Hacker, Hustler, or Hipster: Decoding Perceived Role Strain in Academic Information Technology Software Development Teams

Software development projects at South East Asian Institute of Technology, Inc. (SEAIT), often require students to adopt roles following the Hacker–Hustler–Hipster framework. While roles are assigned to balance responsibilities, disparities in workload and expectations can still cause stress, impacting both team dynamics and individual performance. Students may experience varying levels of mental, emotional, physical, and social strain. Despite the inevitability of burdens and overload in collaborative teams, limited research has examined how each role specifically affects students’ stress levels, providing an incomplete overview of how role assignment impacts wellbeing. To close this gap, the current study evaluated how 241 third-year IT students at SEAIT perceived their stress levels. Subsequent to a role pre-test, respondents were administered a survey using a 4-point Likert scale to assess strain across four dimensions.
The results showed that the demands of coding and problem-solving caused the greatest strain for Hackers (x̄ = 2.74, High Strain), who were followed by Hipsters (x̄ = 2.59, High Strain) from tasks involving documentation and design. Coordination tasks appeared less taxing, as Hustlers reported the lowest strain (x̄ = 2.37, Minimal Strain). Regardless of role, projects can be stressful, as evidenced by the overall mean of 2.56 (High Strain). Statistical analysis using ANOVA revealed that there were no significant differences in emotional strain (F = 2.618, p = 0.07537), but there were in mental (F = 9.021, p = 0.00018), physical (F = 5.959, p = 0.00305), and social (F = 4.721, p = 0.00990) strains. These findings underscore the significance of role-specific strain, the importance of fair workload distribution, and the need of more robust student support systems in project-based learning environments.

Software Development Project, Hacker–Hustler–Hipster Framework

1. Ahmed, S. K. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncology Reports, 12, Article 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chaudhry, S., Tandon, A., Shinde, S., & Bhattacharya, A. (2024). Student psychological well-being in higher education: The role of internal team environment, institutional, friends and family support and academic engagement. PLoS ONE, 19(1), e0297508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297508 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Gonçales, L. J., Farias, K., & da Silva, B. C. (2021). Measuring the cognitive load of software developers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Information and Software Technology, Volume 136, 106563, ISSN 0950-5849. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S095058492100046X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Javier, B. S. (2021). Understanding their voices from within: Difficulties and code comprehension of lifelong novice programmers. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 1(1), 53–73. https://www.ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Jensen, K. J., Mirabelli, J. F., Kunze, A. J., Romanchek, T. E., & Cross, K. J. (2023). Undergraduate student perceptions of stress and mental health in engineering culture. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 30. https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-02300419-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kuwabara, M., Einbinder, S. D., Sun, R., & Azizi, R. (2020). Collaborative learning techniques, student learning outcomes, and equal workload within groups in different teaching modalities. International [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(2), 293–304. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1286478.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Licorish, S. A., & MacDonell, S. G. (2017). Exploring software developers’ work practices: Task differences, participation, engagement, and speed of task resolution. Information & Management 54(3), pp.364-382. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.07847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. McCombes, S. (2023). Descriptive Research | definition, types, methods & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Pattath, P., & Webb, L. (2022). Computer-usage and associated musculoskeletal discomfort in college students. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 73(1), 327334. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Project Management Institute. (2025). The invisible workload: Managing emotional labor in project management. PMI CIC. https://pmi-cic.org/blog/id/47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rudic, B., Hubner, S., & Baum, M. (2021). Hustlers, hipsters and hackers: Potential employees’ stereotypes of entrepreneurial leaders. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 15, e00220. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobuve/v15y2021ics2352673420300767.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sharma, M. (2025). Hipsters, hustlers, hackers, and the invisible thread: Role differentiation and its impact on team dynamics and mental health. Manu Sharma Blog. https://manusharma.ca/the-art-of-buildinghipsters-hustlers-hackers-and-the-invisible-thread/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Slimmen, S., Timmermans, O., Mikolajczak-Degrauwe, K., & Oenema, A. (2022). How stress-related factors affect mental wellbeing of university students: A cross-sectional study to explore the associations between stressors, perceived stress, and mental wellbeing. PLoS One, 17(11): e0275925. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639818/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tan, S. E., & Jung, I. (2024). Unveiling the dynamics and impact of emotional presence in collaborative learning. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 21, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00477-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tulili, T. R., Capiluppi, A., & Rastogi, A. (2023). Burnout in software engineering: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, Volume 155, 107116, ISSN 0950-5849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Uddin, G, Alam, O., & Serebrenik, A. (2022). A qualitative study of developers' discussions of their problems and joys during the early months of COVID-19. Empirical Software Engineering, 27(3), Article 59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9166204/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study