Investigating Grammar Instruction in the ESL Classroom: A Dual Perspective Analysis of Teachers and Students

In an ESL class, teaching grammar involves demonstrating and practicing the language’s rules systematically, enabling learners to use the language correctly and communicate effectively as second-language speakers. This study aimed to explore ESL teachers’ and students’ perceptions of grammar instruction in an international school setting. The participants were six ESL teachers and 27 secondary students. A qualitative case study approach was used to examine how grammar is perceived, the strategies used to teach and learn it, and the challenges encountered in the classroom. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, and analysed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed five integrated themes for both teachers and students: (1) grammar as a foundation for communication, (2) grammar teaching and learning strategies, (3) engagement, motivation, and emotional responses to grammar learning, (4) challenges in grammar instruction and learning, and (5) learner autonomy in grammar learning. Results suggest that both teachers and students regard grammar as essential for language proficiency, and that interactive, contextualised, and student-centred approaches foster motivation, engagement, and independent learning in grammar instruction.

communicative approaches, ESL learners, grammar instruction

1. Abhishikta, A., Priya, C., Akolkar, A., Pathak, P. & Kumar, J.R. (2025). Effective Strategies for Teaching English Grammar in ESL Classrooms. YMER 24(05): 640–648. https://doi.org/10.37896/YMER24.05/45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abubakari, M. M. (2020). Communicative Competence: The Role of Grammar in Teaching English as a Second Language. South East Coastal Conference on Languages & Literatures (SECCLL). https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/seccll/2020/2020/28/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adeoye‐Olatunde, O. A., & Olenik, N. L. (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi‐structured interviews. Journal of the american college of clinical pharmacy, 4(10), 1358-1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Afrizal, J., Ahmad, A. & Salsabila, I.S. (2021). EFL University Students’ Perceptions of Effective Teaching Grammar. Journal Of English Language and Education 6(2): 223–236. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v6i2.177 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alenezi, S.M. (2019). Exploring Explicit and Implicit Grammar Teaching. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 8(1): 104–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Al-Jarrah, J. M., Waari, O. T., Talafhah, R. H., & Al-Jarrah, T. M. (2019). Improving English Grammar Achievement through Educational Games among Eleventh Grade Students in East Jerusalem. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v8-i1/5529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Al-khresheh, M.H. & Demirkol Orak, S. (2021). The Place of Grammar Instruction in the 21st Century: Exploring Global Perspectives of English Teachers towards the Role of Teaching Grammar in EFL/ESL Classrooms. World Journal of English Language 11(1): 9. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v11n1p9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Braun V., Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Damaiyanti, S. (2021). Grammatical Errors Made by Students in Speaking English. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JETLE) 2(2): 57–69. https://doi.org/10.18860/jetle.v2i2.11945 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Domes, J.A. (2025). Modified 4-3-2 Technique: Evaluating the Speaking Performance of English as a Foreign Language Learners in Virtual Classrooms. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications 8(1): 566–585. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dominguez Arellano, D. (2025). Grammatical Accuracy on the Students’ Communication Skills and Performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications 8(1): 384–392. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fernández, C. (2023). Explicit and Implicit Learning in Second Language Acquisition. In V. Canese & S. Spezzini (Eds.), Teaching English in Global Contexts, Language, Learners and Learning (pp. 157-165). https://doi.org/10.47133/tegc_ch12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ghalibafan, M. S., & Jabbarpoor, S. (2025). Aligning Pedagogical Beliefs with Teaching Practices in Grammar Intervention. Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, Volume 5(1), pages 46-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Holandyah, M., Erlina, D., Marzulina, L., & Ramadhani, F. R. (2021). Grammar Instruction in Communicative Language Teaching Classrooms: student teachers’ perceptions. Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.19109/ejpp.v8i1.8510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Idris, M.I., Said, N.E.M. & Tan, K.H.. 2020. Game-Based Learning Platform and its Effects Intermediate Grammar Class. International Journal of English Learning and Applied Linguistics (IJELAL) 3(2), 125–134 ISSN: 2775-4359. http://dx.doi.org/10.21111/ijelal.v3i2.9740 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Khanal, B., & Chhetri, D. B. (2024). A pilot study approach to assessing the reliability and validity of relevancy and efficacy survey scale. Janabhawana Research Journal, 3(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.3126/jrj.v3i1.68384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Loewen, S., Isbell, D.R. & Sporn, Z. (2020). The effectiveness of app‐based language instruction for developing receptive linguistic knowledge and oral communicative ability. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12454 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Memon, A., Thurasamy, R., & Cheah, J. (2025). Purposive Sampling: A Review and Guidelines for Quantitative Research. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling (JASEM), 9(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.9(1)01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mohamad, F., Abdul Halim, N.S., Abdul Kadir, Z. & Abdullah, N. (2023). Grammar Learning Strategies Used by ESL Undergraduate Students. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE) 19(3): 462–473. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i3.23325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mohamad, F., Abdul Halim, N.S., Abdul Kadir, Z. & Md Johar, E. (2023). The Relationship Between Grammar Learning Strategies Use and Grammar Competence. European Proceedings of Educational Sciences EpES: 650–658. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.23097.58 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mohamed Salleh, R.T.A., Di Biase, B. & Ramlan, W.N.M. (2020). The Acquisition of English Grammar Among Malay- English Bilingual Primary School Children. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 20(4): 166–185. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2004-10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mohammadi, M.R. & Yousefi, M.H. (2019). Iranian EFL teachers and learners’ perceptions of grammar instruction and corrective feedback. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 4(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-019-0068-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nurhayati, & Sedubun, S. (2024). Investigating the Role of Interactive Activities in Enhancing Pre-Intermediate English Grammar Learning: A Qualitative Inquiry at Universitas Klabat. Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora, 4(2), 869–881. https://doi.org/10.37680/almikraj.v4i02.4962 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Othman, Z.S., Safiai, S., Mamat, S.S. & Mohamad, N.A. (2024). Exploring The Relationship between Teaching Methods and Styles among Educators. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(special issue): 114–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Pare, J. (2024). A Qualitative Case Study: Teacher Perceptions of the Support Received When Working with English Learners [Doctoral dissertation, Bethel University]. Spark Repository. https://spark.bethel.edu/etd/1082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rahman, M. M., Singh, M. K. M., & Pandian, A. (2018). Exploring ESL teacher beliefs and classroom practices of CLT: A case study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 295-310. e-ISSN 1308-1470 https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11121a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Raslee, N. N., Zaidi, A., Hanafi, M., Iksan, H., Awaluddin, F. A., & Kamarudin, S. (2022). Malaysian Second Language Learners’ Linguistic Accuracy in Writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 1351 – 1364. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i10/14972 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Roeder, R., Araujo-Jones, D. & Miller, E.R. (2020). Grammar In Communicative Language Teaching: Teacher Beliefs About Theory Versus Practice. International Journal of English Language Teaching 8(4): 45–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Saeli, H. & Cheng, A. (2019). Student Writers’ Affective Engagement with Grammar-Centred Written Corrective Feedback: The Impact of (Mis)Aligned Practices and Perceptions. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 22(2): 109–132. https://doi.org/10.7202/1065058ar [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sato, M. & Oyanedel, J.C. (2019). “I think that is a better way to teach but …”: EFL teachers’ conflicting beliefs about grammar teaching 84: 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.06.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Schurz, A. & Coumel, M. (2023). Grammar teaching in ELT: A cross-national comparison of teacher-reported practices. Language Teaching Research 25(5): 1167–1192.https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820964137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Shaukat, N. R., Arbab, N. S., & Bashir, N. A. (2025). A Comparative Study of Explicit and Implicit Grammar Instruction: Effects on Learner Uptake. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.59075/ra7rtj16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tadegew, T. (2024). Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of Teaching Grammar Through Focus-on-Form and Context: The Case of EFL Teachers in Ethiopian Preparatory Schools. Science Journal of Education 12(6): 157–165. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20241206.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Tümen-Akyıldız, S., & Ahmed, K.H. (2021). An overview of qualitative research and focus group discussion. Journal of Academic Research in Education, 7(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.17985/ijare.866762 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Yusof, N. M., Narayanan, G., & Arif, M. (2019). A Teacher’s Pedagogical Belief in Teaching Grammar: A Case Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(13),157–165. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i13/6251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study