Factors Affecting Generation Z in Choosing Political Candidate

The findings revealed that Generation Z voters highly valued candidates with integrity and clean record, compassion and empathy, diligence and leadership, education and knowledge and experience and tract record. They favored platforms that were clear and realistic programs, focuses to the goodness of the people especially for the youth like special programs that is relevant to what the community needs. They rejected unethical practices such as vote-buying. Authentic engagement through personal interaction such as house-to-house visits seen as a sign of sincerity and genuine public service. Moreover, the study found that external influences including family discussions, peer recommendations and exposure to social and digital media played a significant role in shaping political preferences. The study recommended that the Generation Z voters should exercise caution and refrain from placing their trust solely in rumors or hearsay, instead, they should conduct thorough background checks and verify the authenticity of information before forming opinions in making decisions. Educators and local leaders were encouraged to strengthen voter education, political literacy and civic engagement programs that cultivate critical thinking and ethical awareness. In line with this, the researchers proposed a voter education initiative entitled “Navigating the Ballot: A Generation Z Voter’s Guide”, conducted in partnership with the Sangguniang Kabataan Federation of Infanta. The program aims to promote media literacy, responsible political participation, and continuous civic involvement through discussions, interactive activities and engagement with young political advocates, thereby empowering generation Z as informed agent of change.

factors, generation z, politics, choice, civic

1. Abadi, T. W., Sani, Z. A., Febriana, P., & Wui, K. L. T. (2024b). Candidate electability on social media and Gen Z voter behavior in the 2024 presidential election. Communicatus Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.15575/cjik.v8i2.40732 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aksakal, İ., & Avcı, M. (2024). The effect of Generation Z’s understanding of free will and fatalism on their political choice: a field study. Social Sciences, 13(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13020086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alexander, A. (n.d.). Voting Behavior and Motivations across Generations: Evidence from a Nationally Representative U.S. Survey. eGrove. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/2684 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Batara, E., Labadan, A. K., & Roa, M. (2021). Factors affecting youth voting preferences in the Philippine senatorial Election: A Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) analysis. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.123137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cadayday, B. a. R., Jimenez, D. M., & Boiser, S. M. (2024). Role of social media in the political landscape and voting decisions of Gen Zs in the Philippines. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(XII), 720–730. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.8120059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cheng, Z., Chen, J., Peng, R. X., & Shoenberger, H. (2023). Social media influencers talk about politics: Investigating the role of source factors and PSR in Gen-Z followers’ perceived information quality, receptivity and sharing intention. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 21(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2173700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dewi, E. a. S., Sanofi, Z., Wibowo, K. A., & Arifin, H. S. (2025). Political communication preferences of Generation Z in West Java: insights from an explanatory sequential study. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2025.2512841 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Edawarma, N. N., Sari, N. D. K., & Yeni, N. Y. H. (2025). MEMENANGKAN HATI GEN Z: Peran Pemasaran Media Sosial, Branding Politik, dan Citra Kandidat Muda dalam Keberhasilan Pemilu di Sumatra Barat. Journal Publicuho, 8(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v8i1.636 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fitri, A. N., Fitri, F., Fabriar, S. R., Rachmawati, F., & Hilmi, M. (2023). Gen Z voter behavior in the 2024 presidential election: A virtual ethnographic study on the Instagram accounts of presidential candidates. Islamic Communication Journal, 8(2), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2023.8.2.18945 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hadi, S. N. I. A., Hassan, M. S., Ghani, S. N. F. F. A., Ibrahim, N. a. N., Ngadiron, S., & Zainudin, S. S. S. (2022). Factors Influencing Tabayyun in Political Information among Gen Z: A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i9/14561 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kholisoh, N., Yuliawati, E., Suci, N. R., & Suharman, T. (2019). The influence of political messages in new media to political awareness and its impact on the political participation of millennial generation. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 4(2), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v4i2.333 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kurniawan, N. A., Premananto, G. C., Candraningrat, C., Aprilius, A., & Hidayat, R. (2024). GENERATION Z PARTICIPATION IN POLITICS AN APPROACH TO CONSUMER BEHAVIOR THEORY. Business and Finance Journal, 9(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.33086/bfj.v9i1.5828doi.or [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. McCombs and Shaw, E. A. L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting function of mass media. Oxford University Press, 36(Summer, 1972), 2. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. McDonald, J., & Deckman, M. (2021). New voters, new attitudes: how Gen Z Americans rate candidates with respect to generation, gender, and race. Politics Groups and Identities, 11(2), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.1962372 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Newman, N., Levy, D., & Nielsen, R. K. (2015). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2619576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nor, N. M. M., Yaacob, N. H., & Jamal, M. B. (2024). LITERATURE REVIEW OF YOUTH’S TENDENCIES IN DETERMINING POLITICAL CANDIDATES IN GENERAL ELECTIONS. International Journal of Law Government and Communication, 9(38), 352–371. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijlgc.938023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oral, U. (2023). The use of media by Turkey’s generation Z as a source for political information. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20(51), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1214406 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Orzal, L. B. B., Toring, L. a. G., Coton, M. a. A., Lucenecio, D. M. P., Nunez, R. M. C., Bordon, K., Delan, D. J. R., & Almazan, M. C. R. (2023). Understanding voters’ preference for candidates in the Philippine presidential elections. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(10), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2023.v03i10.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Parmelee, J. H., Perkins, S. C., & Beasley, B. (2022). Personalization of politicians on Instagram: what Generation Z wants to see in political posts. Information Communication & Society, 26(9), 1773–1788. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2022.2027500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rice, L. L., & Moffett, K. W. (2021). The political voices of Generation Z. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003168898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Robin, P., Alvin, S., & Hasugian, T. (2022). GEN-Z PERSPECTIVE ON POLITICS: HIGH INTEREST, UNINFORMED, AND URGING POLITICAL EDUCATION. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik (JISIP), 11(3), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.33366/jisip.v11i3.2550 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Robinson, L. (2024). Gen Z’s gendered divergences in the U.S. 2024 election: Digital engagement, education, and politics. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i12.13865 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Shahzad, N. F., Shahid, N. M., Bibi, N. H., & Shabbir, N. A. (2025). Social Media as a Tool for Political Education among Gen Z. ˜the œCritical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 1729–1741. https://doi.org/10.59075/70gydg86 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sumatra, E. J. (2024). Examining how candidate attributes shape Gen Z perceptions for the 2025 Philippine Senate elections using conjoint analysis. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Sumerta, I. K., Premananto, G., Samadara, P., Effasa, A. S., & Perbawa, N. I. (2024b). Political branding and the Gen Z vote: A phenomenological study of young voters in Indonesia. Journal of Logistics Informatics and Service Science. https://doi.org/10.33168/jliss.2024.0624 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Utari, U., Wulandari, Y., Colby, C., & Crespi, C. (n.d.). Political Participation of the Millennial Generation in General Elections: The Influence of Education, Social Media, and Economic Factors. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 12(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.35335/jiph.v12i3.10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar