Using Buzz Technique in Mib Learning

The contemporary national education system emphasizes student-centered learning; however, some students remain passive in classroom discussions and struggle to express their ideas. Although various interactive teaching strategies have been promoted, existing studies on the buzz group method have largely focused on subjects other than Melayu Islam Beraja (MIB), with limited empirical evidence available within the Bruneian educational context. Therefore, this study investigates the effectiveness of the buzz group method in enhancing student participation and MIB learning. Guided by Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, this study employed a mixed methods approach using a reflective action research design. The participants involved of 21 Year 9 students from a government secondary, with four students purposively selected for interviews. Quantitative data were collected through pre-tests and post-tests and analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test, while qualitative data from semi-structured interviews were analyzed thematically. The findings indicate a statistically significant improvement in student achievement following the implementation of the buzz group method (p < 0.05). Qualitative findings further reveal positive student perceptions in terms of confidence, understanding, participation, and collaborative learning. Overall, the study reveals that the buzz group method is an effective pedagogical strategy for promoting active engagement and improving learning outcomes in MIB classrooms. It is recommended that MIB teachers incorporate structured small-group discussion strategies to support student-centered learning in alignment with 21st-century educational goals.

buzz group method, learning, Melayu Islam Beraja (MIB)

1. Attride-Striling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brewer, W., E. (1997). 13 Proven Ways to Get Your Messages Across. Corwin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dayang Hajah Salamah bin Haji Kalong. (2013). Keberkesanan Kaedah Yang Digunakakan Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Sejarah Islam di Peringkat Menengah Atas di Negara Brunei Darussalam [Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan Islam]. Universiti Brunei Darussalam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gamal Abdul Nasir Zakaria. (2014). Tokoh-Tokoh Abadi Pendidikan Islam. Negara Brunei Darussalam. Kolej Universiti Perguruan Ugama Seri Begawan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ikromah, J. N., Asmaningrum, N., & Sulistiyorini, L. (2015). Perbedaan Metode Buzz Group Discussion dengan CeramahAudiovisual terhadap Tingkat Pendidikan Warga Binaan tentangHIV/AIDS di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Klas IIA KabupatenJember. E-Jurnal Pustaka Kesehatan, 3(1), 82–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3-4), 85–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kementerian Pendidikan. (2010). Pendidikan Kenegaraan Melayu Islam Beraja. Jabatan Perkembangan Kurikulum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1986). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Komarudin, Aji Ismanto, Heni Rodiawati, Nora Septina, Nia Agustiana, & Novi Rosmawati. (2019). Buzz Group Application Methods to Improve The Students’ Reasoning Ability and Mathematical Communication Skills of Class VIII Budi Mulya High School Bandar Lampung. Journal of Physics, 1–6. 10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (3rd Edition). Sage Publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Malawi Institute of Education. (2004). Participatory Teaching and Learning Theory: A Guide to Methods and Techniques. Malawi Institute of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ni’mah, W. (2015). The use of buzz group technique to enhance students’ activeness and writing skill of hortatory exposition text (a classroom action research with the eleventh grade students of MA Al Khoiriyyah Semarang in the academic year of 2014/2015) [Undergrade Thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rose Dee Yusof. (2009). Aplikasi pembelajaran Aktif untuk mata pelajaran Syariah begi peringkat Pra Universiti di Negara Brunei Darussalam [Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan Islam]. Universiti Brunei Darussalam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Shahrulanuar, H. M. (2013). Kaedah Perbincangan Sesi Buzz di dalam Permasalahan Zakat: Kajian Kuasi-Eksperimen bagi Pelajar Tahun 9 di Salah Sebuah Sekolah Menengah Swasta [Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan Islam]. Universiti Brunei Darussalam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Trianto. (2011). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif:Konsep Landasan,Implementasi Pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Kencana Prenada Media [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study