Professional Development and Digital Literacy as Correlates of Technology and Livelihood Education Teachers Performance
Authors
Department of Home Economics Education and Family Life, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)
Department of Home Economics Education and Family Life, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100420
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 5296-5338
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-02
Accepted: 2025-12-08
Published: 2025-12-15
Abstract
This study examined the levels of professional development, digital literacy, and performance of Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) teachers in public secondary schools within the Municipality of Maramag, Bukidnon. Using a validated researcher-made questionnaire and employing descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression analysis, the study explored how key factors such as collaboration, digital competence, and institutional support influence teacher performance. Results revealed that TLE teachers demonstrated advanced professional development, especially in collaborative leadership and shared vision. However, limited access to technological and fiscal support hindered the full impact of professional learning. Teachers also demonstrated strong digital literacy, particularly in productivity and perceived importance, but had moderate confidence in using advanced tools, underscoring the need for more targeted, hands-on digital training. Teacher performance, as assessed using the IPCRF, was consistently rated very satisfactory, with strengths in assessment and professional growth. Correlation analysis showed that supportive conditions and digital productivity were positively and significantly related to teacher performance. Regression analysis identified digital productivity as the only significant predictor. The findings emphasized the importance of equipping TLE teachers with relevant digital tools, supportive working environments, and practical training aligned with their instructional needs. These insights offer actionable guidance for school leaders and policymakers aiming to strengthen teacher effectiveness through sustainable professional development and meaningful digital integration.
Keywords
collaborative leadership, instructional technology
Downloads
References
1. Acedo, C., & Hughes, C. (2020). Digital literacy for educators: Developing competencies for teaching in the digital age. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1973–1988. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abalayan, L. R., & Santos, M. J. (2023). Resource challenges and instructional practices of TLE teachers in public secondary schools. Philippine Journal of Technology and Vocational Education, 5(1), 30–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Almodovar, M. C., & Tugade, J. A. (2023). Strengthening instructional practices through shared values in Technology and Livelihood Education. Philippine Journal of Teacher Education, 9(2), 57–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Anderson, L. (2023). Challenges in implementing professional development programs in secondary schools. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(2), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Austria, R. M., & Sabio, C. B. (2021). Digital literacy and emotional readiness among secondary public school teachers. Journal of Philippine Educational Leadership, 7(1), 42–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Avalos, B. (2018). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Avalos-Bevan, B., Louzano, G., & Torres, A. (2018). Systemic supports for sustained professional learning: A regional case study. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9302-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Aydin, Selami. (2018). The role of digital literacy in reducing digital anxiety in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117715738 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Baladad, R. R., & Labitad, G. F. (2024). Teachers’ digital literacy skills and teaching practices among public school teachers [Unpublished study]. Balingoan District, Misamis Oriental. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ballesteros, C., & Dela Peña, J. (2023). Assessment strategies of TLE teachers in Philippine secondary schools. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 7(2), 34–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Balyer, A., & Özcan, K. (2022). Shared leadership and its impacts on teachers' job satisfaction and innovative practices. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211013352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L. A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Bautista, M. A., & Soriano, R. C. (2024). Enhancing school-home collaboration through digital reporting tools in Philippine public schools. Journal of Educational Technology and Practice, 5(1), 19–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. BCcampus. (2023). Digital literacy and resilience: How can professional development prepare instructors to succeed in changing times? BCcampus Reports. Retrieved from https://bccampus.ca/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Bernardo, M. C., Reyes, A. R., & Villanueva, J. M. (2025). Digital literacy and performance of public high school teachers: A focus on practical application and productivity tools. Philippine Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.5555/pjet.2025.15.1.45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Cabero-Almenara, J., & Llorente-Cejudo, M. C. (2020). ICT training of teachers: A key factor to improve education with technology. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00219-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Cakir, Hasan, & Karal, Hasan. (2018). Reducing teacher anxiety through professional development programs on digital literacy. Computers & Education, 116, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Cancio, L. D., Magno, K. E., & Flores, P. J. (2024). Institutional support and teacher performance in the Philippine basic education sector. International Journal of Educational Management and Policy, 18(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.4444/ijemp.2024.18.2.112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Candilasa, J. (2025). e-teacher professional development course in oral communication for senior high school. Journal of Harbin Engineering University (JHEU), 46(1), 190-198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Helms, J. V. (2016). Professional learning communities in STEM: Improving student achievement and teacher perceptions. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 17(1), 31–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Castillo, M., & Dela Peña, R. (2019). Teaching performance and instructional competence of TLE teachers in selected secondary schools in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(2), 34–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Chien, Chia-Hua; Chen, Chih-Hsien; & Jheng, Hao-Ren. (2018). The relationship between teachers' technology anxiety and use of instructional technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(5), 824–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Choudhary, H., & Bansal, N. (2022). Addressing digital divide through digital literacy training programs: A systematic literature review. Digital Education Review, 41, 224–248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Creswell, John W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Cruz, M., & Ballesteros, L. (2021). Digital literacy and teacher preparedness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Philippine Education and Technology, 12(1), 33–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Cruz, R. V., & Serrano, M. C. (2019). Assessing public school teachers' digital literacy and confidence in technology integration. Philippine Journal of Education Studies, 34(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Dela Cruz, M. T., & Umali, C. V. (2021). Collaborative teaching practices among TLE educators: A basis for improved instruction. Philippine Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(1), 45–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Delos Santos, R. J., & Yu, M. T. (2023). Digital integration in TLE: Exploring the role of productivity tools in teaching efficiency. Journal of Technology and Livelihood Education, 9(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.3333/jtle.2023.9.2.89 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Department for Education (2016). Standards for teachers’ professional development. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Department of Education (DepEd). (2016). *DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016: The Learning Action Cell as a K to 12 Basic Education Program School-Based Continuing Professional Development Strategy for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning*. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Department of Education (DepEd). (2017). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017 – National Adoption and Implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Department of Education (DepEd). (2017). Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Department of Education (DepEd). (2019). Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Department of Education (DepEd). (2019). Results-Based Performance Management System Manual. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Department of Education (DepEd). (2020). Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020–2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Department of Education (DepEd). (2022). DepEd Digital Rise Program: Empowering learners through technology integration. Quezon City: DepEd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Department of Education (DepEd). (2022). Digital Rise Program: Empowering learners through technology. Department of Education Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Department of Education (DepEd). (2022). Gender-Responsive Basic Education Policy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Department of Education (DepEd). (2022). NEAP Transformation Framework. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Department of Education (DepEd). (2023). ICT Development and Readiness Report 2023: Insights from field implementation. Department of Education, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Desimone, L.M., Garet, M. (2015). Best Practices in Teachers' Professional Development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252-263. DOI: 10.25115/psye.v7i3.515 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Dizon, R. G., Santos, M. A., & Lim, J. F. (2021). Digital literacy and technology utilization among public school teachers in the new normal. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jerp.2021.11.2.045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. DuFour, R., & Fullan, M. (2020). Cultures Built to Last: Systemic PLCs at Work. Solution Tree Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., Many, T., & Mattos, M. (2016). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (3rd ed.). Solution Tree. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. DuFour, Richard. (2015). In praise of professional learning communities. Educational Leadership. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. DuFour, Richard, & Fullan, Michael. (2015). Cultures built to last: Systemic PLCs at work. Solution Tree Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Education Commission II. (2024). Systematic review of professional development programs for teachers in the Philippines. Quezon City: EdCom II. Retrieved from https://edcom2.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Emerald Insight. (2023). Role of collective learning in PLCs in Namibia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Emerald Insight. (2023). Role of organizational support in PLC development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Espinosa, L., Reyes, J., & De Leon, A. (2023). Digital literacy as a key enabler in blended learning environments [Reference summary]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Fernandez, J. P., & Rivera, L. M. (2019). The impact of technology in education. Journal of Educational Studies, 45(1), 10-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Flores, M. (2025). Instructional competence and its impact on the performance of public junior high school Technology and Livelihood Education teachers. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3), 120–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Francisco, J. L., De Vera, M. A., & Cagalingan, M. E. (2024). Digital self-efficacy and its influence on the integration of educational technology among secondary teachers. Southeast Asian Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 22–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Ganal, N. N., & Guiab, M. R. (2020). Differentiated instruction practices among public school teachers. International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 11(2), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Garcia, A. L., & Carreon, R. M. (2021). Access to technology and teaching effectiveness among TLE teachers in rural schools. Southeast Asian Journal of Education, 7(3), 112–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Garcia, E. R., & Ramos, M. F. (2023). Enhancing literacy and numeracy integration in TLE: Challenges and innovations. Philippine Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 45–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Garcia, G. G., & Santos, S. S. (2020). The impact of early childhood education. Journal of Applied Psychology, 25(3), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Gray, J. A., Kruse, S. D., & Tarter, J. C. (2016). Developing professional learning communities through enabling school structures, collegial trust, academic emphasis, and collective efficacy. Educational Research Applications. Gavin Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Gay, Lorrie R., Mills, Geoffrey E., & Airasian, Peter. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Ghavifekr, Simin, et al. (2016). The impact of digital divide on students' digital literacy and academic success. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 12(3), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Gonzales, R. M., & Magsayo, E. J. (2024). Enhancing professional development through collaborative practices among secondary TLE teachers. International Journal of Educational Development in the Philippines, 18(2), 22–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Gutierez, S. B. (2019). Exploring the experiences of teachers in professional development: A case of a Philippine public school. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n4.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. Hallinger, P., & Wang, W. C. (2020). Assessing instructional leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 620–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19897854 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. Hallinger, Philip, & Heck, Ronald H. (2015). Leadership and teacher professional learning. Journal of Educational Administration. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2014-0038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Hamilton, B. (2015). The teacher leadership process: Attempting change. This examines how teacher leaders attempt to change teaching practices among colleagues in urban schools. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. Harris, A., Jones, M., & Huffman, J. B. (Eds.). (2017). Teachers leading educational reform: The power of professional learning communities (1st ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
74. Harris, Alma. (2014). Distributed leadership: Developing tomorrow's leaders. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(5), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214523018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
75. Hatlevik, O. E., & Christophersen, K. (2023). Teachers’ digital competence and its impact on teaching and learning in secondary schools. Computers & Education, 196, 104674. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
76. Hattie, J. (2020). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 1,500 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
77. Hobson, A., Ashby, P., Malderez, A., & Tomlinson, P. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don't. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
78. Hochberg, E. D., & Desimone, L. M. (2010). Professional development in the accountability context: Building capacity to achieve standards. Educational Psychologist, 45, 89-106. doi:10.1080/00461521003703052. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
79. Hord, S. M. (2019). Professional learning communities: Educators working together to improve student achievement. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
80. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2018). The influence of shared leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment and engagement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(5), 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217717260 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
81. Javier, M. R., & Alayon, R. S. (2021). Teacher confidence and digital technology use in the classroom: Evidence from Philippine secondary schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 6(3), 74–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
82. Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T., & Smith, Karl A. (2016). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 27(1), 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
83. Johnson, R., & Brown, T. (2023). Bridging the digital literacy gap in teacher education. International Journal of Teacher Development, 45(2), 89–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
84. Ju-Zaveroni, Y., & Lee, S. (2023). Online language learning in participatory culture: Digital pedagogy practices in the post-pandemic era. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
85. Karagul, E., Aydin, S., & Bayram, H. (2021). Enhancing digital literacy through online education: A case study in the pandemic era. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 37–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
86. Kennedy, Aileen. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of mechanisms and contexts. Professional Development in Education, 42(5), 615–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1005249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
87. Khalifa, M., Gooden, M. A., & Davis, J. E. (2019). culturally responsive school leadership. Harvard Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
88. Kustec, S., Skrbinjek, V., Aberšek, B., & Flogie, A. (2024). Innovative professional learning communities and sustainable education practices through digital transformation. Sustainability, 16(14), 6250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
89. Layug, D. L., Dela Cruz, M. C., & Navarro, J. E. (2022). Digital literacy and confidence among public school teachers in the implementation of blended learning. International Journal of Pedagogical Development, 4(1), 15–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
90. Learning Policy Institute. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
91. Lee, K. (2021). Enhancing mid-career teachers' digital literacy through professional development: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 245–260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
92. Leithwood, Kenneth, & Sun, Jingping. (2018). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How does shared leadership make a difference? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1518745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
93. Lister, K., Riva, S., & McFarlane, C. (2022). Positive digital practices: Supporting learner identities and mental wellbeing in technology-enhanced education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 5(831). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
94. Liu, M., Kang, J., McKelroy, E., & Roper, K. (2016). Investigating the impact of digital literacy on students' online learning experiences and anxiety. Educational Technology & Society, 19(4), 119–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
95. Liu, M., Clevenger, T. E., & Xiang, D. (2020). Technophobia and digital anxiety among adults: Implications for digital literacy programs. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1646510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
96. Llego, J. P., Ramos, E. L., & Aquino, N. D. (2022). Teacher training and its limitations: A survey of Filipino educators’ perceptions on support and implementation. Journal of Educational Reform in Developing Nations, 7(3), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.2222/jerdn.2022.7.3.135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
97. Llego, J. R., & Valera, M. A. (2023). Enhancing curriculum relevance through teacher collaboration in TLE instruction. Philippine Journal of Technical and Vocational Education, 11(1), 25–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
98. Llego, M. A. (2020). ICT integration in the Philippine education system. TeacherPH. https://www.teacherph.com/ict-integration-philippine-education/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
99. Looney, Janet. (2017). Professional development for teachers: Reducing digital anxiety through training programs. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1353742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
100. Lopez, K. (2020). The impact of teacher’s collaboration on TLE teachers in urban schools. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
101. Magsambol, B. (2021, February 10). TLE teachers serve as digital coaches in public schools. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/in-depth/tle-teachers-digital-coaches-public-schools/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
102. Manalili, A. (2022). The role of teaching methods in facilitating skills diffusion in technology and livelihood education (TLE): A study among bachelor of technology and livelihood education faculty. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
103. Mendoza, J. T., & Sevilla, M. E. (2019). Anxiety and digital technology use among public school teachers: Implications for ICT integration. Philippine Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 5(2), 18–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
104. Miller, A., Smith, B., & Taylor, C. (2020). Integrating technology into pedagogical practices: The role of digital literacy in professional growth. Educational Research Review, 31, 100320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
105. Navarro, M. L. C. (2017). Time management practices, job performance and satisfaction of Technology and Livelihood Education-Home Economics (TLE-HE) teachers in the Division of City Schools, Manila (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Library of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
106. Naz, S., & Dwivedi, S. K. (2023). Integrating digital tools in the classroom: Enhancing teaching effectiveness and student engagement. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6(8), 3125–3132. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0825.3125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
107. NEDA & UNICEF. (2021). *Education sector rapid assessment: The Philippines’ response to the COVID-19 pandemic*. National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). https://www.unicef.org/philippines/reports/education-sector-rapid-assessment [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
108. Ng, W. (2019). Conceptualizing digital literacy for the 21st century. Education Research International, 2019, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
109. Ng, W. (2022). Digital literacy in education: Beyond basic ICT skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(4), 1023–1040. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
110. Ngang, T. K., Yunus, H. M., & Hashim, N. H. (2021). Collaborative school leadership and its impact on teacher development. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(5), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2020-0255 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
111. Nikolopoulou, K., & Gialamas, V. (2016). Barriers to ICT use in high schools: Greek teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0052-z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
112. Noltemeyer, A., Palmer, K., James, A. G., & Wiechman, S. (2019). School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS): A synthesis of existing research. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 7(4), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2018.1425169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
113. Onsrud, K. J. (2015). The relationship between collaboration and collective efficacy in two Wisconsin high schools (Doctoral dissertation, Edgewood College). Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
114. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Students, computers, and learning: Making the connection. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
115. Perez, L. M., & Soriano, A. F. (2024). Aligning teacher philosophies with national standards: Implications for performance and student engagement. Journal of Educational Research and Practice in Asia, 6(1), 22–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
116. Perez, L., & Medina, J. (2021). Instructional practices and performance of TLE teachers in relation to students’ skills development. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 3(1), 66–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
117. Philippine EJournals. (2022). Digital literacy of elementary teachers and its implications on teaching performance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
118. Pillay, Hitendra (2017). Teacher anxiety and digital literacy: An analysis of South African educators. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
119. Ramadevi, K., Ansari, M., & Khan, F. (2023). Collaborative learning in digital environments: Enhancing critical thinking and social skills. Digital Education Review, 45, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2024.45.43-49 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
120. Ramirez, C. A., & Antonio, H. B. (2023). Supportive leadership and school structures: Predictors of successful DepEd program implementation. Philippine Journal of School Leadership and Management, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1212/pjslm.2023.6.1.21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
121. Reyes, M. T., & Molina, R. B. (2021). The role of PLCs in improving assessment and instructional planning in Philippine secondary schools. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 7(3), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2021.73.150.157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
122. Reyes, P., & Dela Cruz, J. (2024). Lesson study as a professional development model for teachers in Quirino Province. American Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 34–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
123. Rini, R., Syafriandi, S., & Putri, N. (2022). The development of digital literacy competence among university students in the post-pandemic era. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, 102038. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
124. Sahin, Selcuk, & Sadi, Sevket. (2017). Reducing digital anxiety in students through digital literacy workshops. Computers & Education, 111, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
125. Salvador, A., & Dela Cruz, M. (2023). Urban and rural disparities in ICT integration in Philippine schools. Southeast Asian Journal of Education, 18(1), 59–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
126. Santos, P. (2022). Challenges affecting the teaching performance of TLE teachers in public secondary schools. Journal of Education and Human Development, 11(4), 45–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
127. Schunk, D. H., & Greene, J. A. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
128. SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2021). GURO21 program evaluation. SEAMEO Regional Center for Educational Innovation and Technology. https://www.seameo-innotech.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/GURO21-Program-Evaluation-Report.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
129. Selwyn, Neil. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
130. Senge, P. M. (2014). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education (Naoko Richters, Trans.). Eiji Shuppan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
131. Shin, Na Young, & Kang, Mi Hwa. (2014). Teacher confidence in using technology: The case of Korean teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 19(4), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9244-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
132. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
133. Smith, E., & Yasukawa, K. (2017). What makes a good VET teacher? Views of Australian VET teachers and students. International Journal of Training Research, 15(1), 23-40. doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2017.1355301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
134. Springer Journal. (2020). Frameworks for teacher digital literacy and its impact on educational outcomes. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
135. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
136. Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment? The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(1), 54–65. Retrieved from ERIC [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
137. Tomlinson, C. A. (2021). How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
138. Tondeur, Jo, et al. (2017). Digital literacy and teacher anxiety: An exploration of the factors contributing to technology integration in education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
139. Trinidad, C. D., & Magno, E. R. (2023). Exploring the role of digital anxiety in teachers' technology integration practices. Southeast Asian Journal of Educational Innovation, 9(1), 67–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
140. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). Digital learning and transformation of education: Recommendations for teacher professional development. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
141. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). Digital literacy in education: Policy brief. Paris: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
142. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). Digital learning in rural schools: Challenges and opportunities. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
143. UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report. (2023). Digital literacy assessment [Background paper for the 2023 GEM Report on Technology in Education]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
144. Val, A., & López-Bueno, L. (2024). Bridging the digital divide in teacher education: Challenges and strategies. Journal of Digital Education and Learning, 52(1), 112–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
145. Valderama, C. B. (2022). Digital literacy of secondary public school teachers in the implementation of the Learning Continuity Plan. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 77–91. https://apjer.com/article/valderama-2022-digital-literacy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
146. Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Peters, O. (2015). The influence of digital literacy on students' anxiety in online learning. Computers & Education, 82, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
147. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2018). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
148. Villanueva, A. L., & de Guzman, M. R. (2020). From reluctance to confidence: Trends in ICT anxiety among Filipino educators. Asia Pacific Journal of Education and Digital Learning, 4(2), 25–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
149. Villanueva, C. L. (2018). Technology Education. Manila. Rex Book Store. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
150. Voogt, J., Knezek, G., & Pareja Roblin, N. (2015). Research-informed strategies to address educational challenges in a digitally networked world. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 619-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9430-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
151. Wang, H., Hsu, T. I., Reeves, T. C., & Coster, D. (2014). Professional development to enhance teachers’ practices in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) as cognitive tools: Lessons learned from a design-based research study. Computers & Education, 79, 106-122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
152. Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
153. Wesselink, A. A., Jones, B. B., & Smith, C. C. (2021). The impact of technology on education. Journal of Educational Research, 15(2), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
154. World Bank. (2023). Post-pandemic education recovery: The role of digital tools. World Bank Education Brief. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study