A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to ICT Engagement, Digital Leadership, and Teaching Performance of ALS Teachers

Authors

Willy P. Calo, MAEd ORCID icon for Willy P. Calo, MAEd

PhD Student, Capitol University (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100643

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 8241-8256

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-08

Accepted: 2025-12-18

Published: 2025-12-29

Abstract

As the Philippine Department of Education advances its digital transformation agenda, understanding how teachers’ engagement with Information and Communication Technology (ICT) translates into instructional effectiveness has become increasingly important, particularly in non-formal education contexts such as the Alternative Learning System (ALS). This study examined the structural relationships among ICT Engagement, Digital Leadership, and Teaching Performance of ALS teachers in Northern Mindanao using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Data were collected from 200 ALS teachers through an online survey utilizing adapted measures of ICT Engagement, perceived Digital Leadership of Education Program Specialists (EPS), and IPCRF-based Teaching Performance ratings. Descriptive results indicated generally low ICT engagement, moderate levels of perceived digital leadership, and high teaching performance ratings. SEM results showed that ICT Engagement significantly predicted both Digital Leadership and Teaching Performance, while Digital Leadership also had a significant effect on Teaching Performance. Mediation analysis revealed that Digital Leadership partially mediated the relationship between ICT Engagement and Teaching Performance. These findings highlight ICT Engagement as the primary driver of instructional performance in ALS, with digital leadership serving a reinforcing role. The study contributes empirical evidence to the limited body of research on digital leadership and ICT integration in non-formal education and underscores the need for sustained ICT capacity-building and strengthened EPS-led digital support to enhance teaching quality in ALS.

Keywords

ICT engagement, Digital Leadership, Teaching Performance

Downloads

References

1. Abimbola, B. L., Aderinto, I. D., & Balogun, O. O. (2025). Influence of teachers’ ICT competency and instructional materials utilization on academic interest of senior secondary school students in Ijebu-Ode, Ogun State. Yobe Journal of Educational Studies, 3(1), 1–15. https://ysu.edu.ng/yojes [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abbu, H., Khan, S., Mugge, P., & Gudergan, G. (2025). Building digital-ready leaders: Development and validation of the human-centric digital leadership scale. Digital, 5(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital5010007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abu-Tineh, A., Alazaizeh, M., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. (2025). School leaders’ digital leadership and teachers’ digital competency in government schools in Qatar: Predicting teachers’ perceptions. Leadership and Policy in Schools. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2025.2531061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Antonopoulou, H., Matzavinou, P., Giannoukou, I., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Teachers’ digital leadership and competencies in primary education: A cross-sectional behavioral study. Education Sciences, 15(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ariate, I. P., & Bacasmot, J. B. (2025). Technology leadership of school heads and teachers’ attitude towards ICT: The mediating effect of technology literacy skills. European Journal of Education Studies, 12(12). https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/6369 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Borja, J. (2022). ALS teachers’ professional attributes and supervisory skills in relation to Alternative Learning System performance. International Journal of Research Publications, 106(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001061820223734 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Büyükbeşe, T., Dıkbaş, T., Klein, M., & Batuk Ünlü, S. (2022). A study on digital leadership scale (DLS) development. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 740–760. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Caratiquit, K. D., & Javier, B. S. (2025). Teachers’ ICT competence, techno-efficacy, school support, and attitude towards digital use in teaching: A mediation and moderation study. Participatory Educational Research, 12(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.31.12.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Education. (2023). DepEd Order No. 016, s. 2023: Guidelines on the implementation of the revised DepEd Computerization Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2023_016.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Education. (2024). Philippines advocates for digital education reforms at ASEAN Ministers Meeting. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2024/08/26/philippines-advocates-for-digital-education-reforms-at-asean-ministers-meeting/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Department of Education. (2025). DM 017, s. 2025: Interim Guidelines for the Department of Education Performance Management and Evaluation System for Teachers in the School Year 2024–2025. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2025/02/11/february-7-2025-dm-017-s-2025-interim-guidelines-for-the-department-of-education-performance-management-and-evaluation-system-for-teachers-in-the-school-year-2024-2025/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Eberl, J. K., & Drews, P. (2021). Digital leadership — Mountain or molehill? A literature review. In F. Ahlemann, R. Schütte, & S. Stieglitz (Eds.), Innovation Through Information Systems (pp. 223–237). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86800-0_17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Erhan, T., Uzunbacak, H. H., & Aydın, E. (2022). From conventional to digital leadership: Exploring digitalization of leadership and innovative work behavior. Management Research Review, 45(11), 1524–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2021-0338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Joshi, B. M., & Khatiwada, S. P. (2024). Analyzing barriers to ICT integration in education: A systematic review. Tribhuvan University Journal, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3126/ttp.v24i1.73325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kunina-Habenicht, O., & Goldhammer, F. (2020). ICT Engagement: a new construct and its assessment in PISA 2015. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00084-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lukman, F., & Yune, E. K. (2025). Digital leadership and teacher digital competence as keys to successful integration of digital culture in education. Development: Studies in Educational Management and Leadership, 4(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.47766/development.v4i1.3381 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mahinay, R.B.D., & Manla, E. C. (2025). Qualitative Insights on the Implementation of the Alternative Learning System in the Philippines. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 6(1), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2025.6.1.896 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nikolopoulou, K., & Gialamas, V. (2016). Exploring secondary school pupils’ ICT engagement: A validation study. Creative Education, 7, 567–573. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.74059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ozan, Ö., & Özarslan, Y. (2025). Investigating factors influencing faculty members’ digital competence for capacity building on open and distance education in HEIs. Open Praxis, 17(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.2.775 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Pakino, J. D., & Ubayubay, R. (2024). Job motivation and satisfaction towards teaching performance among Alternative Learning System (ALS) teachers. International Journal of Research Publications, 144(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001441320246136 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Paudel, P. (2020). Teachers’ skill and motivation in using information and communication technology. Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation, 2(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.3126/pjri.v2i0.33431 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Prieto, J., Guede-Cid, R., Cid-Cid, A. I., & Leguey, S. (2023). Major increases in teachers’ performance evaluations: Evidence from student evaluation of teaching surveys. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 11(2), 149–180. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2299 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Radiamoda, A.-F. A. R., Ngo, C. G., Budadong, D., & Obiena, C. M. (2024). ICT engagement and digital competence of preservice English teachers. International Journal Corner of Educational Research, 3(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.54012/ijcer.v3i1.265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Saeed, S., & Kang, M. A. (2024). The impact of digital leadership on the performance of secondary teachers. Academy of Education & Social Sciences Review, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i1.696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Salen, D. B., & Porcincula, E. J. (2025). Instructional competencies of Alternative Learning System (ALS) teachers: Basis for career advancement program. International Journal of Research Publications, 170(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001701420257778 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sartain, L. (2024). Are teachers satisfied with their evaluations? The role of perceived fairness and accuracy. AERA Open, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231221539 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Singh, S., & Singh, S. (2023). Usage of ICT in relation to self-efficacy among secondary school teachers. International Journal of Advanced Academic Studies, 5(2), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.33545/27068919.2023.v5.i2a.926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Exploring the relationship between educational ICT resources, student engagement, and academic performance: A multilevel structural equation analysis based on PISA 2018 data. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 79, 101308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles