Tablet Translation in English Learning: A Single Case Study

Authors

Oluwatimilehin Amos Akinade

University of Greater Manchester, Bolton, Greater Manchester (United Kingdom)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0019

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 244-251

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-20

Accepted: 2025-12-27

Published: 2026-01-06

Abstract

The single case study under consideration explores how tablet-enabled translation assisted in facilitating inclusive education in an English classroom of Year 7 at an English high school. Using Sociocultural Theory that focuses on learning as a process that is socially mediated (Vygotsky, 1978), the paper discusses how an Arabic-speaking new student could gain access to the content of the curriculum, become an engaged and active participant by using a tablet-based translation tool. Real-time translation of learning materials and assessments prompted the student to work alongside peers equitably. The data sources comprised worksheets, handwritten notes, translated outputs, classroom observations and teacher reflections which were analysed thematically to determine the patterns of access, engagement, and social inclusion. Ethical measures covered anonymisation and confidentiality. The findings of this one case study indicate how widespread digital tools may reduce the language barrier, level the playing field, and teach the inclusive pedagogy in a classroom environment.

Keywords

Tablet-assisted translation; Inclusive education

Downloads

References

1. Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. BERA. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). British Educational Research Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bower, M. (2019). Design of technology-enhanced learning: Integrating research and practice. Emerald Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Byram, M. (2020). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence: Revisited. Multilingual matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cents-Boonstra, M., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Denessen, E., Aelterman, N., & Haerens, L. (2021). Fostering student engagement with motivating teaching: An observation study of teacher and student behaviours. Research Papers in Education, 36(6), 754-779. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1767184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Farley, I. A., & Burbules, N. C. (2022). Online education viewed through an equity lens: Promoting engagement and success for all learners. Review of Education, 10(3), e3367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Garcia, I., & Pena, M. I. (2011). Machine translation-assisted language learning: Writing for beginners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.582687 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Groves, M., & Mundt, K. (2015). Friend or foe? Google Translate in language for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lee, J., Warschauer, M., & Lee, H. (2019). The effects of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 184–202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. OECD. (2021). The state of global education: Addressing inclusion and equity. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Peel, K. L. (2021). Professional dialogue in researcher-teacher collaborations: Exploring practices for effective student learning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(2), 201-219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Peters, O. (2010). Distance education in transition: Developments and issues (5th ed.). BIS Verlag. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pimmer, C., Mateescu, M., & Gröhbiel, U. (2020). Mobile and ubiquitous learning in higher education settings: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 490–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Saito, H., & Ebsworth, M. E. (2004). Seeing English language teaching and learning through the eyes of Japanese EFL and ESL students. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 111–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tait, A. (2018). Education for development: From distance to open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(2), 101–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. UNESCO. (2020). Education in a multilingual world. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles