Determinants of Women-Friendly and Sustainable City Development: An Empirical Assessment of Cultural Value and Industry 4.0 Readiness

The quest for sustainable and inclusive urban development has heightened global interest in constructing communities that are both environmentally resilient and attuned to gender-specific requirements. Even though there has been a lot of progress in research on smart cities and sustainability, not much has been done to look at how cultural value orientations and preparation for Industry 4.0 work together to determine the growth of cities that are good for women. This research fills this vacuum by doing a thorough conceptual, argumentative, and comparative assessment of multidisciplinary literature on feminist urbanism, cultural theory, sustainability studies, and digital change. The investigation uncovers three essential insights. First, cultural value orientations, especially collectivism, equality, and low power distance, are important factors that shape governance structures, societal norms, and the importance of women's safety, mobility, and involvement. Second, being ready for Industry 4.0 is both a driver and a conditional facilitator of gender-inclusive sustainability. It provides technical means to improve safety, accessibility, data-driven policymaking, and economic empowerment. Third, the interplay between cultural logics and technology preparedness creates dynamic paths that can either promote gender-inclusive urban outcomes or perpetuate structural inequities. This research provides a comprehensive conceptual model elucidating the co-evolution of cultural value systems and technology preparedness in the context of fostering women-friendly sustainable urban development. The research improves theoretical discourse by integrating socio-cultural and digital transformation paradigms, while providing policy insights that underscore culturally sensitive, technology-driven, and gender-responsive urban design. This synthesis lays the groundwork for future empirical research and aids policymakers in creating inclusive urban spaces that adhere to the tenets of sustainable development and gender equity.

Women-Friendly City, Industrial 4.0 Readiness, Cultural Values Dimensions, Sustainable City.

1. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., ... & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Berg, A., & Longhurst, R. (2003). Placing masculinities and femininities in teaching and learning. Gender and Education, 15(2), 175–190. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Choi, J., Yi, Y., & Lee, K. C. (2017). The impact of cultural values on technology acceptance. Information Technology & People, 30(4), 719–740. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Greed, C. (2016). Taking women’s rights into account in planning for sustainable cities. Environment and Urbanization, 28(1), 237–254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Herring, S. C. (2012). Computer-mediated communication and the emerging media studies. In The Handbook of Internet Studies (pp. 1–24). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE research of 62 societies. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Huang, C. Y., Wu, T. C., & Hsu, Y. C. (2019). Cultural impacts on the adoption of new technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205–217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kramers, A., Höjer, M., Lövehagen, N., & Wangel, J. (2014). Smart sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ricci, M. (2015). Transport and social exclusion: New perspectives. Transport Policy, 42, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sánchez de Madariaga, I., & Neuman, M. (2018). Engendering cities: Designing sustainable urban spaces for all. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Saxena, A., Gupta, R., & Mehrotra, D. (2020). Digital health solutions in smart cities. Healthcare Informatics Research, 26(2), 124–134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2012). Examining the impact of culture’s consequences. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 1059–1078. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. UN-Habitat. (2012). Women-friendly cities initiative: Toolkit. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Valdivia, A. (2018). Smart surveillance as a tool for women’s safety. Urban Studies, 55(8), 1738–1754. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Whitzman, C., Legacy, C., Andrew, C., & Shaw, M. (2014). Building gender mainstreaming into the planning curriculum. Town Planning Review, 85(3), 305–324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria