Influence of Laboratory Anxiety on Skill Acquisition and Confidence in Handling Electrical Equipment among Electrical Engineering Students

This paper has discussed the role of laboratory anxiety in the learning of skills and confidence in operating electrical equipment among Electrical Engineering students. Due to the risky environment of electrical laboratories, it was discovered in the research that the fear of equipment, the fear of safety, the fear of error, and the pressure on the performance of students influence their technical performance and emotional preparedness. The study was carried out on a sample of 162 students who were taking major Electrical Engineering laboratory courses, using quantitative descriptive-correlational design. The structured survey was used as a source of data collection in measuring laboratory anxiety, perceived skill acquisition, and confidence levels. The relationships and predictive factors were also established using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analyses. Findings showed that the students have a high rate of laboratory anxiety especially on issues of safety and fear of working with electrical equipment. The acquisition of skills was observed to be of moderate level with troubleshooting being the lowest. The levels of confidence were moderate too, and the lowest scores were considered to be on working on live circuits. Notable negative correlation was identified that there is a strong association between the high anxiety and the low skill acquisition (r = -0.63) and low confidence (r = -0.71). The regression analysis revealed that the fear of electrical equipment is the most powerful predictor to both outcomes. The results focus on the necessity of improvement in safety training, scaffold work, and facilitating laboratory conditions.

laboratory anxiety, skill acquisition, confidence, electrical engineering students

1. Agustian, H. Y., Kim, S. J., & Bae, T. Y. (2025). Sensory overload and performance barriers in undergraduate chemistry laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 102(3), 455–468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almutairi, S. M. (2024). Teaching experience and its influence on teacher self-efficacy in higher education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 18(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2024.18.2.04 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baloran, E. T. (2020). Knowledge, attitudes, anxiety, and coping strategies of students during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 25(8), 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1769300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bowen, C. W. (2019). Laboratory anxiety among undergraduate science students: A review. Science Education Review, 18(1), 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cabañero, L., & Tuliao, R. (2021). Teacher self-efficacy and instructional quality in Philippine higher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2), 159–174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cabaron, R. R. (2023). Influence of self-efficacy on teaching digital technology as perceived by maritime education faculty in the Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(8), 2811–2821. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Canrinus, E. T., Helms-Lorenz, M., Beijaard, D., Buitink, J., & Hofman, A. (2017). Teachers’ self-efficacy, job satisfaction, motivation, and commitment: Exploring relationships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(7), 546–559. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ekong, P. U. (2021). Emotional distress and performance in engineering laboratories: Understanding anxiety and engagement. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 11(4), 56–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ferrell, B., & Barbera, J. (2021). Confidence and performance in undergraduate chemistry labs: The role of affective states. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(2), 320–330. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Galloway, J. (2020). Student perceptions of risk and anxiety in electrical engineering laboratories. Engineering Education Review, 5(1), 22–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jones, M., Carter, R., & Wilhelm, L. (2025). Affective stressors and safety perception in undergraduate laboratory environments. Journal of STEM Education Research, 8(1), 88–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kim, Y., & Bae, K. (2024). Emotional stress and laboratory performance among engineering undergraduates: A mixed-methods investigation. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(4), 721–739. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. OSHA. (2020). Laboratory safety guidelines for electrical environments. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pasana, J. P., Badua, J. I. R., Manaois, A. R., Retuya, J. R. T., Bernardo, J. V., & Camara, J. S. (2022). Self-efficacy among engineering and fisheries technology students in Region I, Philippines. ASEAN Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 10(2), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Pontigon, A., & Talanquer, V. (2025). Anxiety, mistake-making, and student participation in undergraduate chemistry labs. International Journal of Science Education, 47(1), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Santos, R. J., & Mercado, L. P. (2024). Academic rank and instructional self-efficacy among university faculty: Implications for professional development. Asia Pacific Journal of Higher Education, 12(1), 112–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Zhang, Y., & Lee, J. (2025). Dialogic feedback and learner-centered strategies in flexible learning: Enhancing engagement and motivation in higher education. Computers and Education, 211, 105658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105658 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zheng, L., & Deng, H. (2025). Anxiety and satisfaction with laboratory learning environments among Japanese graduate students. Asian Journal of STEM Education, 6(2), 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zhou, X., Shu, L., Xu, Z., & Padrón, Y. (2023). The effect of professional development on in-service STEM teachers’ self-efficacy: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(37). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00422-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• An Adaptive Joint Filtering Approach to Wireless Relay Network for Transmission Rate Maximization
• IoT-Integrated Mercury Substance Detection System for Cosmetic Product Safety
• Design and Implementation of Solar PV-Based Railway Microgrid for Linke Hofmann Busch Coaches
• Cost Control Techniques on Civil Engineering Projects in Oyo State, Nigeria
• Strength and Predictive Modeling of Corn Cob Ash Blended Concrete Using Multi-Output Artificial Neural Network Approach