Students' Perspectives on AI Tools for Academic Oral Communication Preparation: A Study in a Malaysian EAP Context

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in educational contexts has gained considerable attention, yet research on their application in academic oral communication remains limited. This study explores first-year undergraduate students' experiences using AI tools—specifically ChatGPT and Magic School AI—to prepare for group discussions in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) classroom at a Malaysian university. Using a quantitative survey approach, data were collected from 77 students across various academic disciplines, all at B2 CEFR proficiency level. The findings reveal overwhelmingly positive perceptions of AI usefulness (90.9% for Magic School AI; 84.4% for ChatGPT) and relevance (80.5% and 88.3% respectively). However, qualitative responses identified five critical challenges: over-reliance risks, accuracy concerns, ethical considerations, content depth limitations, and technical usability issues. This study contributes to the emerging discourse on AI integration in language learning by documenting student perspectives on AI-supported oral communication preparation in a Malaysian EAP context, offering practical insights for educators and policymakers navigating the complexities of technology-enhanced language learning.

Artificial Intelligence (AI); English for Academic Purposes (EAP); Group Discussion

1. Abbas, N. F. & Jasim, M. M. (2025). Using Chatbot and ChatGPT as useful tools in scientific academic writing. Research in Social Sciences, 8(4), 16-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdullah, A. T. H., Netra, I. M., & Hassan, I. (2024). Difficulties faced by undergraduate students in English public speaking at a Malaysian university. Arab World English Journal, 15(1) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aziz, A. A., & Kashinathan, S. (2021). ESL learners' challenges in speaking English in Malaysian classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 983-991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bhaskar, P., Joshi, A., Patwardhan, M., & Sharma, D. (2025). Group discussions and collaborative learning: Fostering soft skills in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 245-267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The risks and promises of information technologies for education. Westview Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cahyani, A. W., & Yudono, K. D. A. (2025). Magic School AI in designing Indonesian language learning for second grade with a deep learning paradigm. Journal of Educational Learning and Innovation, 5(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Darmi, R., & Albion, P. (2013). English language in the Malaysian education system: its existence and implications. In: 3rd Malaysian Postgraduate Conference (MPC2013), 4-5 July 2013, Education Malaysia Australia (EMA), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. (pp. 175-183). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dong, Y. (2023). Revolutionizing Academic English Writing through AI-Powered Pedagogy: Practical Exploration of Teaching Process and Assessment. Journal of Higher Education Research, 4(2), 52-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Du, X. (2024). AI chatbots in language learning: A review of recent developments. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 45-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Du, X., Yang, J., & Shelton, B. E. (2024). Enhancing EAP speaking with AI: Student experiences with EAP Talk. ReCALL, 36(1), 89-108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Halali, S., Kashefi, H., & Ismail, Z. (2022). Challenges faced by international students in academic writing and speaking. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hasanova, D. (2024). Group discussion as a pedagogical tool in EAP classrooms: Benefits and challenges. English for Specific Purposes, 73, 45-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ho, M. C. (2011). Academic discourse socialization through small-group discussions. System, 39(4), 437-450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hoque, M. S., Oli, L., Sarker, M. A. M., Shabnam, T., Ali, M. M., & Rajadurai, R. (2024). Assessing students’ perception of the effectiveness of group discussion in improving speaking skills. World Journal of English Language, 15(2), 68–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jones, J. F. (1999). From silence to talk: Cross-cultural ideas on students' participation in academic group discussion. English for Specific Purposes, 18(3), 243-259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kashinathan, S., & Aziz, A. A. (2021). ESL Learners’ Challenges in Speaking English in Malaysian Classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 983–991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Khan, A. A., Tabassum, M. A., & Umar, Z. (2024). Effect of Magic School AI tool on elementary students’ academic achievement. Al Khadim Research Journal of Islamic Culture and Civilization, 5(4), 13–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kim, N. Y., Cha, Y., & Kim, H. S. (2021). AI chatbots for pronunciation practice: An exploratory study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 892-918. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kim, S. (2006). Academic oral communication needs of East Asian international graduate students in non-science and non-engineering fields. English for Specific Purposes, 25(4), 479-489. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lee, S., Choe, H., Zou, D., & Jeon, J. (2025). Generative AI (GenAI) in the language classroom: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2498537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Liu, M. (2025). Evaluating EAP Talk: An AI-assisted speaking assessment tool. Assessing Writing, 63, 100856. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lawrence, G., Ahmed, F., Cole, C., & Johnston, K. P. (2020). Not more technology but more effective technology: Examining the state of technology integration in EAP programmes. RELC Journal, 51(1), 101–116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mahbob, M. H., Mahmud, M. S., & Bakar, K. A. (2020). Challenges in English language learning among Malaysian undergraduates. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 5(1), 269-289. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mahdi, H. S., & Al-Dera, A. S. J. (2013). The impact of teachers' age, gender and experience on the use of information and communication technology in EFL teaching. English Language Teaching, 6(6), 57-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Marzuki, M. (2023). Analysis of AI writing tools and their impact on student content generation. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 145-167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. McDonald, J. (2025). Students' reliance on AI technologies for text-based academic tasks. Computers & Education, 210, 105028. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mejia, R., & Loor, M. (2023). The role of group discussions in developing critical thinking in EAP contexts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 62, 101231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Meniado, J. C., Huyen, D. T. T., Panyadilokpong, N., & Lertkomolwit, P. (2024). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Experiences and perceptions of EFL learners in Thailand and Vietnam. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, (2024), 100313. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education). Ministry of Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Mun, J. (2024). Korean university students' use of ChatGPT for presentation preparation. STEM Journal, 25(1), 89-107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Rafek, M., Ramli, S., Iksan, H., Harith, N. M., & Abas, A. I. C. (2014). Gender and language: Communication apprehension in second language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,123, 90-96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Raj, L. A., Rahman, S. A., & Yamat, H. (2024). Speaking anxiety among ESL learners: Causes and coping strategies. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1), 567-583. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Tai, T. Y., & Chen, H. H. J. (2024). Improving elementary EFL speaking skills with generative AI chatbots: Exploring individual and paired interactions. Computers & Education, 220 (2024), 105112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Thirusanku, J., & Yunus, M. M. (2014). Status of English in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 10(14), 254-260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Toomaneejinda, A., & Harding, L. (2018). Disagreement practices in ELF academic group discussion: Verbal, nonverbal and interactional strategies. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 7(2), 307–332. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Tseng, Y. C., & Lin, Y. H. (2024). Enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Learners’ Writing with ChatGPT: A University-Level Course Design. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 22, (2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Wang, S., Iwata, J., & Okamoto, M. (2024). Incorporating ChatGPT in English Classrooms: A Case Study. 203–207. In Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Yang, W. (2022). Artificial intelligence in foreign language learning: Features, affordances, and challenges. Foreign Language World, 208(1), 20-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Youn, S. J., Kim, Y., & Lee, H. (2025). The role of AI tools in supporting reading, writing and analytical skills. Educational Technology & Society, 28(1), 112-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Yunus, M. M., Ang, W. S., & Hashim, H. (2021). Factors affecting teaching English as a second language (TESL) postgraduate students' behavioural intention for online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(6), 3524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Zhai, X., Wibowo, S., & Li, H. (2024). Over-reliance on AI: Implications for critical thinking in education. Computers in Human Behavior, 152, 108089. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Zhao, D. (2025). The impact of AI-enhanced natural language processing tools on writing proficiency: an analysis of language precision, content summarization, and creative writing facilitation. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 8055–8086. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Zhu, C., Sun, M., & Luo, J. (2025). MA TESOL students' attitudes toward AI speaking applications. System, 121, 103239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study