Employee Motivation beyond Incentives: An Integrative Review Using Self-Determination Theory and Necessary Condition Analysis

Authors

ATOLAGBE, Adedapo Adetiba

Department of Educational Management, University of Ilorin (Nigeria)

OMIDIJI, Ifeoluwa Abigael

Department of Educational Management, University of Ilorin (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1014MG0199

Subject Category: Educational Management

Volume/Issue: 10/14 | Page No: 2664-2676

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-27

Accepted: 2026-10-02

Published: 2026-10-16

Abstract

Employee motivation remains a persistent concern in organisational behaviour and human resource management, particularly amid observed disengagement, declining commitment, reduced productivity, absenteeism, and turnover. Although organisations invest substantially in salaries, bonuses, promotions, recognition, and other incentives, these interventions do not always produce sustained motivation. This raises an important question: what conditions enable employee motivation to remain sustainable beyond external rewards? This integrative review examines employee motivation beyond incentives by bringing together Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) as complementary perspectives. SDT provides the theoretical foundation by explaining how satisfaction of the three basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness supports autonomous motivation, well-being, engagement, and positive work outcomes. NCA, in contrast, provides a necessity-based lens for distinguishing conditions that are merely beneficial from those that may be required for an outcome to become possible. The review synthesises literature on incentives, psychological need satisfaction, autonomous motivation, leadership support, organisational resources, and necessity logic. It proposes that motivation should not be framed as a choice between incentives and intrinsic motivation. Financial and extrinsic incentives remain important for attracting employees, supporting performance, and meeting employment expectations; however, their effects may depend on the organisational environment in which they operate. Incentives may increase effort without necessarily fostering ownership, commitment, meaning, or sustained engagement. The review therefore proposes a condition-dependent perspective in which psychological and organisational foundations create the possibility for sustainable motivation, while incentives function as supporting rather than substitutive mechanisms. It concludes by proposing an integrated SDT-NCA framework and identifying empirical NCA as a promising approach for testing whether autonomy, competence, relatedness, supportive leadership, and other organisational conditions function as necessary conditions for sustained employee motivation.

Keywords

employee motivation, necessary condition analysis, psychological needs

Downloads

References

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afachung, P. E., Uye, E. E., Ajisafe, T. D., & Olapegba, P. O. (2023). Psychological Ownership and Organisational Fairness as Predictors of Work Motivation among Bankers in Ibadan Metropolis, Oyo State, Nigeria. ESUT Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1). https://esutjss.com/index.php/ESUTJSS/article/view/167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhou, J., Liu, C., Zhang, X., & Yu, T. (2023). A cognitive evaluation and equity-based perspective of pay for performance on job performance: A meta-analysis and path model. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1039375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ding, H., & Kuvaas, B. (2025). Exploring the necessary roles of basic psychological needs at work: A necessary condition analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 98(1), e70012. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dul, J. (2016). Necessary condition analysis (NCA): Logic and methodology of “necessary but not sufficient” causality. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 10–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115584005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dul, J., Hauff, S., & Bouncken, R. B. (2023). Necessary condition analysis (NCA): Review of research topics and guidelines for good practice. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 683–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00628-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2015). Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the organization: Revisiting long-held beliefs. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 489–521. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111418 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hagger, M. S., & McAnally Star, K. (2026). Self-Determination Theory and Workplace Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis, Stress and Health, 42(1), e70151. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hauff, S., Guerci, M., Dul, J., & van Rhee, H. (2021). Exploring necessary conditions in HRM research: Fundamental issues and methodological implications. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12231 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Inegbedion, H. (2022). Motivators of employee commitment at multinational organisations in emerging economies: Empirical evidence from Nigeria. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, Article 234. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01169-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Idowu, S., & Olu-Ogunleye, I. (2024). Employees’ motivation as a determinant of work attitude and performance in elizade university. Journal of Business Theory and Practice, 12(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22158/jbtp.v12n2p1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. McAnally, K., & Hagger, M. S. (2024). Self-Determination Theory and Workplace Outcomes: A Conceptual Review and Future Research Directions. Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nwoko, C., & Yazdani, K. (2022). Remote Working during the Covid-19 Global Pandemic and its Implications for Employee Motivation: Some Evidence from Nigeria through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 4(2), 423-447. https://doi.org/10.32996/jbms.2022.4.2.31 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Slemp, G. R., Kern, M. L., Patrick, K. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review. Motivation and Emotion, 42(5), 706–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9698-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C.-H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Van den Broeck, A., Howard, J. L., Van Vaerenbergh, Y., Leroy, H., & Gagné, M. (2021). Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(3), 240–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866211006173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles