Exploring University Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of using Interactive Powerpoint Presentations as Instructional Materials to Enhance Class Engagement and Student Motivation

Authors

Jane Mae J. Marasigan

Central Bicol State University of Agriculture – Sipocot, College of Education (Philippines)

Gem Kenneth M. Opana

Central Bicol State University of Agriculture – Sipocot, College of Education (Philippines)

Gwyneth B. Quinones

Central Bicol State University of Agriculture – Sipocot, College of Education (Philippines)

Missy A. Realizan

Central Bicol State University of Agriculture – Sipocot, College of Education (Philippines)

Jhon Vincent S. Severo

Central Bicol State University of Agriculture – Sipocot, College of Education (Philippines)

Archie A. Perpetua

Central Bicol State University of Agriculture – Sipocot, College of Education (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200189

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 2491-2499

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-18

Accepted: 2025-12-24

Published: 2026-01-06

Abstract

This research investigates the perceptions of pre-service teachers at Central Bicol State University of Agriculture – Sipocot Campus regarding the integration of Interactive PowerPoint Presentations (IPPs) as modern instructional materials. Utilizing a quantitative, descriptive-evaluative research design, the study gathered data from 60 participants through purposive sampling to assess how these digital tools impact student motivation and classroom engagement. The findings reveal a highly positive perception among pre-service teachers, who strongly agree that IPPs are essential for fostering active student participation (mean = 3.78) and enhancing their own instructional creativity (mean = 3.75). Despite these pedagogical benefits, the study identifies a significant gap between technological awareness and actual implementation due to various barriers. The most critical challenges identified include a pressing need for specialized tutorials and training (mean = 3.27), frequent technical interruptions during lessons (mean = 3.23), and the unavailability of functioning classroom equipment (mean = 3.17). To mitigate these obstacles, pre-service teachers predominantly rely on proactive technical strategies, such as testing presentations before class sessions and utilizing offline versions to bypass unreliable internet connectivity (mean = 3.65). The study concludes that while IPPs are recognized as effective tools for 21st-century pedagogy, their full potential remains hindered by limited technological competence and inadequate infrastructure. Consequently, it is recommended that educational institutions prioritize continuous professional development and improve school facilities to ensure that future educators can effectively transition toward more interactive, technology-driven teaching environments.

Keywords

Interactive PowerPoint, Pre-service Teachers, Instructional Materials, Technology Integration, Student Engagement, Multimedia Learning, Pedagogical Strategies.

Downloads

References

1. Al Fajar, B., & Mayar, F. (2023). Interactive PowerPoint media in Grade IV elementary school. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(3), 391-398. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JERE/article/view/66424 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alharbi, A., & Ahmad, N. (2020). The impact of interactive PowerPoint presentations on student engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 45-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arsad, H., & Mangindra, A. (2025). Teaching literature using interactive PowerPoint presentation for Grade 8 students at Banisil National High School. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 6(Special Issue), 155-170. https://ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/485 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fauzi, A., & Zulfahmi, I. (2020). Multimedia learning and student motivation in the classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 215-230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hidayah, N., & Rahmawati, F. (2021). Developing pre-service teachers’ creativity through interactive instructional media. Journal of Teacher Education, 12(1), 77-88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Law, E. L., Sun, X., & He, Y. (2023). Challenges and impacts of technology adoption in education: A systematic review. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. Challenges and Impacts of Technology Adoption in Education: A Systematic Literature Review – International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Multimedia Learning | Cambridge Aspire website [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ramos, A., Lee, H., & Mabuan, R. A. (2025). Exploring the relationship among preservice teachers’ e-learning readiness, learning engagement, and learning performance in HyFlex learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(2), 89-110. https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/8165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2021). A comprehensive analysis of preservice teachers’ ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 157, 103968. Measuring digital literacy across three age cohorts: Exploring test dimensionality and performance differences - ScienceDirect [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles