Scaffolding Voices: Dynamic Assessment for Process-Oriented L2 Writing
Authors
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100542
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 6971-6986
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-09
Accepted: 2025-12-16
Published: 2025-12-23
Abstract
Second language (L2) writing instruction faces global challenges: overreliance on static summative assessment (prioritizing products over processes), insufficient personalized feedback in large classrooms (e.g., 40–50 students in China), and students’ struggles with pre-writing planning and revision (Liu & Qi, 2024; Ning, 2021). Process-oriented approaches lack aligned assessment tools, while Dynamic Assessment (DA)—rooted in Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory (SCT) and Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)—integrates instruction and assessment via contingent mediation (Lantolf & Poehner, 2004).
Keywords
Dynamic Assessment; L2 Writing; Sociocultural Theory
Downloads
References
1. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–483. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Afshari, H., Amirian, Z., & Tavakoli, M. (2020). Applying group dynamic assessment procedures to support EFL writing development: Learner achievement, learners’ and teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Writing Research, 11(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 36(4), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01065.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Davin, K. (2013). Group dynamic assessment and instructional conversations in L2 grammar learning. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.1007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Guthke, J., Heinrich, A., & Caruso, M. (1986). The diagnostic program of “syntactical rule and vocabulary acquisition”: A contribution to the psychodiagnosis of foreign language learning. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances (pp. 127–152). Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. He, X. (2020). College English Teaching Guidelines (2020 version). Higher Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormouth, D. R., Hartfield, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Newbury House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kusumaningrum, R., & Karma, D. (2018). EFL students’ perceptions of dynamic assessment in writing classes. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 87–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Lan, Y., & Liu, X. (2010). Dynamic assessment in EFL writing classes: A case study. Journal of Foreign Language Education, 31(2), 55–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2007). Dynamic assessment: A teacher’s guide. CALPER Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Liu, Y., & Qi, L. (2024). Classroom management challenges in large-scale college English classes in China. Journal of Higher Education in China, 7(1), 67–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ning, Y. (2021). Alleviating EFL writing anxiety through dynamic assessment. System, 98, 102568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Shrestha, P. N. (2017). Dynamic assessment and genre-based pedagogy in L2 academic writing: A case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.02.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Shrestha, P. N., & Coffin, C. (2012). Writing teachers’ perception of feedback provision: Exploring teachers’ written feedback practice and orientation to feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.11.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Zhang, H. (2012). Interventionist DA in CET-4 writing preparation: A study of Chinese non-English majors. Foreign Language Education, 33(4), 67–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Zhang, H. (2023). Individualized mediation in dynamic assessment: Supporting EFL learners’ writing development. Journal of Asia TEFL, 20(2), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study