Supporting Teachers toward Preparation and Use of Gender-Responsive Teaching and Learning Materials: The Influence of School Leadership and Management in Pre and Primary Education in Lindi Region.

This study sought to investigate the role of school leadership and management in supporting teachers towards preparation and use of gender-responsive teaching and learning materials in pre and primary schools. The study was conducted in four districts of Lindi region Tanzania in which the study population was 24,700 education stakeholders. A sample size of 1059 respondents including 344 teachers, 49 head teachers, 196 school committee members, 392 pupils, 24 District School Quality Assurance Officers, 49 Ward Education officers, and 4 District Pre and Primary Education Officers was selected for the study through purposive, simple random and quota sampling techniques. The study employed a convergent research design within the framework of a mixed research approach in which data were collected by using questionnaire, interview, focus group discussions, observations and documentary review methods. The findings revealed that, school leadership and management plays a significant role in supporting teachers toward preparation of gender-responsive schemes of work and lesson plans; significantly supports teachers in preparing gender-responsive teaching and learning aids; and significantly supports teachers towards preparation of gender-responsive lesson notes. Based on the findings, the study recommends for an adoption of a more structured approach to integrating gender-responsive pedagogical practices in teaching and learning; making gender-responsive material preparation a mandatory component of teacher training and supervision frameworks; ensure ongoing professional development for teachers, ensure sufficient instructional resources and clear guidelines on implementing gender-responsive teaching.

School leadership; school management; gender-responsive

1. Abraha, M., Dagnew, A., & Seifu, A. (2023). Gender-responsive pedagogy practices: Secondary school science teachers in Ethiopia. Journal of International Women's Studies: 25(1), Article 20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. AKU, (2020). Gender equity report. Aga Khan Development Network. Retrieved from https://the.akdn/en/resources-media/resources/publications/aku--gender-equity-report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ananga, E. (2021). Gender-responsive pedagogy for teaching and learning: The Practice in Ghana’s initial teacher education programme. Creative Education, 12, 848-864. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Banerjee, S. (2024). Beyond the chalkboard: crafting gender-responsive classrooms through teacher training mastery. International Journal of Pedagogy & Curriculum, 31(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Buabeng, I., & Amo-Darko, B. (2024). Bridging the gap: Enhancing equitable access to quality education for marginalized communities in Ghana. American Journal of Educational Research, 12(11), 427-438. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Canuto, P. P., & Espique, F. (2023). Gender equality in science classrooms: Examining the implementation of gender responsive approach and its impact on science education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 659-678. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chabalala, G., & Naidoo, P. (2021). Teachers' and middle managers' experiences of principals' instructional leadership towards improving curriculum delivery in schools. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 11(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Clark, R., & Clark, V. P. (2022). The use of mixed methods to advance positive psychology: a methodological review. International Journal of Wellbeing, 12(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches, vol. 1 (1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach (5th Ed). SAGE Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Daniëls, E., Hondeghem, A., & Heystek, J. (2020). School leaders' and teachers' leadership perceptions: differences and similarities. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 645-660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. De Matthews, D., Carrola, P., Reyes, P., & Knight, D. (2021). School leadership burnout and job-related stress: Recommendations for district administrators and principals. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 94(4), 159-167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Duma, M. G. (2022). Gender mainstreaming plan for gender-responsive public schools. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 5(3), 144-161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Flores, C., & Bagwell, J. (2021). Social Justice Leadership as Inclusion: Promoting Inclusive Practices to Ensure Equity for All. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. García-Holgado, A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). A model for bridging the gender gap in STEM in higher education institutions. In Women in STEM in higher education: Good practices of attraction, access and retainment in higher education (pp. 1-19). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. GES (2018). The Gender Handbook for Teaching Practice Mentors: A Guide for Implementing Gender-responsive Pedagogy, Policies and Practices during Teaching Practice. Accra: GES. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kamala, K., & Kamalakar, G. (2024). Gender Equality and Human Rights: A Contemporary Analysis. Int. J. Political Sci, 10, 31-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Krišová, D., & Polánková, L. (2020). Towards gender–sensitive education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Larsson, P., & Löwstedt, J. (2023). Distributed school leadership: Making sense of the educational infrastructure. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(1), 138-156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Laursen, S., & Austin, A. E. (2020). Building Gender Equity in the Academy: Institutional strategies for change. Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Leal Filho, W., Kovaleva, M., Tsani, S., Țîrcă, D. M., Shiel, C., Dinis, M. A. P., ... & Tripathi, S. (2022). Promoting gender equality across the sustainable development goals. Environment, Development and Sustainability [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Leithwood, K. (2021). A review of evidence about equitable school leadership. Education sciences, 11(8), 377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lewis, M., Bromley, K., Sutton, C. J., McCray, G., Myers, H. L., & Lancaster, G. A. (2021). Determining sample size for progression criteria for pragmatic pilot RCTs: the hypothesis test strikes back! Pilot and feasibility studies, 7(1), 40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lopez, M. S., & Andal, E. Z. (2024). Gender-Responsive Pedagogy and Attitude toward Sensitivity in Basic Education. TWIST, 19(3), 583-588. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Losioki, B. E., & Mdee, H. K. (2023). The contribution of the hidden curriculum to gender inequality in teaching and learning materials: Experiences from Tanzania. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 9(2), 54–58. 10.20448/Edu. v9i2.4706. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mafuleka, T. (2023). Gender Responsiveness of the pre-service primary school teachers' training program: the case of four teacher-training colleges in Malawi (Doctoral dissertation, Mzuzu University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mestry, R., & Govindasamy, V. (2021). The perceptions of school management teams and teachers of the principal’s instructional leadership role in managing curriculum changes. Interchange, 52(4), 545-560. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mhewa, M. M., Bhalalusesa, E. P., & Kafanabo, E. (2020). Secondary school teachers’ understanding of gender - responsive pedagogy in bridging inequalities of students’ learning in Tanzania. Papers in Education and Development, 38(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mihaila, R., & Lousada, I. (2024). Teaching gender issues: A comparative overview on equality in academia in South Eastern Europe. Revista Ártemis: Estudos de Gênero, Feminismo e Sexualidades, 37(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. MoEST (2018). The 2018/19 Education Sector Performance Report, Strengthening Education Management and Accountability to Improve Learning Outcomes for All. MoEST. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. MoEVT. (2014). School improvement toolkit- a practical guide for head teachers. July, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Muasya, J. N. (2021). Gender responsive pedagogy and early childhood teacher education: A study of pre-primary school teachers in Nairobi County, Kenya. Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies, 6(3), 101-108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nkya, H., & Kibona, I. (2024). Systematic literature review of gender equity and social inclusion in primary education for teachers in Tanzania: assessing status and future directions. Discover Education, 3(1), 122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Óskarsdóttir, E., Donnelly, V., Turner-Cmuchal, M., & Florian, L. (2020). Inclusive school leaders–their role in raising the achievement of all learners. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5), 521-537. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Rarieya, J., Bakuza, F., & Wango, N. (2024). Strengthening education systems through development of champion teacher: The Experience of Implementation of the F4L Project in East Africa. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy., 5(4), 32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Rarieya, J., Wango, N., & Biswalo, T. (2025). Shaping Inclusive Futures: Gender-Responsive Practices in Pre-Primary Teacher Training Colleges in Tanzania and Uganda. Global Journal of Educational Studies, 11(1), 40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Riddel, M., & Zulfikar, I. R. (2024). The Role of innovative leadership in transforming student learning effectiveness: A Review of best practices and future directions. Development: Studies in Educational Management and Leadership, 3(1), 35-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sliwka, A., Klopsch, B., Beigel, J., & Tung, L. (2024). Transformational leadership for deeper learning: shaping innovative school practices for enhanced learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 62(1), 103-121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Sruthi, S. (2024). Promoting gender sensitivity in education: Addressing key areas for an inclusive future. Journal of Education and Research, 8(2), 45-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. UNESCO. (2018). Gender-Responsive Pedagogy: A Teacher’s Handbook. Paris: UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. UNESCO. (2020). Gender report, A new generation: 25 years of efforts for gender equality in education, Global Education Monitoring Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Vilches, V. M. (2022). Exploring the hidden curriculum: diversifying gender representation in music theory pedagogy (Master's thesis, Texas Christian University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study