Exploring Funds of Knowledge in Betong, Sarawak Families Relevance for Science Learning

This study explores the concept of funds of knowledge (FoK) within the Betong, Sarawak community, emphasizing its role in science education. The notion of FoK refers to the recognition and appreciation of the extensive cultural practices, traditions, and wisdom embedded in community life. The research aims to identify forms of knowledge commonly practiced by families in Betong, Sarawak and examine their relevance to science learning. Grounded in the understanding that students’ cultural experiences shaped by home environments and daily practices inform educational engagement, this study adopts a qualitative approach with case studies research design involving three informants. Data were collected through observations, and interviews. Findings reveal diverse FoK rooted in cultural heritage, daily activities, phenomenological experiences, and ancestral traditions transmitted across generations. The community perceives these knowledge systems as vital for contemporary development and advocates their preservation for future generations. The study underscores the significance of integrating cultural knowledge into science education and highlights the ongoing practice and transmission of these FoK within the community. This research contributes to discussions on culturally relevant pedagogy and the intergenerational continuity of indigenous knowledge.

Indigenous knowledge; cultural heritage; community-based learning

1. Andree, M., & Lager-Nyquist, L. (2012). ‘What do you know about fat?’ Drawing on Diverse Funds of Knowledge in Inquiry Based Science Education. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 8(2), 178. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.526 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad Nurulazam & Rohandi (2015). Incorporating Students’ Funds of Knowledge to Develop Students’ Interest Towards Learning Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Banks, J. A. (1993). The canon debate, knowledge construction, and multicultural education. Educational Researcher, 22(5), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X022005004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen, S.K. 2003. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Borgerding, L. A. (2016). High school biology evolution learning experiences in a rural context: a case of and for cultural border crossing. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016- 9758-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Borgerding, L. A. (2017). High school biology evolution learning experiences in a rural context: a case of and for cultural border crossing. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9758-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (421- 458). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bronkhorst, L., & Akkerman, S. (2016). At the boundary of school: Continuity and discontinuity in learning across contexts. Educational Research Review, 19, 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.04.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Eilks, I., & Hofstein, A. (2014). Combining the question of the relevance of science education with the idea of education for sustainable development. In I. Eilks, S. Markic, & B. Ralle (Eds.), Science education research and education for sustainable development (pp. 3–14). Aachen: Shaker [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 860-877. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Genzuk, M. (1999). Tapping Into Community Funds of Knowledge. In Effective Strategies for English Language Acquisition: Curriculum Guide for Professional Development of Teachers. Los Angeles: LAAMP/ARCO [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gonzalez, N., & Moll, L. C. (2002). Cruzando el Puente: Building bridges to funds of knowledge. Educational Policy, 16, 623–641. doi:10.1177/0895904802016004009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hogg, L. (2011). Funds of knowledge: An investigation of coherence within the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lin, M., & Bates, B. (2010). Home visits: How do they affect teachers’ beliefs about teaching and diversity? Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(3), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0393-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Llopart, M., & Esteban-Guitart, M. (2017). Strategies and resources for contextualising the curriculum based on the funds of knowledge approach: A literature review. The Australian Educational Researcher, 44, 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0237-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Llopart, M., & Esteban-Guitart, M. (2018). Funds of knowledge in 21st century societies: Inclusive educational practices for under-represented students. A literature review. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1247913. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Llopart, M., Serra, J. M., & Esteban-Guitart, M. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of the benefits, limitations, and areas for improvement of the funds of knowledge approach. A qualitative study. Teachers and Teaching. Theory and Practice, 24(5), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1452729. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Marsh, M. M., & Zhulamanova, I. (2017). Follow the leader: Attending to the curriculum making potential of preschoolers. Early Child Development and Care, 187(5–6), 1004–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1223069. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. McLaughlin, D. S., & Barton, A. C. (2013). Preservice teachers’ uptake and understanding of funds of knowledge in elementary science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 13–36. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9284- 1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mills, K., Bonsignore, E., Clegg, T., Ahn, J., Yip, J., Pauw, D., … Pitt, C. (2018). Designing to illuminate children’s scientific funds of knowledge through social media sharing. IDC 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202737 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mills, K., Bonsignore, E., Clegg, T., Ahn, J., Yip, J., Pauw, D., … Pitt, C. (2019). Connecting children’s scientific funds of knowledge shared on social media to science concepts. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 21, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.04.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonz´alez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Østergaard, E. (2017). Earth at rest – aesthetic experience and students’ grounding in science education. Science & Education, 26, 557–582. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Østergaard, E., Dahlin, B., & Hugo, A. (2008). Doing phenomenology in science education: a research review. Studies in Science Education, 44, 93–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ord´o˜nez, D., Siques, C., & Esteban-Guitart, M. (2018). “The best way to learn language is not by doing language”. Incorporating funds of identity for learning Spanish in a shared education unit. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1551324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rajasekaran, B., Warren, D. M., & Babu, S. C. (1991). Indigenous natural‐resource management systems for sustainable agricultural development—a global perspective. Journal of international development, 3(3), 387-401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Tenery, M. F. (2005). La visita. In N. Gonz´alez, L. C. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities and classrooms (pp. 119–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ulluwishewa, R. (1993). Indigenous knowledge systems for sustainable development: The case of pest control by traditional paddy farmers in Sri Lanka. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 3(1), 51-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Valencia, R. R., & Solórzano, D. G. (2012). Contemporary deficit thinking. In The evolution of deficit thinking (pp. 160-210). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Warren, D. M. (1992, August). Indigenous knowledge, biodiversity conservation and development. In Keynote address for the international conference on Conservation of biodiversity in Africa: Local initiatives and institutional roles. Nairobi: National Museums of Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Williams, R. (2020). Culture and materialism. Verso Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study