The Opportunities of a Futuristic Private Secondary School Management System in Tanzania
Authors
Ruaha Catholic Univeristy, Iringa, Tanzania (Tanzania)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000683
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 8369-8384
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-07-20
Accepted: 2025-07-26
Published: 2025-11-21
Abstract
This paper explores the opportunities to fill the demands of the contemporary futuristic school in the context of a developing nation. Qualitative approaches were used to collect data that answered a primary research question; “What are the opportunities available for strengthening the management system of private secondary schools in Iringa Region, Tanzania?”. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from school managers, head teachers, teachers, and parents that were purposefully selected, while focus group discussions were administered to students in private secondary schools. The findings indicated that among the several opportunities available, strategic geographic location of a school, and creation of better learning space and time, are key to enrolling an adequate number of students, and enable the teachers and learners to do better in a teaching and learning process. School management systems performance depended on the user-fees; therefore, high enrolment rates were related to fiscal power for survival and sustainability of private schools. While the school community support offers school capacity to implement the education curriculum, differentiated supervision of teachers assures the expected school academic achievements. Nonetheless, good country policies favoring private players investing in secondary education services, and availability of higher learning institutions to absorb adequate number of secondary school graduates offer an advantage to investors in the private secondary school sector. The findings have also indicated that adequacy of the school supplies and capacity to remunerate teachers depends on the number of students enrolled in a school year. Some recommendations are suggested for practices and further research.
Keywords
Futuristic private secondary school, opportunities
Downloads
References
1. Agi, O. K. (2013). African Research Review. An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(1), 340–351. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alsammaryy, Y., Sirisuthi, C., & Duangcharthom, S. (2016). Development of education management system in small primary school. International Education Studies, 9(12), 244–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n12p244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Berryphill, J., Linney, J. A., & Fromewick, J. (2009). The effects of education accountability on teachers: Are policies too-stress provoking for their own good? International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 4(5), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bihu, R. (2024). Qualitative data analysis: Novelty in deductive and inductive coding. Authorea Preprint. Sage. https://advance.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.31124/advance.24143088.v2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bihu, R. (2022). Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Higher Education in Tanzania: A Roadmap for Developing an EPRRM Contingence Plan. In M. B. Garcia (Ed.), Socioeconomic Inclusion During an Era of Online Education (pp. 68–91). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. CEP (2007). Are Private High Schools Better Academically Than Public High Schools? Connecticut Avenue. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Chimombo, J. (2009). Expanding post-primary education in Malawi: Are private schools the answer? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 39(2), 167–184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cochran-Smith, M., Baker, M., Burton, S., Chang, W., Carney, M. C., & Fernandez, M. B., et al. (2017). The accountability era in US teacher education: Looking back, looking forward. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1385061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Chudgar, A., & Quin, E. (2012). Relationship between private schooling and achievement: Results from rural and urban India. Economics of Education Review, 31(4), 376–390. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Day-Ashley, L. (2013). The shifting politics of the private in education: Debates and developments in researching private school outreach in India. Comparative Education, 49(2), 206–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Glatthorm, A. A. (1984). Differentiated supervision. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Godbless, S. (2014). Challenges Facing Private Secondary Schools in the Provision of Education in Tanzania: A case of Arusha City Council (Master’s Dissertation). Saint Augustine University of Tanzania. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kalule, L., & Bouchamma, Y. (2013). Teacher supervision practices: What do teachers think? ISEA, 40(3), 91–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kennedy, R. (2013). Comparison of Private and Public Schools: A Look at the Differences & Similarities. Retrieved on 03/09/2019 from http://privateschool.about.com/od/choosingaschool/qt/comparison.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kivenule, G. (2015). School Performance: A Comparative Study between Public and Private Secondary Schools in Kinondoni Municipal Council. Master’s Dissertation. Mzumbe University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Lassibille, G., Tan, J., & Sumra, S. (1999). Expansion of Private Secondary Education: Experience and Prospects in Tanzania. University of Dar es Salaam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mayer, R. V. (2021). Cybernetic model of the education processes - complexity of the learning material distribution under the didactic system - a combination of interactive teacher and students vs teaching tools. Proceedings of ICERI2021 Conference 8th-9th November 2021 (pp. 089-0197). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357478301_ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Mays, M. (2013). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Public Versus Private Schools. Retrieved on 9th September 2019 from http://www.life123.com/parenting/education/private-school/the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-public-versus-.shtml [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mmasa, M., & Anney, V. N. (2016). Exploring literacy and numeracy teaching in Tanzania classrooms: Insights from teachers’ classroom practices. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 137–154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Mosha, H. J. (2006). Planning Education Systems for Excellence. E & D Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Nasaw, D. (1989). Schooled to Order: A Social History of Public Schooling in the United States. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Odeleye, D. A., & Oyelami, O. A. (2012). Private Owners and Educational Management: Issues and Challenges. http://www.transcampus.org Journal, 15/12/2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. OECD (2012). Public and Private Schools: How Management and Funding Relate to their Socio-economic Profile. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264175006-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Oketch, M., & Somerset, A. (2010). Free Primary Education and after in Kenya: Enrolment Impact, Quality Education, and the Transition to Secondary School. Research Monograph No. 37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED510907 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Riley, R. W., Cortiness, R. C., & Forgione, P. D. (1997). Public and private schools: How do they differ? The Condition of Education 1997, No. 2. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Sabarwal, S., Sununtnasuk, C., & Ramachandran, D. (2020). Low-Cost Private Schools in Tanzania: A Descriptive Analysis. RISE Working Paper 2020, Morogoro. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Schroeder, R. (1998). Max Weber, democracy and modernization. MacMillan Press Ltd. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26836-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Sumra, S., & Katabaro, J. K. (2014). Declining Quality of Education: Suggestions for Arresting and Reversing the Trend. Special THDR Issue: ESRF Discussion Paper 63. The Economic and Social Research Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Shyllon, O., & Joshi, A. R. (2015). Education finance and spending in Tanzania: Challenges and opportunities. In A. R. Joshi & I. Gaddis (Eds.), Preparing the Next Generation in Tanzania: Challenges and Opportunities in Education (pp. 87–110). World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. UNESCO (1994). World Declaration on Education for All and Framework for Action to Meet Basic Learning Needs. World Conference on Education for All, Jomtien, Thailand, March 5–9, 1990. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Walford, G. (2009). Private Schools in England. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 55(5), 716–731. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:4270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organisations. OUP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. World Education Forum (2000). The Dakar Framework for Action on Education for All: Meeting Our Collective Commitments. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Zua, B. (2021). Literacy: Gateway to a World of Exploits. International Journal of Literacy Studies, 9(1), 96–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.1p.96 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study