Arabs without Arabic: A Spatio-Temporal Model of Language Attrition and its Implications for National Security
Authors
Al Habtoor Research Centre (Egypt)
Al Habtoor Research Centre (Egypt)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000584
Subject Category: Language
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 7167-7180
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-25
Accepted: 2025-09-30
Published: 2025-11-18
Abstract
This paper challenges the classification of the Arabic language as 'secure' by mainstream language vitality indices. We argue that such assessments, focused on static metrics like speaker numbers, overlook the dynamic and corrosive processes of language attrition driven by globalisation and linguistic hegemony. We introduce a novel Socio-Political-Historical (SPH) framework that integrates Pierre Bourdieu's theory of linguistic capital and Antonio Gramsci's concept of hegemony to analyse the decline of Arabic's socio-economic prestige. Based on this framework, we develop a predictive mathematical model that quantifies the rate of Arabic language attrition across 22 Arab states over a 100-year period (2024-2124). The model forecasts an accelerating decline, particularly in the peripheries of the Arab world, pushing the average status of the language below a critical viability threshold. We argue that this linguistic erosion constitutes a first-order threat to Arab national security, potentially leading to societal fragmentation and conflict, mirroring the Balkanisation of the former Yugoslavia. The paper concludes by proposing a comprehensive policy framework for language revitalisation, structured around governmental regulation, educational reform, and the strategic projection of linguistic soft power, arguing that such measures are a strategic imperative for the future of the Arab world.
Keywords
Arabic language, language Attrition, National Security, Balkanisation
Downloads
References
1. Lewis, Melvyn & Simons, Gary. (2010). Assessing endangerment: Expanding Fishman's GIDS. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique. 55. 10.1017/CBO9780511783364.003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Sinnemäki, Kaius, 2020. "Linguistic system and sociolinguistic environment as competing factors in linguistic variation: a typological approach", Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics (2), 6. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2019-1010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. University of Hawaii Systems. “Tool for Intergenerational Transmission Assessment (TITA).” Accessed September 23, 2025. https://www2.hawaii.edu/~titainfo/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bromham, Lindell, 2023. "Language endangerment: using analytical methods from conservation biology to illuminate loss of linguistic diversity", Cambridge Prisms: Extinction, 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/ext.2022.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Al Ismail, Yazid Abdulrahman. "Translation in the Umayyad Era: Individual Experiences Shaping the Movement." Journal of Educational and Social Research 12, no. 2 (2022): 286-294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. KALIMAH Center. “What Country Speaks Arabic؟ Arabic-Speaking Nations across the World - KALIMAH,” October 25, 2024. https://kalimah-center.com/what-country-speaks-arabic/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Roever, Carsten and Tim McNamara, 2006. "Language testing: the social dimension", International Journal of Applied Linguistics(2), 16:242-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00117.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Abdallah Al-Kahtany and Munassir Alhamami. "Linguistic Hegemony and English in Higher Education". Sustainable Multilingualism Vytautas Magnus University, 20, no. 1 (2022): 18-45. https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2022-0002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Tsuda, Yukio. “English Hegemony and English Divide.” China Media Research 4, no. 1 (2008): 47–55. https://www.uvu.edu/global-intercultural/docs/gi_articles/english_hegemony_and_english_divide.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Tang, Fei and Raees Calafato, 2022. "Transnational multilingual families in china: multilingualism as commodity, conflict, and in-betweenness", Sage Open (1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Lears, Jackson. “The Concept of Cultural Hegemony: Problems and Possibilities.” The American Historical Review 90, no. 3 (June 1985): 567–93. https://sites.evergreen.edu/politicalshakespeares/wp-content/uploads/sites/226/2015/12/lears-cultural-hegemony.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Cole, Nicki Lisa. “What Is Cultural Hegemony?” ThoughtCo, May 18, 2025. Accessed September 23, 2025. https://www.thoughtco.com/cultural-hegemony-3026121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Hylland Eriksen, Thomas. “Linguistic Hegemony and Minority Resistance.” Journal of Peace Research 29, no. 3 (August 1992): 313–32. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022343392029003007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Fitriyah, Aidatul, and Ahmad Dailami Fadhil. “Linguistic Hegemony and the Erosion of Local Languages: Analysis of Arab French Domination to Amazigh Existence in Morocco.” Sinergi International Journal of Communication Sciences 3, no. 1 (February 28, 2025): 29–47. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijcs.v3i1.686. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Letaief, Rim. “The Linguistic Hegemony of English Over Arabs’ Speech: A Case Study of Borrowing and Code-Switching in MBC’s Project Runway Middle East 2,” December 3, 2021. https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/bjal/article/view/2482. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Khalil, Ali and Amany Saleh, 2020. "A language’s demise through a curricular evolution: a preliminary study", Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education(Winter), 11:121-123. https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v11iwinter.1521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Heinrich, Patrick, 2015. "Attitudes to endangered languages: identities and policies by julia sallabank (review)", Language (4), 91:964-966. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Fitriyah, Aidatul, and Ahmad Dailami Fadhil. “Linguistic Hegemony and the Erosion of Local Languages: Analysis of Arab French Domination to Amazigh Existence in Morocco.” Sinergi International Journal of Communication Sciences 3, no. 1 (February 28, 2025): 29–47. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijcs.v3i1.686. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
- Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
- Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
- Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
- Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests