The Influence of Social Relationships and Community Dynamics on Crop Insurance Adoption in Magu District, Mwanza, Tanzania

Authors

Nicholaus Kemba Francis

Department of Sociology St. Augustine University of Tanzania (Tanzania)

Patrick Masanja

Department of Sociology St. Augustine University of Tanzania (Tanzania)

Francis F Lyimo

Department of Sociology St. Augustine University of Tanzania (Tanzania)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000446

Subject Category: Sociology

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 5457-5463

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-20

Accepted: 2025-10-28

Published: 2025-11-15

Abstract

Despite the recognized importance of crop insurance as a strategy for managing agricultural risks, its adoption among smallholder farmers in Tanzania remains remarkably low. In Magu District, for instance, only about 7.8% of farmers participate in crop insurance programs despite facing recurrent threats such as droughts, floods, and pest infestations. This study explored the influence of social relationships and community dynamics on crop insurance adoption among smallholder farmers in Magu District, Mwanza, Tanzania. Employing a qualitative research approach, the study focuses on the lived experiences of twelve farmers selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews, analyzed thematically to understand socio-cultural barriers influencing crop insurance uptake. The findings reveal that farming decisions are heavily influenced by consultation networks, where farmers seek advice from peers and community leaders. Despite the reliance on these social structures, skepticism towards crop insurance prevails, largely due to inconsistent messaging from community leaders and the perpetuation of negative narratives within social circles. Notably, social pressures, particularly from women and older generations, discourage individuals from exploring insurance options, framing it as unnecessary or exploitative. The study underscores that the credibility of community intermediaries and the cultural context significantly shape farmers' perceptions and acceptance of crop insurance. Recommendations emphasize enhancing community engagement through consistent communication, education initiatives, and leveraging peer testimonials to foster trust and mitigate skepticism. Overall, the study highlights the complexity of social dynamics in agricultural decision-making, suggesting that effective strategies for promoting crop insurance must address these collective influences to improve adoption rates among smallholder farmers.

Keywords

Despite the recognized importance of crop insurance

Downloads

References

1. Berhane, G., Clarke, D., Dercon, S., & Vargas Hill, R. (2015). Can insurance help manage climate risk and food insecurity? Evidence from Ethiopia. International Food Policy Research Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. FAO. (2019). Scaling up agricultural insurance in Tanzania: Gaps, challenges, and opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Haule, K., & Katundu, J. (2021). Barriers to agricultural insurance uptake among smallholder farmers in rural Tanzania. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 9(2), 112–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kimaro, A., Mwakalobo, A., & Mhando, D. (2021). Challenges and prospects of agricultural insurance for smallholder farmers in Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Mdoe, N., Mkenda, A., & Mwanga, J. (2021). Socio-cultural influences on agricultural insurance uptake among smallholder farmers in Tanzania. Journal of Rural Development, 39(2), 115–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mwakalobo, A. B. S., & Kayunze, K. A. (2019). Institutional factors influencing crop insurance uptake in Tanzania: A case of Magu District. Journal of Rural Development, 34(1), 67–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Nshakira, N., et al. (2021). Determinants of uptake and strategies to improve agricultural insurance in Africa. Journal of Agricultural Science, 12(5), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. URT (United Republic of Tanzania). (2020). National Agricultural Insurance Scheme Implementation Framework. Ministry of Agriculture, Tanzania. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Yarumba, P., et al. (2024). Trust and mistrust in agricultural insurance: Evidence from rural Tanzania. Development Policy Review, 42(2), 211–229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles