The Validity and Reliability Constructs of the 4T1R Model and Islamic Education Management Practices of People's Religious School Management, Southern Thailand

In the modern era of education, the People's Religious Schools in the southern provinces of Thailand function as important Islamic educational institutions, providing students with religious and academic knowledge in line with the Ministry of Education curriculum. These institutions not only impart knowledge, but also play a role in shaping individuals who are moral and competitive. To achieve this goal, school leadership and management must implement effective management practices, based on the 4T1R model, which includes planning, organizing, guiding, supervising and surrendering. The structured supervision mechanism is still not stable, resulting in unbalanced and resilient curriculum implementation. These factors affect the learning process which should focus on strengthening students' morals and life skills. In addition, the concepts and principles of teaching and learning in the 21st century require teachers to have qualifications beyond just teaching. They also need to have the ability to guide students in navigating the world of learning and learning from real experiences. This study was conducted to develop and validate an instrument based on the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) process for measuring the 4T1R Model (based on Planning, Organize, Guiding, Surrender, Supervise) and Islamic Education Management Practices people’s Religious School Management, Southern Thailand. This study uses quantitative research methods based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze various relationships between variables in the study model. Before the data is analyzed using SEM, EFA is carried out to identify the appropriateness of the items used in the research instrument. This study describes in detail the procedure of conducting EFA analysis for each construct. The findings of this study show validity values based on Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO), Total Variance Explained (TVE), Factor Loading (FL) and reliability values based on Cronbach's Alpha (CA), have met all the required values.

Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Validity, Total Variance Explained

1. Adnan Aleekahae (2010). “Panha Laek Khuam Tongkan Khong Khru Islamseksa Naikan Chatkanriankanson Islamseksa nai Rongrian Khong Rat Tam Khrokan Pattana Kanriankanson Islamseksa Radab Phraktomaseksa nai Changwad Pattani”. Tesis Sarjana. PSU. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aminah Mamu (2000). “Khuam Samphan Rakwang Kannitaes Kanson Wicha Islamseksa Khong Pu Borihan Kap Pheriktikam kanson khong Khru Son Islamseksa Nai Rongrian Praktomaseksa Changwad Nawathiwat”. Tesis sarjana pendidikan. PSU [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Awang, Z. (2012). Structural equation modelling using AMOS graphic. Penerbit Universiti Teknologi MARA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chik, Z., & Abdullah, A. H. (2018). Developing and validating instruments for measurement of motivation, learning styles and learning disciplines for academic achievement. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8 (4), 594 - 605. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chik, Z., Abdullah, A. H., Ismail, M. S. & Mohd Noor, A. Z. (2024). Impact of Industrial Revolution 4.0 (IR4.0) Knowledge, Application Learning, University Policy, Commitment to Study and Motivation on Assimilate IR4.0 in Education. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 7 (4), 3884 – 3889. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Duntemen, G. H. (1989). Principles components analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. California: Sage Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Field, A. (2006). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hoque, A. S. M. M., Awang, Z., Jusoff, K., Salleh, F., and Muda, H (2017). Social Business Efficiency: Instrument Development and Validation Procedure using Structural Equation Modelling. International Business Management, 11(1), 222-231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lewis-Beck M. S. (1994). Factor analysis and related techniques. London: Sage Publication, Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Muhamatsakree Manyunu, (2008). “Analisis Perubahan Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam di Sekolah Agama Rakyat di Thailand selatan sejak Kurikulum (1961- 2003)” Desertasi Phd. Universiti Pendidikan Idris, Tanjung Malim. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Pitchaya Todting (2016). “Sapap Panha Laek Laeuthan kanborihan laksut islamseksa baebkhem nai rongrian khon Rat changwad Songkhla” Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan, PSU [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Thongchai Somboon (2006). Pentadbiran dan pengurusan manusia dalam organisasi. Bangkok: Ahli Falsafah Siam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study