Communicate to Captivate: Integrating Discourse Competence Elements in ESL Academic Presentations

This ethnographic single-case study examines the manifestations of discourse competence among 15 ESL learners during oral essay map presentations in a blended English for Academic Purposes (EAP) program at a Malaysian public university. This case study aims to illuminate how aspects of discourse competence are demonstrated and integrated within a specific blended learning environment within a defined setting and a limited group of participants. Applying template analysis on observational and semi-structured interview data from fifteen participants, and grounded in Januin and Stephen's (2015) framework, the study delineates five fundamental components: public speaking proficiency (including paralinguistic strategies and question-handling effectiveness), adaptation of written organizational structures to oral formats, interactive and interactional metadiscourse (comprising transitions, frame markers, boosters, and stance markers), metalinguistic awareness (through public speaking and essay-specific terminology), and technological integration (employing audio-visual aids such as Canva and Prezi).
The analysis clarifies how students strategically organise these components to create textual coherence, cohesion, and audience engagement, thereby enhancing existing models by integrating multimodal digital literacies as essential aspects of discourse competence. Examples of this type of language include interactive metadiscourse, which helps things move forward (such as "however" and "first"), and interactional markers that convey someone's feelings about something (like "You will look good too"). Audio-visual aids served as navigational "road signs," reducing confusion and demonstrating the rhetorical effectiveness of technology.
These empirical findings align with fundamental paradigms of communicative competence (Hymes, 1972; Celce-Murcia et al., 1995), highlighting the advancement of discourse competence in technology-mediated educational environments. The results support the need for a clear EAP curriculum that systematically incorporates these skills to enhance persuasive academic communication, particularly for non-native speakers learning to utilise various types of media. Additionally, the pedagogical frameworks utilised in blended learning contexts introduce further complexities, necessitating a re-evaluation of traditional methods to improve academic discourse competence among these varied student populations (Januin & McLellan, 2016; Januin et al., 2023).

Discourse competence, Metadiscourse, Technology integration, Academic Presentation, Metalanguage

1. Alghamdi, N. A. (2020). Beyond Language Classes: Semiotic Practices in PowerPoint Slideshows in Pharmaceutical English-Mediated Presentations. Arab World English Journal, 6, 140. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alkhawaja, H. W., Paramasivam, S., Nimehchisalem, V., & Kasim, Z. M. (2022). Discourse Markers (DMs) in Classroom Oral Presentation of Arab Postgraduate Students. International Journal of Linguistics, 14(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v14i1.19391 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alqahtani, N, et al. (2029). Short Guides in Education Research Methodologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/items/38851187-9cb5-4d7d-91a9-bde5be29d7c6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barrett, N., & Liu, G. (2016). Global Trends and Research Aims for English Academic Oral Presentations. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1227. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barzelay, M. (2019). Public management as a design-oriented professional discipline. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Baškarada, S. (2014). Qualitative Case Study Guidelines. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Blazer, S., & DeCapua, S. E. (2020). Disciplinary Corpus Research for Situated Literacy Instruction. In The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks (p. 317). https://doi.org/10.37514/atd-b.2020.0407.2.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Canals, L. (2023). Translanguaging practices and metalinguistic reflection during negotiation of meaning in tandem virtual exchanges. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.1135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chen, L., & Hu, G. (2020). Mediating Knowledge through Expressing Surprises: A Frame-based Analysis of Surprise Markers in Research Articles across Disciplines and Research Paradigms. Discourse Processes, 57(8), 659. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2020.1737348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dressen‐Hammouda, D. (2002). Accounting for fieldwork in three areas of geology: A situated analysis of textual silence and salience. HAL (Le Centre Pour La Communication Scientifique Directe). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Drisko, J. W. (2024). Transferability and Generalization in Qualitative Research. Research on Social Work Practice, 35(1), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315241256560 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ducasse, A. M., & Brown, A. (2023). Rhetorical relations in university students’ presentations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 63, 101251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fauzanna, W., Chow, U. T., & Hashim, A. (2024). RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATIONS AT THE ASEAN FEDERATION OF ACCOUNTANTS (AFA) CONFERENCE. Issues in Language Studies, 13(1), 339. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.5726.2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Fortanet-Gómez, I., & Querol-Julián, M. (2019). Collaborative teaching and learning of interactive multimodal spoken academic genres for doctoral students. International Journal of English Studies, 19(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.348911 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fusch, P. I., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R.. How to conduct a mini-ethnographic case study: A guide for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 22, 923-941. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Huang, H., & Chang, Y. (2015). Applying Genre-based and L2 Pragmatic Instruction to Teaching Oral Presentations on the Web. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 66. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2015100105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Islamiyah, M., & Fajri, M. S. A. (2020). Investigating Indonesian Master’s Students’ Perception of Critical Thinking in Academic Writing in a British University. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jamaludin, K. A., Alias, N., DeWitt, D., & Ibrahim, M. M. (2020). Technical communication pedagogical model (TCPM) for Malaysian vocational colleges. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00597-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Januin, J. (2007). Exploring readiness for language learning autonomy among distance learners in Sabah, Malaysia. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 16-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Januin, J., & McLellan, J. (2016). Teachers’ Perceptions of Developing Student Discourse Competence in a Blended Learning EAP Class Environment. In Z. Hasim & R. Barnard (Eds.), Pedagogical Research Practices in Higher Learning Institutions in Malaysia (pp. 96-110).Universiti Malaya Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Januin, J., & Stephen, J. (2015). Exploring Discourse Competence Elements in EAP Class Presentations through Document and Ethnographic Analyses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.192 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Januin, J., Atin, V. P., Osman, W. H., Ibrahim, M. A., Yakin, H. S. M., Hafidz, M. A., ... & Abd Rahman, N. D. (2023). Empowering Adult Inmates with Communication Needs in an East Malaysia Prison. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(3), e002173-e002173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Jones-Hooker, C., & Tyndall, D. E. (2023). Application of case study research and ethnography methods: Lessons learned. Applied Nursing Research, 73, 151713. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kasim, A. A. M., Darus, N. A., Lee, N. A. A., Subramaniam, A. L. B., & Januin, J. (2022). Online collaborative performance in group-based tasks among learners of higher education. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(3), 948–966. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kaur, K., & Ali, A. M. (2017). Exploring the Genre of Academic Oral Presentations: A Critical Review [Review of Exploring the Genre of Academic Oral Presentations: A Critical Review]. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 7(1), 152. Australian International Academic Centre PTY. LTD. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.1p.152 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Khammee, K., Liang-Itsara, A., Nomnian, S., & RHEE, S. (2024). The Effects of Using Scientific Genre to Promote Undergraduate Students’ English Academic Writing in an ESP Course. World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 170. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n3p170 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Khoo, E., & Huo, X. (2022). The Efficacy of Culturally Responsive Pedagogy for Low-Proficiency International Students in Online Teaching and Learning. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v16i2.7022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kostareva, E. V., & Utkina, T. (2022). Metadiscourse use in argumentative essays written by Russian students at different levels of ESAP study of economics. Brno Studies in English, 1, 71. https://doi.org/10.5817/bse2022-1-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Lee, J. C. P. (2023). Gaze and Facial Expression in Engineering Student Presentations: A Comparative Case Study of a High- and Low-Performing Presenter. ESP Today, 11(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2023.11.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Liao, M., & Liao, Y. (2022). Improving Chinese College Students’ Argumentative Writing: A Presentation-Assimilation-Discussion-Exercise Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874531 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Łubiarz, M., & Kościńska, A. (2024). Webquest for Academic Purposes — a Strategy for Developing Students’ EAP Skills. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.1096 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Medina, A. E. (2022). Switching the paradigm in academic literacy: from a normative to a transformative insight in academic writing. Educación, 31(60), 155. https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202201.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Melnyk, А. (2019). Using multimedia presentation in the foreign language classroom to form tertiary students’ oral presentation competence. The Scientific and Methodological Journal Foreign Languages, 100(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.32589/1817-8510.2019.4.186220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Moestrup, S. (2019). Performing the persona: A case study of persona-driven cultural journalism and cultural criticism. Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Mohamad, N. A., Aziz, A. A. A., Razali, N. A., Juned, A. M., & Abdullah, N. (2024). METADISCOURSE IN THE DIGITAL ACADEMIC POSTER: EXAMINING THE TEXTUAL AND VISUAL METADISCOURSE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PERSUASION. Issues in Language Studies, 13(1), 284. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.5739.2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Morell, T. (2014). International conference paper presentations: A multimodal analysis to determine effectiveness. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in Student Academic Writing. Written Communication, 29(2), 142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312438529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Njie, B., & Asimiran, S. (2014). Case Study as a Choice in Qualitative Methodology. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 4(3), 35. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-04313540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Nurhayati, D. A. W. (2023). Students’ Reaction on Operating Rhetorical Strategies in Promoting Linguistic Skills and Cultural Diversity at Islamic Multicultural Classrooms. DINAMIKA ILMU, 23(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v23i1.6036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Osman, W. H., & Januin, J. (2021). Analysing ESL Persuasive Essay Writing Using Toulmin’s Model of Argument. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(1), 1810. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i1.1034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Rachman, D., Khatimah, K., Kusuma, I. P. I., & Roni, M. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of Oral Presentations with Mobile Technology in Tertiary Education. Script Journal Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 9(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v9i1.1578 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Rachman, D., Margana, M., Priyanto, P., & Mahayanti, N. W. S. (2023). Designing Model for Oral Presentation Instruction in Indonesian Tertiary Context. World Journal of English Language, 13(5), 559. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n5p559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Restall, G., Yao, Y., & Niu, X. (2023). Exploring the experience of Year 10 South Korean students’ English language learning in immersive virtual reality. TESOL in Context, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2023vol31no2art1731 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Robillos, R. J. (2023). Effect of Metacognitive-Based Digital Graphic Organizer on Learners’ Oral Presentation Skill and Self-Regulation of Learning Awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 639. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16334a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Smirnova, N. (2015). Successful ESL Writing for Publication: The Role of Writers’ Autonomy Linguistic Competence and L1/L2 Critical Reading Skills. Journal of Language and Education, 1(4), 54. https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2015-1-4-54-62 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Thorne, S. L., & Hellermann, J. (2022). Coda: the interactional affordances and constraints of technology-rich teaching and learning environments. Classroom Discourse, 13(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2022.2071959 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Uztosun, M. S. (2024). Cultivating Oral Communication Skills in Academic Contexts (p. 143). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72545-6_7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Wei, Y., Sulaiman, N. A., & Ismail, H. H. (2024). Academic English Writing Challenges in a Blended EFL and ESL Learning Environment: Insights from Chinese International High School Students. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 23(2), 275. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Weisi, H., & Zandi, M. (2024). A mixed-method concurrent transformative study of metadiscourse markers employed by L2 speakers: does proficiency level matter? Language Testing in Asia, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00330-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Wette, R., & Furneaux, C. (2018). The academic discourse socialisation challenges and coping strategies of international graduate students entering English-medium universities. System, 78, 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Wu, Y., Li, S., Zhang, S., Wang, X., & Li, Q. (2024, November). Trinity: Synchronizing Verbal, Nonverbal, and Visual Channels to Support Academic Oral Presentation Delivery. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Symposium of Chinese CHI (pp. 63–92). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2411.17015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Yu-min, W., & Xie, Q. (2022). Diagnostic assessment of novice EFL learners’ discourse competence in academic writing: a case study. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00197-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Zahari, N. S., Supie, H. S. M., Khairuddin, Z., & Khairuddin, Z. (2023). Assessment Practices for Oral Presentations: Insights from ESL Instructors. International Journal of Education, 15(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v15i1.20684 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study