Thematic Spelling Tests: Exploring EFL Teachers’ Opinions on Students’ Vocabulary Acquisition among Primary EFL Students

Recognising that vocabulary acquisition is essential for effective language learning. This qualitative study investigates EFL teachers’ opinions of using thematic spelling tests to support vocabulary acquisition among primary students in a Malaysian expatriate school. Guided by narrative inquiry, semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight EFL teachers who had experience implementing thematic spelling lists in their classrooms. The data were analysed thematically to identify teachers’ views on vocabulary development, learners’ self-efficacy, and instructional challenges. Findings reveal five key themes. Teachers reported that repeated exposure through weekly spelling tests reinforces vocabulary retention, strengthens phoneme–grapheme mapping, and improves word recognition and accuracy. Thematic spelling tests were also perceived to enhance students’ self-efficacy, as mastery experiences, relatable themes, and visible progress increased learners’ confidence and motivation. Additionally, the use of thematic lists was found to promote contextual learning by enabling students to connect new vocabulary with textbook content and real-life situations. Despite these benefits, teachers identified notable challenges, including mixed-ability classrooms which are varying levels of learner readiness and insufficient instructional time due to curriculum demands and extracurricular commitments. These constraints often limited opportunities for in-class drilling and required greater reliance on home practice. Overall, the study concludes that thematic spelling tests are a valuable tool for vocabulary development, contextual learning, and self-efficacy building in primary EFL classrooms, but their effectiveness depends on adequate time allocation, differentiated strategies, and stronger instructional support.

EFL learners, teacher’s perceptions, thematic spelling tests

1. Albuquerque, A., & Martins, M. A. (2021). Invented spelling activities in kindergarten: The role of instructional scaffolding and collaborative learning. International Journal of Early Years Education, 29(1), 96-113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bandura, A. (1984). Representing personal determinants in causal structures. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bandura, A. (2021). Analysis of modeling processes. In Psychological modeling (pp. 1-62). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Basaran, S., & Cabaroglu, N. (2014). Language Learning Podcasts and Learners' Belief Change. TESL-EJ, 17(4), n4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Belda-Medina, J., & Marrahi-Gomez, V. (2023). The impact of augmented reality (AR) on vocabulary acquisition and student motivation. Electronics, 12(3), 749. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bhattarai, J., Gnawali, L., Laudari, S., & Shrestha, S. (2021). Lack of participation in classroom interaction. Exploratory Action Research Stories of Nepalese EFL Teachers, 26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Clandinin, D. J. (2022). Engaging in narrative inquiry. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Comstock, M., Litke, E., Hill, K. L., & Desimone, L. M. (2023). A culturally responsive disposition: How professional learning and teachers’ beliefs about and self-efficacy for culturally responsive teaching relate to instruction. AERA Open, 9, 23328584221140092. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Comstock, M., Litke, E., Hill, K. L., & Desimone, L. M. (2023). A culturally responsive disposition: How professional learning and teachers’ beliefs about and self-efficacy for culturally responsive teaching relate to instruction. AERA Open, 9, 23328584221140092. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cong, Y., Yang, L., & Ergün, A. L. P. (2024). Exploring the relationship between burnout, learning engagement and academic self-efficacy among EFL learners: A structural equation modeling analysis. Acta Psychologica, 248, 104394. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Coxhead, A. (2012). Academic vocabulary, writing and english for Academic purposes: Perspectives from second language learners. RELC Journal, 43(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212439323 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Coxhead, A. (2021). Vocabulary in English for academic purposes. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 79–94). Routledge [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dalila, A. A., Rahmah, S., Liliawati, W., & Kaniawati, I. (2022). The effect of differentiated learning in problem-based learning on cognitive learning outcomes of high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 1820-1826. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Directionality and organizational processes in paired‑associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(3), 305–312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Elgort, I. (2020). Vocabulary learning and assessment: A commentary on four studies for JALT Vocabulary SIG. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 9(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.7820/vli.v09.2.elgort [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fan, N. (2020). Strategy use in second language vocabulary learning and its relationships with the breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00752https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022823522040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Huang, M. (2025). Spaced repetition and retrieval practice: Efficient learning mechanisms from a cognitive psychology perspective and their empowerment by AI. International Journal of Asian Social Science Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hung, H. T. (2015). Intentional vocabulary learning using digital flashcards. English Language Teaching, 8(10), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n10p107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Imtiaz, M., Hassan, K. H. U., & Akmal, F. (2023). Analyzing spelling errors committed by English as a second language (ESL) learners at secondary school level. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 181-189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Jasim, Y. B., Rahman, A., & Ma, Y. (2020). Vocabulary size and vocabulary learning strategy usage among Chinese undergraduates at Universiti Putra Malaysia. Journal of Modern Languages, 29, 99–125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kazu, I. Y., & Kuvvetli, M. (2023). The Influence of Pronunciation Education via Artificial Intelligence Technology on Vocabulary Acquisition in Learning English. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 10(2), 480-493. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Laufer, B. (2024). Understanding L2-derived words in context: Is complete receptive morphological knowledge necessary?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(1), 200-213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Laufer, B. (2024). Understanding L2-derived words in context: Is complete receptive morphological knowledge necessary?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(1), 200-213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Levesque, K. C., Breadmore, H. L., & Deacon, S. H. (2021). How morphology impacts reading and spelling: Advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 10-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Martin, K. I. (2024). How a phonics-based intervention, L1 orthography, and item characteristics impact adult ESL spelling knowledge. Education Sciences, 14(4), 421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Moore, S., & Cuevas, J. A. (2022). The Effects of Cognitively Guided Phonetic Instruction on Achievement and Self Efficacy in Elementary Students in a Response to Intervention Program. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(4), 35-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Moscati, V., Marini, A., & Biondo, N. (2023). What a thousand children tell us about grammatical complexity and working memory: A cross-sectional analysis on the comprehension of clitics and passives in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 44(6), 1161–1184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716423000462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1962). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ningrum, A. W., & Murti, R. C. (2023). Contextual learning models in improving elementary school critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 48-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ntibanyurwa, S. (2025). Investigating the role of English language proficiency on learner’s academic performance. African Quarterly Social Science Review, 2(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.51867/AQSSR.2.2.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ortikova, A. R., Madaminova, G. J., & Yuldosheva, T. S. (2022). THE IMPORTANCE OF SPELLING. Достижения науки и образования, (1 (81)), 20-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ozer, E. M. (2022). Albert Bandura (1925–2021). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Pan, S. C., Rickard, T. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2021). Does spelling still matter—and if so, how should it be taught? Perspectives from contemporary and historical research. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1523-1552. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ratnasari, A. (2020). EFL students’ challenges in learning speaking skills: A case study in mechanical engineering department. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 20-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Raza, K. (2020). Differentiated instruction in English language teaching: Insights into the implementation of Raza’s teaching adaptation model in Canadian ESL classrooms. TESL Ontario Contact Magazine, 46(2), 41-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Schlinger, H. D. (2021). The impact of B. F. Skinner’s science of operant learning on early childhood research, theory, treatment, and care. Early Child Development and Care, 191(7–8), 1089–1106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Schmitt, N. (1997). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199–227). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language learning, 48(2), 281-317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge university press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Schmitt, N., Nation, P., & Kremmel, B. (2020). Moving the field of vocabulary assessment forward: The need for more rigorous test development and validation. Language Teaching, 53(1), 109–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Self-efficacy and human motivation. In Advances in motivation science (Vol. 8, pp. 153-179). Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2023). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Segal, M. A., & Mandler, G. (1967). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Sinyashina, E. (2020). ‘Incidental+ Intentional’vs ‘Intentional+ Incidental’Vocabulary Learning: Which is More Effective? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Skinner, C. H., McLaughlin, T. E., & Logan, P. L. (1997). Cover, Copy, and Compare: A Self-managed Academic Intervention Effective Across Skills, Students, and Settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 295-306. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. students. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(1), 164-185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Sumardi, L., Rohman, A., & Wahyudiati, D. (2020). Does the Teaching and Learning Process in Primary Schools Correspond to the Characteristics of the 21st Century Learning?. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 357-370. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Surmanov, S., & Azimova, M. (2020). Analysis of difficulties in vocabulary acquisition. The Journal of Legal Studies, 6(1), 144-153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Sutrisna, G. (2021). Vocabulary acquisition in EFL: A literature review of innovative vocabulary teaching strategies. Yavana Bhasha: Journal of English Language Education, 4(1), 8-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Theoretical issues in free recall. In T. R. Dixon & D. L. Horton (Eds.), Verbal behaviour and general behaviour theory (pp. 2–36). Prentice‑Hall Tulving, E. (1968). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Usher, E. L., & Weidner, B. L. (2022). Sociocultural influences on self-efficacy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 68, 102039. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. using quizlet. Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(1), 289-299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Waddington, J. (2023). Self-efficacy. ELT journal, 77(2), 237-240. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Waluyo, B., & Bakoko, R. (2021a). Vocabulary list learning supported by gamification: Classroom action research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Waluyo, B., & Bucol, J. L. (2021). The impact of gamified vocabulary learning using Quizlet on low-proficiency [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Wedin, Å. (2024). Teachers’ Perceptions of Basic Literacy Teaching: The Case of Basic Literacy in Education for Adult L2 Learners in Sweden. Nordic Journal of Literacy Research, 10(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Wei, L. (2021). Teaching academic vocabulary to English language learners (ELLs). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(12), 1507–1514. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1112.01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Wiradika, I. N. I., & Retnawati, H. (2021). Contextual learning in elementary school: a meta analysis. Progres Pendidikan, 2(3), 174-182. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Yaccob NS, Yunus MM and Hashim H (2022) The Integration of Global Competence Into Malaysian English as a Second Language Lessons for Quality Education (Fourth United Nations Sustainable Development Goal). Front. Psychol. 13:848417. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848417 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Yuwandra, R., & Arnawa, I. M. (2020, May). Development of learning tools based on contextual teaching and learning in fifth grade of primary schools. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1554, No. 1, p. 012077). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Zaidi, A., Caines, A., Moore, R., Buttery, P., & Rice, A. (2020). Adaptive forgetting curves for spaced repetition language learning. arXiv preprint. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study