Reforming Tertiary Examination Systems in Bangladesh: Towards a Competency-Based, Inclusive, and Equitable Future

A remarkable change in Bangladesh’s tertiary examination system is now in urgent demand. Competency, Inclusivity, and Equity are essential elements in education and are required to be applied today. By considering all these factors, the article analyses the assessment context of higher education in Bangladesh, noting misalignment with global standards, issues with assessment design, and policy weaknesses. Based on a mixed-methods approach in a range of institutions, the study identifies underlying faults, such as out-of-date exam formats and inconsistent pedagogical applications, and provides recommendations drawing on global best practice and constructivist theory. There is a vision for a four-stranded reform architecture, with policy, pedagogy, infrastructure, and teacher professional development to create an equitable competency-based system of assessment. This paper contributes to the existing body of knowledge on education reform within developing contexts by offering a data-driven and scalable pathway towards system change in assessment.

Tertiary Education in Bangladesh, Examination Reform, Competency-Based Assessment

1. Rahman, Md. M., et al. (2016). Impact of the examination system on the teaching and learning of English at the higher secondary level in Bangladesh. Journal of Jessore University of Science and Technology, 1(1), 80–89. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325734262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Rami, Z. (2024). An Evaluation of Examination System at Tertiary Level: An Empirical Case Study in Bangladesh. Aligarh Muslim University ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. 31639499. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Kabir, M. H. (2016). Managing curricular innovation and teacher training: Bangladesh perspective. IIUC Studies, 12, 9–26. https://doi.org/10.3329/iiucs.v12i0.30578 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Sarkar, S.H., & Hossain, S.Z. (2018). Higher education systems and institutions, Bangladesh. In Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_499-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Rami, Z., Bhan, A., Vijoy, P., Bijale, M., Sharma, V. (2024). Mapping Holistic Growth: Developing a Comprehensive Student Development Scale. European Economic Letters (EEL), 14(3), 793–799. Retrieved from https://www.eelet.org.uk/index.php/journal/article/view/1830 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bryan, C., & Clegg, K. (2019). Innovative Assessment in Higher Education: A Handbook for Academic Practitioners (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429506857 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mohsin, M., & Kamal, M. A. (2012). Managing quality higher education in Bangladesh: Lessons from the Singaporean and Malaysian strategies and reforms. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(20), 59. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n20p59 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sultana, S., Roshid, M., Haider, M., Kabir, M., & Khan, M. (Eds.) (2020). Assessment and Testing in ELT. The Routledge handbook of English language education in Bangladesh. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Handbook-of-English-Language-Education-in-Bangladesh/Sultana-Roshid-Haider-Kabir-Khan/p/book/9780367610654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ray, S., Ngomba, R.T., Ahmed S.I. (2022). The impact of assessment and feedback practice on the student learning experiences in higher education. Essays Biochem, 66(1), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20210056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rami, Z. ., Hassan, D. M. K. ., & Shatnawi, H. (2023). Pedagogy of Communicative and Technical English for Engineering Students at Tertiary Level: A Case Study in Bangladesh. Migration Letters, 20(S8), 1557–1575. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20iS8.6429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L., (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications, 3, pp.520. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.bd/books/about/Designing_and_Conducting_Mixed_Method [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Xu, Y. (2019). English Language Teacher Assessment Literacy in Practice. In: Gao, X. (eds) Second Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_22-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Davies, A., Herbst, S., Sherman, A. (2016). Assessment for Learning: A Framework for Educators’ Professional Growth and Evaluation Cycles. In: Laveault, D., Allal, L. (eds) Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211 0_14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hassan, D. M. K. ., & Rami, Z. (2024). Exploring Nuances in Second Language Acquisition: An Error Analysis Perspective . Migration Letters, 21(4), 294–298. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v21i4.7319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study