Scaffolding Voices: Dynamic Assessment for Process-Oriented L2 Writing

Authors

Feng Jinghan

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Noor Mala Ibrahim

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Pei Xiaoyu

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Wang Ying

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Zhang Mengjie

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100542

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 6971-6986

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-09

Accepted: 2025-12-16

Published: 2025-12-23

Abstract

Second language (L2) writing instruction faces global challenges: overreliance on static summative assessment (prioritizing products over processes), insufficient personalized feedback in large classrooms (e.g., 40–50 students in China), and students’ struggles with pre-writing planning and revision (Liu & Qi, 2024; Ning, 2021). Process-oriented approaches lack aligned assessment tools, while Dynamic Assessment (DA)—rooted in Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory (SCT) and Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)—integrates instruction and assessment via contingent mediation (Lantolf & Poehner, 2004).

Keywords

Dynamic Assessment; L2 Writing; Sociocultural Theory

Downloads

References

1. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–483. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afshari, H., Amirian, Z., & Tavakoli, M. (2020). Applying group dynamic assessment procedures to support EFL writing development: Learner achievement, learners’ and teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Writing Research, 11(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 36(4), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01065.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Davin, K. (2013). Group dynamic assessment and instructional conversations in L2 grammar learning. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.1007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Guthke, J., Heinrich, A., & Caruso, M. (1986). The diagnostic program of “syntactical rule and vocabulary acquisition”: A contribution to the psychodiagnosis of foreign language learning. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances (pp. 127–152). Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. He, X. (2020). College English Teaching Guidelines (2020 version). Higher Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormouth, D. R., Hartfield, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Newbury House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kusumaningrum, R., & Karma, D. (2018). EFL students’ perceptions of dynamic assessment in writing classes. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 87–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lan, Y., & Liu, X. (2010). Dynamic assessment in EFL writing classes: A case study. Journal of Foreign Language Education, 31(2), 55–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2007). Dynamic assessment: A teacher’s guide. CALPER Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Liu, Y., & Qi, L. (2024). Classroom management challenges in large-scale college English classes in China. Journal of Higher Education in China, 7(1), 67–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ning, Y. (2021). Alleviating EFL writing anxiety through dynamic assessment. System, 98, 102568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shrestha, P. N. (2017). Dynamic assessment and genre-based pedagogy in L2 academic writing: A case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.02.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Shrestha, P. N., & Coffin, C. (2012). Writing teachers’ perception of feedback provision: Exploring teachers’ written feedback practice and orientation to feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.11.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zhang, H. (2012). Interventionist DA in CET-4 writing preparation: A study of Chinese non-English majors. Foreign Language Education, 33(4), 67–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zhang, H. (2023). Individualized mediation in dynamic assessment: Supporting EFL learners’ writing development. Journal of Asia TEFL, 20(2), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles