremental approach to using IRAC in legal education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.13.5.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Burton, K. (2017). “Think like a lawyer” using a legal reasoning grid and criterion-referenced assessment rubric on IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion). Journal of Learning Design, 10(2), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v10i2.229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Francis, N. J., Jones, S., & Smith, D. P. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Balancing innovation and integrity. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 81, 14048. https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Guo, Q., Jamil, H., Ismail, L., Luo, S., & Sun, Z. (2024). Effects of problem-based learning on EFL learning: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 19(12), e0307819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Koçoğlu, A., & Kanadlı, S. (2025). The effect of problem-based learning approach on learning outcomes: A second-order meta-analysis study. Educational Research Review, 48, Article 100690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100690 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kraal, D., & Coleman, A. (2019). Teaching legal studies in business degrees: A review of a method and its practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(11), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2019v44.n11.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Liu, Y., & Pásztor, A. (2022). Effects of problem-based learning instructional intervention on critical thinking in higher education: A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Munir, B. (2025). Integrating generative AI in legal pedagogy: A case study. International Journal of Legal Information, 53(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1017/jli.2025.10081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Oliveira, H., Sanches, T., & Martins, J. (2022). Problem-based learning in a flipped classroom: A case study for active learning in legal education in international law. The Law Teacher, 56(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2022.2040934 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Peoples, L. F. (2025). Artificial intelligence and legal analysis: Implications for legal education and the profession. Law Library Journal, 117(1), 52–85. https://www.aallnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/LLJ-Vol-117_No-1_2025-FINAL.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Sozon, M., Parnther, C., Wong, W. L., & Chowdhury, M. A. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Navigating benefits and challenges in the technological era. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2025-0103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Yu, L., & Zin, Z. M. (2023). The critical thinking-oriented adaptations of problem-based learning models: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1139987. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1139987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study