Seating Arrangement and Students’ Behaviour in French Language Classroom: A Qualitative Case Study in Higher Education in Malaysia.

Several educators believed that the seating arrangement is a critical factor for learning performance. Seating arrangement is considered as a pivotal factor in giving positive learning outcomes and learning behaviour. Most of the educational literature addresses issues such as room temperature, room lighting, and acoustics (Conners, 1983, Granstrom, 1996). Fewer studies have been conducted on the classroom seating arrangement and its effects on students’ actions and learning (Haghighi and Jusan, 2012, Hoekstra et al., 2023). This paper examines the impact of seating locations on student classroom learning. Specifically, it examines the impact of seating on a) student learning behaviour b) student and teacher relationships c) attention d) student classroom participation. Active engagement and participation in the learning experience positively affects students' learning while promoting the use of higher order thinking skills (Flynn, Vermette, Mesibov and amp; Smith, 2009; McKeachie, 1990; Stronge, 2007). This study was conducted with an objective to compare two different types of seating arrangements: rows and circular in the traditional and modern classrooms of French language while observing students’ learning behaviour.

Education

1. Anderson (2009), The effects of seating arrangement on students’ on task-behaviour, The Capella University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Author, J. (2014). A ten year study of faculty classroom observations. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal, 7(2), 1-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Atherton, J. S. (2005). Teaching in learning: Physical layout. Retrieved December 20, 2007 from https://www.learningand teaching.info/teaching/layout.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Badia-Martin, M. (2006). Disruptive behaviour in schools. Educational Journal, 92, 33-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bennett, N. and Blundell, D. (1983) Quantity and quality of work in rows and classroom groups, Educational Psychology, 3, 2, 93-105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Black, S. (2007). Achievement by design. American School Board Journal, 194(10), 39-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bonus, M., & RIORDAN, L. (1998). Increasing student on-task behaviour through the use of specific seating arrangements. Master’s Action research Project, Saint Xavier University and IRI/ Skylight field-based Master program, retrieved November, 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Canter, L., & Canter, M. (1976). Assertive discipline: A take charge approach for today’s educator. Los Angeles: lee canter and Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chingos, M.M. (2013). Class size and student outcomes: Research and policy implications. Journal of Policy analysis and management, 32(2), 411-438. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Conners, D. A. (1983). The school environment: A link to understanding stress. Theory into Practice, 22 (1), 15-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Curwin, R. L., & Mendler, A. N. (1988), Packaged discipline programs: Let the buyer beware. Educational Leadership, 46(2), 68-71. Designing spaces that inspire learning. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from https: //www.schoolfacilities.com/cd_2924.aspx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Downer, J. T., Rimm-Kaufman, S.E., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children’s risk for school problems contribute to children’s behavioral engagement in learning? School Psychology Review, 6(3), 413-432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fernandes, A. C., Huang, J., & Rinaldo, V. (2011). Does Where A Student Sits Really Matter? -The Impact of Seating Locations on Student Classroom Learning. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 10(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Falout, J. (2014). Circular seating arrangements: Approaching the social crux in language classrooms. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 275-300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Granström, M., & Inganäs, O. (1996). White light emission from a polymer blend light emitting diode. Applied physics letters, 68(2), 147-149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gifford, R. (2002), Environmental psychology: principles and practice, Colville, WA: Optimal Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Gump, P.V. (1987), school and classroom environments. In D. Stokols and I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp, 691-732), New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hammang, A. J. (2012). The Effect of Seating Assignments on Student achievement in the Biology Classroom. Montana State University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Haghighi, M. M., & Jusan, M. M. (2012). Exploring students’ behavior on seating arrangements in learning environment: a review. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 287-294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hoekstra, N. A., van den Berg, Y. H., Lansu, T. A., Mainhard, M. T., & Cillessen, A. H. (2023). Teachers’ goals and strategies for classroom seating arrangements: A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 124, 104016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hurt, T, H., Scott, M, D., & McCroskey, J. C. (1978), Communication in the classroom. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Idayu, N., Mohd, B., Ahmad, A.R. & Awang, M.M. (2016). Classroom Environment enhance in determining students’ success. International conference on education and Regional Development, 1 November, 652-656. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. James, W. Z. (2016). The flipped Classroom, a review of the literature. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 48(2), 97-103. Doi: 10.1108/ICT-05-2015-0039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. John, A. W. (1999). Classroom Arrangement and student behaviour. Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Juhary, J. (2012). An Assigned Seating Arrangement based on Students’ Performance: A Critical Review. Education and practice, 3(14), 10-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lotfy, N. (2012). Seating Arrangement and Cooperative Learning Activities: students’ on-task/off-task Participation in EFL Classrooms. American University, Cairo. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mahmud Mohd Jusan (2010a) Means End Chain, person Environment Congruence and Mass Housing Design. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Open house International, Vol..35 No.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Minchen, B. J. (2007). The effects of classroom seating on students’ performance in a high school science setting. The college at Brockport. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mudassir, I. U. Norsuhaily, A. B. ( 2015). The influence of School Environment on academic performance of secondary school students in Kuala Lumpur. International Conference on empowering Islamic civilization. University Sulatn Zainal Abidin (UniSZA) Malaysia., hlm. Vol. 6-7, 252-261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ngware, M. W., Ciera, J., Musyoka, P. K. & Oketch, M. (2013). The influence of classroom seating position on student learning gains in primary schools in kenya. Scientific research, 4(11), 705-712 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Peter, B. Yufan, Z. Fay, D, L. B. (2015) Clever Classrooms. Engine House Islington Mill Studios. University Salford Manchester: ISBN978-1-907842-63-4, 53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rennels, M.R., & Chaudhari, R.B. (1988). Eye contact and grade distribution. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67(2), 627-632 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Richards, J. (2006). Setting the stage for student engagement. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42 (2), 92-94. Retrieved December 20, 2007 from ProQuest Education Journals database, (Document ID:955429681) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Slavin, R.E. (2003) Educational Psychology: theory and practice (seventh edition), Boston MA: Pearson Education, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sommer, R. (1969b) Personal Space: The behavioral basis of design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Steinzor, B. (1950). The spatial factor in face-to-face discussion groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45, 552-555 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Weinstein, C.S. (1992). Designing the instructional environment: Focus on seating. Bloomington, IN: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 348 039) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study