Factors Contributing to Asnaf Students' School Dropout and Referral to Rehabilitation Centers: A Case Study at Secondary Schools in Perlis

School dropout among Asnaf students who are eligible for zakat assistance under Islamic social welfare remains a critical concern for educational equity in Malaysia. In Perlis, an increasing number of Asnaf students have been referred to rehabilitation centers due to truancy, behavioral issues, and emotional distress. This study aims to identify and analyze the key factors contributing to school dropout among Asnaf students in eight secondary schools across the state. Guided by five hypotheses, economic hardship, family instability, community influence, educational quality, and psychological challenges, the study explores how these interconnected dimensions shape the educational experiences of marginalized Muslim youth.
Using a qualitative case study design, the research engaged 16 participants (eight school counselors and eight discipline teachers) through semi-structured interviews conducted between June and August 2025. Data were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase framework, ensuring credibility through member checking, peer debriefing and reflexive journaling. The thematic analysis yielded five major themes:
1) Economic hardship and financial instability;
2) Family instability and emotional neglect;
3) Community pressure and negative peer influence;
4) Educational quality and resource limitations; and
5) Psychological challenges and low self-esteem.
Cross-case comparison revealed dynamic interactions among these factors, forming an ecological cycle where poverty and emotional stress amplify disengagement, eventually leading to dropout or rehabilitation referral.
Findings demonstrate that economic hardship and family instability are the strongest predictors of school dropout, while community influence, school limitations, and psychological distress act as reinforcing mechanisms. Counselors emphasized inconsistent zakat assistance, limited parental supervision, and inadequate school counseling resources as key structural issues.
The study proposes a multi-tiered intervention model that involves predictable zakat-based education support, trauma-informed teacher training, community mentorship initiatives, and embedded mental health screening in schools. Ultimately, the research highlights the need for an integrated policy framework that links education, social welfare, and mental health services to sustain Asnaf students’ engagement and prevent their marginalization through dropout and rehabilitation cycles.
In addition to educators’ perspectives, the study acknowledges the value of incorporating insights from students, family members, and rehabilitation officers to achieve richer data triangulation. While these groups were not primary participants, their contextual experiences were captured indirectly through counselors’ narratives and referral records, strengthening interpretive depth.

Asnaf students, school dropout, rehabilitation centers

1. Nurmalitasari, K. (2023). Factors influencing dropout students in higher education. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2023, 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7704142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Hibbin, R. (2024).Relational responsibility, social discipline, and behaviour in secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 125, 102276. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2023.2263453 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alonso-Rodríguez, I., Pérez-Jorge, D., Pérez-Pérez, I., & Olmos-Raya, E. (2025). Restorative practices in reducing school violence: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1520137. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1520137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bussu, A. (2020). Critical issues and improvements to prevent dropout risk in disadvantaged contexts. Children & Society, 34(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480220940858 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Psyridou, M., et al. (2024). Machine learning predicts upper secondary education dropout. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 4551–4574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12345-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mohamed Esa, M. S. (2025). Asnaf development outcomes: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251357982 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Rozali, A. Z., Mustapa, W. N. W., Rashad, N. Z. A., Radz, W. N. W. M., Ahmad, N., & Ali, M. A. (2025). Social influence and intention to pursue higher education among Asnaf students. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling, 10(59), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.1059004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ariffin, M. I. (2024). Exploring education zakat across Malaysian states. International Journal of Islamic Finance, 2(2), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijif.v2i2.2312 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ali, N., & Zainal, A. (2021). Peer influence and adolescent risk behaviours in Malaysian secondary schools. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 6(3), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.21315/ajssr2021.6.3.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Noor, S. M., & Abdullah, R. (2022). School counselling capacity and barriers in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Counseling and Guidance, 10(2), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.24191/mjcg.v10i2.19854 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Rahman, S., & Hassan, R. (2023). Youth rehabilitation and social reintegration in Malaysia. Journal of Social Development, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47556/JSD.15.1.2023.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Warner, L., & Evans, J. (2021). Restorative approaches to school discipline. International Journal of School Social Work, 6(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.4148/2161-4148.1078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ping, C. Y. (2024). Education inequality during emergency remote learning in Selangor. Malaysian Journal of Social Administration, 23(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.17576/mjsa-2024-23-01-02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Yusuf, B. N. M. (2023). Factors affecting truancy among Malaysian students. International Journal of Education and Policy Research, 12(3), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijepr.v12n3p45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ishad, A. R., & Rahimi, N. (2024). Asnaf empowerment through conditional cash transfers. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 19(1), 11–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Paulsen, T., & Berg, T. (2020). Truancy, school refusal, and dropout: A review of global evidence. Educational Review, 72(4), 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1513909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Teasley, M. L., et al. (2021). School discipline disparities and systemic change. Children & Schools, 43(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdab009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Peguero, A. A. (2020). School punishment, poverty, and exclusion. Youth & Society, 52(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X20954613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Day, A., & Weng, X. (2022). Family support and youth behavioural outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 31, 2001–2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02219-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Othman, M., & Rahim, S. (2020). Zakat-funded education support and student outcomes in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2018-0157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Widen, S. E. (2022). Family poverty and schooling stressors. Journal of Adolescence, 94, 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2022.08.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wong, B., & Cheong, Y. (2021). Hidden dropout among Malaysian B40 students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09649-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Abdullah, A., & Salleh, N. (2019). Exploring dropout patterns in Malaysian rural secondary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(5), 915–928. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i5/5951 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hashim, N., & Yunos, R. (2020). Zakat institutions and educational resilience. Journal of Islamic Social Finance, 2(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.24191/jisf.v2i1.10321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kamal, H., & Adnan, S. (2023). Teacher–student relationship and dropout risk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103951 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Taufiq, M., & Saad, I. (2024). Barriers to reintegration after juvenile rehabilitation in Malaysia. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 63(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2023.2284451 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Koenig, M. (2021). Understanding youth substance involvement and risk. Journal of Substance Use, 26(5), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2020.1835923 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Andrews, J. (2020). Socio-ecological approaches to youth dropout. Review of Educational Research, 90(6), 849–875. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320944783 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Samuels, W., & Stewart, J. (2022). Restorative justice practices in secondary schools. Urban Education, 57(9), 1231–1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920934545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2022). Dropout prevention and school engagement report. Malaysian Education Journal, 48(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.17576/mej-2022-4802-06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar