Bar Model Scaffolding for Percentage Word Problems in a Year Five Classroom

Authors

Hartini Ismail

Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak (Malaysia)

Mohd Azarul Mohd Mokhtar

Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak (Malaysia)

Haryati Ismail

Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, IPG Kampus Kota Bharu, Kelantan (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0606

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 8219-8227

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-17

Accepted: 2026-09-22

Published: 2026-10-05

Abstract

Many primary pupils can carry out a calculation but still struggle to turn a word problem into a useful mathematical representation. This paper revisits a small classroom intervention in which nine Year Five pupils from a public primary school in Sarawak, Malaysia, learned to use bar models for percentage problems. Over eight one-hour sessions, pupils identified the whole and the relevant part, drew and labelled a segmented bar, translated the relationship into a calculation, and checked whether the answer made sense. The class mean rose from 31.48 (SD = 5.55) on the pretest to 94.44 (SD = 8.34) on the posttest, and the median rose from 33.33 to 100.00. All nine pupils improved. Both the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the exact sign test indicated a clear pre-post shift (W = 0, exact p = .0039). Every score moved from 33.33% or below at pretest to 83.33% or above at posttest. To make sense of this pattern, we introduce the Verbal-Visual-Symbolic Representation Bridge, which describes how pupils may move from understanding the problem, to constructing a diagram, to writing a mathematical expression, and finally to checking the result. The framework is offered as an interpretation of the teaching process, not as a tested causal model. The findings must also be read in light of the small sample, lack of a comparison group, limited information about the tests, and a marked ceiling effect at posttest. Even with these constraints, the study shows the value of examining each pupil’s score pattern rather than relying only on a class mean. It also illustrates how the assessment itself can shape what can reasonably be claimed about learning.

Keywords

bar model, percentage, primary mathematics, representational scaffolding, word-problem solving

Downloads

References

1. Abdul Gani, M., Tengah, K. A., & Said, H. (2019). Bar model as intervention in solving word problem involving percentage. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 3(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v3i1.11093 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Beckmann, S. (2004). Solving algebra and other story problems with simple diagrams: A method demonstrated in grade 4–6 texts used in Singapore. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 42–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. de Koning, B. B., Boonen, A. J. H., Jongerling, J., van Wesel, F., & van der Schoot, M. (2022). Model method drawing acts as a double-edged sword for solving inconsistent word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10150-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.684 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ismail, H., & Maat, S. M. (2016). Keberkesanan model bar dalam penyelesaian masalah matematik berayat murid Tahun Lima. In E-Proceedings of the International Conference on Education 2016 (ICE2016) (pp. 496–502). Sarawak Association for Development of Professionalism in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Morin, L. L., Watson, S. M. R., Hester, P., & Raver, S. A. (2017). The use of a bar model drawing to teach word problem solving to students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717690116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Vessonen, T., Dahlberg, M., Hellstrand, H., Widlund, A., Söderberg, P., Korhonen, J., Aunio, P., & Laine, A. (2024). Task characteristics associated with mathematical word problem-solving performance among elementary school-aged children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09954-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Vessonen, T., Hellstrand, H., Kurkela, M., Aunio, P., & Laine, A. (2025). The effectiveness of mathematical word problem-solving interventions among elementary schoolers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 132, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Xin, Y. P., & Jitendra, A. K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 32(4), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699903200402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles