Leadership for Inclusion: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Collaboration with Teachers, Families, And Communities

Cooperation between teachers, families, and communities is a well-known platform of inclusive education, but the representation of it in policy and leadership documents often demonstrates a disconnect between the symbolic and the real worlds. The current research investigated collaboration within the frames of publicly available online resources concerning leadership to be included. The research had four aims including attempting to conceptualize collaboration, emphasizing practices that are overemphasized or underemphasized, evaluating the level of emphasizing collaboration symbolically and practically, and exploring issues that impede collaboration and how inclusive leadership is relevant. A qualitative content analysis of the data was performed with the help of the thematic coding to determine recurrent patterns and tensions according to the Bowen document analysis framework. The results show that the idea of collaboration is always placed at the top in terms of the inclusive leadership but often articulated in the form of aspirational words instead of being implemented in the form of sustainable structures and accountability systems. There is a focus on teacher collaboration especially in professional learning communities and mentoring, but little to no family or community partnerships which are predominantly event-driven. The primary barriers are the unavailability of resources, work overload among the teachers, the absence of training, cultural stigma and poor accountability mechanisms. Such issues are addressed through inclusive leadership by institutionalizing teamwork, strengthening partnerships, building professional capacity, and promoting culturally responsive practices.

Inclusive leadership; Collaboration; Teacher professional learning communities

1. Ainscow, M., & Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: The role of organisational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802504903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2020). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(6), 943–963. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Epstein, J. L. (2024). Lessons learned on design and structure [Slide deck]. Ohio Statewide Family Engagement Center. https://ohiofamiliesengage.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Session-8_Joyce-Epstein.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Garbacz, S. A., McDowall, P. S., Schaughency, E., Sheridan, S. M., & Welch, G. W. (2020). A multidimensional examination of parent involvement and student outcomes. School Psychology Review, 49(3), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1734010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hickey, N., Flaherty, A., & Mannix McNamara, P. (2022). Distributed leadership: A scoping review mapping current empirical research. Societies, 12(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12010015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hong, X., Li, Q., Wang, L., & Pang, Y. (2023). Linking distributed leadership with differentiated instruction in inclusive schools: The mediating roles of teacher leadership and professional competence. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ishimaru, A. M., Acevedo, M., Solorzano, D., & Gonzalez, N. (2023). Outcomes of a virtual community of practice with community navigators aimed at fostering family–school–community partnerships. Social Sciences, 14(3), Article 162. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/3/162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Keddie, A. (2021). The politics of inclusive education: A critical examination. Educational Review, 73(4), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1695090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Khalifa, M. A., Gooden, M. A., & Davis, J. E. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316630383 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Learning Policy Institute. (2025). How community schools improve outcomes. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Makhmetova, Z., Karabassova, L., Zhakim, A., & Karinov, A. (2025). Exploring the effects of professional learning experiences on in-service teachers’ growth: A systematic review of literature. Education Sciences, 15(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Morrissey, B. (2021). Theorising leadership for inclusion in the Irish context: A triadic typology within a distributed ecosystem. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(3), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620942507 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Norwich, B. (2022). Inclusive education and systems change: The need for a multi-level framework. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(10), 1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1853254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume II): Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. OECD. (2022). Supporting teacher professional learning. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/6e10aeed-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ozamiz-Etxebarria, N., Berasategi, N., Idoiaga Mondragon, N., & Dosil Santamaria, M. (2023). Prevalence of burnout among teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3197. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pushor, D., & Amendt, T. (2022). Leading for equity through parent engagement in schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1854841 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. RAND Corporation. (2020). Illustrating the promise of community schools. https://www.rand.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. RAND Corporation. (2020). Illustrating the promise of community schools: An assessment of the impact of the New York City Community Schools Initiative. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3245.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tandfonline. (2024). Distributed leadership in Irish post-primary schools: Mapping the state of the art. Irish Educational Studies, 43(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2024.2359697 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. UNESCO & International Task Force on Teachers for Education 2030. (2025). Global report on teachers: What you need to know. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/global-report-teachers-what-you-need-know UNESCO. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024/5: Leadership for learning. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org/reports/gem-report/en/2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. University of Arkansas, Department of Education Reform. (2025). The role of relational trust and intentional care in fostering head of school effectiveness (EDRE Working Paper 2025-02). https://edre.uark.edu/_resources/pdf/edrewp-2025-02.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. van Laere, K., & Warin, B. (2025). Cultivating inclusive schools: The role of extended professional communities. Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2025.2548263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wang, F., Pollock, K., & Hauseman, D. C. (2022). Inclusive school leadership and student engagement: The mediating role of teacher collaboration. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(6), 1069–1084. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2021-006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wang, Z., & Dai, Y. (2024). A meta-analysis of the correlation between professional learning communities and teacher efficacy/behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 143, 104536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104536 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zheng, X., & Li, M. (2025). A systematic review of systems leadership in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study