Exploring the Use of AI Tools in Teaching English in Malaysian Primary Schools: A Qualitative Case Study of Experienced Teachers

Authors

Thivyah A/P Thiruchelvan

Faculty of Education Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (Malaysia)

Kalai Selvan Arumugham

School of Education Universiti Utara Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000690

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 8477-8485

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-02

Accepted: 2025-11-08

Published: 2025-11-21

Abstract

This qualitative case study investigates how experienced English language teachers in Malaysian primary schools integrate Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, QuillBot, and Canva Magic Write into their teaching practices. Five teachers with over five years of experience were purposively selected as participants. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and lesson plan analyses. The findings indicate that AI tools assist teachers in lesson design, assessment, and creative classroom engagement. Teachers reported that these tools enhance efficiency, differentiation, and student motivation, though challenges remain regarding technological limitations, overreliance, and the need for continuous professional development. The study highlights that effective AI integration can strengthen English language pedagogy when supported by adequate training, ethical awareness, and technological infrastructure.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning

Downloads

References

1. Abdul Ghani, M. T., et al. (2024). Responsible and ethical use of artificial intelligence in language education: A systematic review. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.7092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anney, V. N. (2015). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 5(2), 272–281. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Basaruddin, M. A., & Mustafa, H. R. (2025). Empowering AI for English materials analysis in Malaysian primary special education schools. Asian Journal of English Language & Pedagogy, 13(1), 16-40.https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol13.1.2.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brink, H. I. L. (1993). Validity and reliability in qualitative research. Curationis, 16(2), 35–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dai, J., & Mohamad Nasri, N. (2025). The integration of AI in K–12 and university English language teaching: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i2/25369 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. D. Kriukow. (n.d.). Validity and reliability in qualitative research Qualitative Researcher. https://drkriukow.com/validity-and-reliability-in-qualitative-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Haddi @ Junaidi, K., Megat Khalid, P. Z., Sulaiman, S., Abu Sufi, M. K., & Chaniago, R. H. (2023). Systematic literature review: Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) in teaching and learning of language. Asian Journal of English Language & Pedagogy, 11(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol11.1.8.2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Iksan, Z. H., & Saper, M. N. (n.d.). The process of validity and reliability for verbal questioning research in the classroom. Global Journal of Educational Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kessler, G. (2023). The future of AI in language education: Promise and pedagogical challenges. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kumar, R., Zulkifli, H., & Omar, F. (2024). Challenges and opportunities in AI adoption among Malaysian educators. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 14–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kussin, H. @ J., Megat Khalid, P. Z., Chaniago, R. H., Moneyam, S., & Hassim, H. E. (2024). The future of lesson planning: AI integration experiences among TESL teacher trainees in a Malaysian public university. Asian Journal of English Language & Pedagogy, 12(2), 178- 189.https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol12.2.13.2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Li, S. (2020). The impact of feedback timing and modality on second language writing. Language Teaching Research, 24(3), 348–369. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Novitasari, Y., Bastian, A., Reswita, & Wahyuni, S. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the development of early English teaching materials. Global Education Journal. https://journal.civiliza.org/index.php/gej/article/view/819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rocconi, L. (2025). AI literacy: Elementary and secondary teachers’ use of AI tools, reported confidence, and professional development needs. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rocconi, L., Talanquer, V., & Guzmán, S. (2025). Teacher confidence and the use of AI in global classrooms. Computers & Education, 205, 105–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Salim, N. S., Rajan, A., & Yunus, M. M. (2025). Bridging global AI innovations with local ESL classrooms: A conceptual framework for adaptive language learning tools. Semarak Proceedings of Computer Science and Engineering, 1(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.37934/spcse.1.1.4156a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. SimplyPsychology. (n.d.). Reliability & validity in qualitative research. https://www.simplypsychology.org/reliability-and-validity-in-qualitative-research.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies. (n.d.). Understanding validity and reliability from qualitative and quantitative research traditions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Williamson, B., & Piattoeva, N. (2022). Education governance and data ethics in the age of AI. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2022). The integration of digital technologies in Malaysian classrooms: Teachers’ perspectives and challenges. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(2), 121–134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Zulkarnain, N. F., & Yunus, M. M. (2023). Exploring Malaysian teachers’ readiness towards AI integration in English teaching. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations, 3(1), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zulkarnain, N. S., & Yunus, M. M. (2023). Primary teachers’ perspectives on using artificial intelligence technology in English as a second language teaching and learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i2/17119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zulkefli, N. H., & Ismail, H. H. (2023). The impact of AI on ESL writing autonomy: A systematic review. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v10i8.3555 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles