Implementing Inclusive Education for Learners with Special Needs: Exploring Non-SpEd Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Nangka National High School

Authors

Maria Regil E. Vasquez

Cebu Technological University – Main Campus, Cebu City (Philippines)

Lilibeth C. Pinili

Cebu Technological University – Main Campus, Cebu City (Philippines)

Raymond C. Espina

Cebu Technological University – Main Campus, Cebu City (Philippines)

Janine Joy L. Tenerife-Cañete

Cebu Technological University – Main Campus, Cebu City (Philippines)

Reylan G. Capuno

Cebu Technological University – Main Campus, Cebu City (Philippines)

Randy C. Mangubat

Cebu Technological University – Main Campus, Cebu City (Philippines)

Anabelle T. Pantaleon

Cebu Technological University – Main Campus, Cebu City (Philippines)

Veronica O. Calasang

Cebu Technological University – Main Campus, Cebu City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100454

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 5794-5809

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-06

Accepted: 2025-12-13

Published: 2025-12-18

Abstract

Inclusive education, mandated by the Philippine Republic Act 11650, remains unevenly implemented, particularly in mainstream public school settings where non-Special Education (non-SpEd) teachers often serve as the first line of support for learners with special needs. This study assessed the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAPs) of non-SpEd teachers at Nangka National High School regarding the implementation of inclusive education and examined the correlation among these variables. Utilizing a quantitative, descriptive-correlational design, the research gathered data from 30 purposively selected non-SpEd teachers using a validated survey questionnaire. Statistical analysis included the Weighted Mean to determine the level of KAPs and Pearson’s r correlation to test the relationships. The overall results showed that the teachers demonstrated a moderate level of knowledge (mean = 2.81), a positive attitude (mean = 2.70), and inclusive practices (mean = 3.24) toward inclusive education. A strong positive correlation was found between knowledge and attitude (r = 0.628, p < .001), suggesting that increased knowledge leads to more favorable perspectives. Moreover, the study revealed a very weak and statistically insignificant negative relationship between attitude and practices (r = -0.116, p = 0.542). This indicates a gap where positive intentions do not consistently translate into the effective and observable application of inclusive classroom strategies. Finally, the study also showed a weak and statistically insignificant negative correlation between knowledge and practices (r = -0.167, p = 0.379). This means that a teacher’s level of knowledge about inclusive education does not necessarily correspond to the frequency or quality of their inclusive practices. The findings emphasize that while teachers are willing, external or structural factors may hinder consistent implementation. Based on these results, a School-Based Action Plan is proposed to strengthen inclusive education through targeted capacity-building, peer mentoring, and policy integration.

Keywords

Special Education, Learners with Special Needs, Inclusive Education, Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, Non-SpEd Teachers

Downloads

References

1. Abantas, D. (2022). Teachers’ attitudes and pedagogical skills in inclusive education: A Philippine perspective. Philippine Journal of Special Education, 14(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agboola, B. O. (2024). Teachers’ academic qualifications and readiness for inclusive education: A correlational study. Journal of Inclusive Education Research, 6(2), 45–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2019). Improving schools, developing inclusion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429440708 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Albaladejo, I. M., & Giménez, A. M. (2023). Teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education: The role of age and teaching experience. Education Sciences, 13(3), 271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Alkhateeb, A. A., Hadidi, M. S., & Alkhateeb, J. M. (2023). Teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education in Southeast Asia: A comparative study. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5(1), 100258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Arias-Pastor, L., Martínez-Rodríguez, R., & Sánchez, J. (2024). Teacher training and self-efficacy in inclusive education: Evidence from European classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(3), 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2212345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Araña, L. A. (2022). Challenges encountered in the implementation of Special Education (SPED) program: Basis for plan of action (DepEd E-Saliksik research report). Department of Education. https://e-saliksik.deped.gov.ph/challenges-encountered-in-the-implementation-of-special-education-SpEd-program-basis-for-plan-of-action/?download=5579 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2022). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 37(4), 541–558. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2021.1900951 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Baek, C., Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2024). Exploring teachers’ self-efficacy and willingness to provide accommodations in teaching students with autism: An intervention study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, 103458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.103458 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Charitaki, G., Kourti, I., Gregory, J. L., Ozturk, M., Ismail, Z., Alevriadou, A., Soulis, S.-G., Sakici, Ş., & Demirel, C. (2024). Teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education: A cross-national study. Trends in Psychology, 32, 1120–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-022-00240-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Commission on Higher Education. (2023). CHEDRO-III Memorandum No. 159, s. 2023 – Foundation of Special and Inclusive Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. https://chedro3.ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CHEDRO-III-MEMORANDUM-No.-159-series-of-2023.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. DepEd Order No. 44, s. 2021. (2021). Policy Guidelines on the Provision of Education Programs and Services for Learners with Disabilities in the K to 12 Basic Education Program. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Department of Education. (2022). DepEd Order No. 023, s. 2022 – Child Find Policy for Learners with Disabilities Towards Inclusive Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/DO_s2022_023.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Diao, M., & Liu, L. (2022). Gender differences in teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 920381. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920381 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Drieu, D. (2023, October 11). Inclusive Education and Early Years Baseline Report 2023. Government of Jersey. https://tinyurl.com/yrupmmtt [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Faltaldo, P., Rivera, T., & Gomez, M. (2016). Correlational research design in educational studies: Guidelines and applications. Philippine Educational Review, 18(1), 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Forlin, C., & Chambers, D. (2021). Teacher preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(3), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2020.1832559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Greco, G. (2018). Inclusive education: Adapting to diverse learners in contemporary classrooms. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(4), 22–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Habibnezhad Allameh, A., Hashemi Nosratabad, T., & Ghaffari, A. (2024). Effectiveness of brain-based learning training in psychopathology: Cognitive and emotional outcomes of learning in student tutors. Journal of Research in Psychopathology, 5(17), 9–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. https://doi.org/10.22098/jrp.2024.13688.1202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Kimhi, Y., & Bar Nir, A. (2025). Teacher training in transition to inclusive education. Frontiers in Education, 10, 122–135. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1510314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Lindsay, G. (2021). Inclusive education: A critical perspective. British Journal of Special Education, 48(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Masongsong, J. M., Lopres, J. R., Aguirre, M. M., Lopres, G. M., Enriquez, D. M., Bautista, F. B., Niadas, G. Y., & Virtusio, J. D. (2023). Level of teachers’ training in inclusive education and their sense of efficacy. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 6(5), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i5p108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mthetwa, G. S. (2008). Principals’ knowledge and attitudes regarding inclusive education: Implications for curriculum and assessment. Journal of Education for All, 12(1), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Navas-Bonilla, C. R., Guerra-Arango, J. A., Oviedo-Guado, D. A., & Murillo-Noriega, D. E. (2025). Inclusive education through technology: A systematic review of types, tools and characteristics. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1527851. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1527851 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement: A sociological approach. Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Pagaduan, J., & Natividad, L. (2025). Adapting teaching to a diverse classroom: Perspectives from Filipino educators. Philippine Journal of Education, 49(1), 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Philippine Department of Education. (2020). Inclusive Education Framework for Learners with Disabilities. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Raguindin, P. Z. J., & Li, Y. P. (2025). Key competencies of Filipino teachers for inclusive education: Insights from a Delphi study. SAGE Open, 15(3), 21582440251351731. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251351731 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Republic of the Philippines. (1992, March 24). Republic Act No. 7277: An Act providing for the rehabilitation, self-development and self-reliance of disabled person and their integration into the mainstream of society and for other purposes. Official Gazette. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1992/03/24/republic-act-no-7277/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Republic of the Philippines. (2022, March 11). Republic Act No. 11650: An Act instituting a policy of inclusion and services for learners with disabilities in support of inclusive education... Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2022/03/11/republic-act-no-11650/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Roslyakova, E., & Sokolova, N. (2024). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education in school. Psychological Science and Education (PsyJournals.ru), 29(5), 84–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. https://doi.org/10.47636/pse.2024.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Saabi, N. (2025). A review of assistive technology in special education: Teacher readiness and implementation challenges. Education Sciences, 15(4), 210–223. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/112/1/45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Selenius, H., & Hau, K. (2021). A scoping review on the psychometric properties of the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices (TEIP) scale. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(4), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2021.1884567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(3), 243–257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603111003663234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2020). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12513 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Tzivinikou, S., & Kagkara, D. (2022). Exploring inclusive teaching practices across grade levels. International Journal of Educational Studies, 15(4), 89–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. UNESCO. (2021). Inclusive education: Ensuring education for all. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374136 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2020). Towards inclusion in education: Status, trends and challenges. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374246 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. UNICEF. (2017). Inclusive education for children with disabilities: Guidance note. United Nations Children’s Fund. https://www.unicef.org/reports/inclusive-education-children-disabilities-2017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. World Bank Group. (2025). Disability inclusion in education: Global report 2025. World Bank Publications. https://tinyurl.com/yeyytw86 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles