Assessment of Public Secondary School Principals’ Management Functions and Student Services in the Division of Romblon: Basis for a Management Handbook
Authors
Rev. Jose D. Falogme, Jr. Ph.D, LPT, RGC
Epiphany School of Peace and Goodwill -IFI Learning Institution, Inc. (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900128
Subject Category: Educational Management
Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 1813-1815
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-16
Accepted: 2026-09-21
Published: 2026-10-03
Abstract
This study assessed the status of student services and the level of management functions of public secondary school principals in the Division of Romblon during the academic year 2009–2010, establishing an empirical basis for a validated school management handbook. Utilizing a descriptive-normative and correlational research design, data were gathered using a validated survey questionnaire administered to 178 stratified respondents, comprising classroom teachers, principals, education program supervisors, and students. To control for self-report bias, multi-rater perspectives were integrated and triangulated across groups. Statistical treatments included frequency counts, weighted means, one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and Pearson Product- Moment Correlation.
Keywords
Management Functions, Student Services, Educational Administration, Principal Leadership
Downloads
References
1. Adoption of the Validated Management Handbook: School principals should adopt the newly structured management handbook to systematically address operational gaps, particularly in safety, security, and library services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Systematic Handbook Validation Cycle: Future institutionalization of administrative toolkits must strictly adhere to a four-phase model: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. a. Stage 1 (Gap Extraction): Pinpointing specific vulnerabilities from empirical assessments; [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. b. Stage 2 (Drafting): Creating contextualized guidance modules tailored to public secondary schools; [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. c. Stage 3 (Expert Review): Submitting drafts to Division supervisors and educational management experts for content validation using standardized validation rubrics; and [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. d. Stage 4 (Refinement): Finalizing usability features based on pilot feedback. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Enhanced Multi-Rater Evaluation and Monitoring: Principals must establish periodic, multi- stakeholder feedback systems involving teachers, staff, and students rather than relying purely on administrative self-evaluations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Program-Based Budgeting and Supervisory Oversight: Educational leaders should transition toward transparent, program-based budgeting to ensure dedicated yearly allocations for every student service component, integrated into regular Division monitoring reports. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Administrative Support as a Predictor of Teacher Retention and Organizational Commitment: A Case Study of Junior High Teachers
- No Place for Play-Ful Learning in Higher Education: An Interdisciplinary Critical Evaluation (2015–2025)
- Unmasking Colonial Legacies in Zambian Education: A Philosophical and Historical Critique of the Secondary School Curriculum
- Improving Students' Collaboration and Communication Skills through Project-Based Digital Learning in Plantation and Herbal
- Public Primary School Teacher Preparedness on CBC Adoption in Township Ward, Garissa County, Kenya