Exploring CEFR Implementation in Arabic Language Teaching: Knowledge, Perceptions, and Challenges Among Teachers

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is now widely used in language education, including Arabic. This study examined how Arabic Language teachers at the Centre for Languages and Pre-Academic Language Development (CELPAD, IIUM) engage with a CEFR aligned curriculum, focusing on their knowledge, perceptions, and challenges. A survey adapted from Ngu and Aziz (2019) was distributed to all staff in the department and included items on familiarity with CEFR, classroom practice, and curriculum implementation. The results show that teachers are generally aware of CEFR and recognise its relevance for teaching and assessment. They viewed CEFR as useful for setting benchmarks and guiding curriculum but reported uneven knowledge beyond the reference levels and difficulties in applying descriptors to lesson planning and student assessment. Teachers also identified the shortage of localized materials, limited training, and incomplete alignment between curriculum and assessment as barriers. These findings show that while CEFR is positively received and valued as a framework, its effective use in Arabic Language teaching requires stronger institutional support, sustained professional development, and resources designed specifically for Arabic.

CEFR, Arabic language teaching, teacher perceptions

1. Abdullah Zawawi, E., & Hussin, H. (2023). English educators’ acceptance of the CEFR at Malaysian polytechnics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(2), 1463–1475. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i2/16283. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abu Amshah, H. A. (2014). Employing the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) in teaching Arabic as a foreign language. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 8(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.24200/jeps.vol8iss1pp75-89 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amrulloh, A. (2023). Arabic teacher candidates’ knowledge and understanding of CEFR in Indonesia. Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, 12(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Habibur Rohman, M., Mustofa, A., & Rahman, F. (2021). Developing CEFR-aligned Arabic learning indicators: A case study in Indonesian Islamic universities. Journal of Language and Education, 7(4), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Karim, M. A., & Sulaiman, T. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions of CEFR implementation in Malaysian primary schools. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(1), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i1.21183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kirkpatrick, A. (2021). The role of English in Southeast Asian education: From colonial legacy to CEFR alignment. Asian Englishes, 23(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2020.1717792 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Little, D. (2020). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages and the European Language Portfolio: Involving learners and their judgements in the assessment process. Language Teaching, 53(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Nurdianto, T., & Jutshin, H. (2020). Constructing Arabic learning outcomes based on CEFR descriptors: Implications for curriculum development. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11(4), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.24 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ngu, M. K., & Aziz, A. A. (2019). English language teachers’ perceptions on the implementation of CEFR-aligned curriculum among primary schools in Malaysia. Seminar Wacana Pendidikan 2019 (SWAPEN 2.0), Subang Jaya, Selang Jaya, Selangor. (pp. 212-222). eISBN 978-967-13352-8-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rasha, A. (2018). Adapting CEFR descriptors for Arabic language teaching: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(6), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.6p.120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Roshimi, M., Zawawi, N., & Kamaruddin, S. (2023). A systematic review of CEFR-aligned Arabic curricula in higher education. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 8(2), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss2pp102-120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Salwa, M. (2021). Challenges in implementing CEFR in Quranic Arabic classrooms: A critical review. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education, 13(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.17576/jiae-2021-1301-05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Soliman, R. (2018). The implementation of the Common European Framework of Reference for the teaching and learning of Arabic as a second language in higher education. In M. Byram & L. Parmenter (Eds.), The Common European Framework of Reference: The globalisation of language education policy (pp. 118–137). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Uri, N. F. M., & Aziz, M. S. A. (2024). Imported CEFR textbooks and Malaysian teachers’ perceptions: Issues of localization and adaptation. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(3), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i3.612 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests