A Two-Week Brand Incubation Model for Design Education: A Practice-Based Study

Authors

You Xuemin

Faculty of Industrial Product Design, Chengdu Academy of Fine Arts, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province (China)

Wang Ling

Faculty of Industrial Product Design, Chengdu Academy of Fine Arts, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province (China)

Zhang Ruidan

Faculty of Industrial Product Design, Chengdu Academy of Fine Arts, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province (China)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200229

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 3009-3019

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-21

Accepted: 2025-12-27

Published: 2026-01-12

Abstract

In contemporary design education, short-term teaching formats often struggle to translate brand strategy and design management into coherent and tangible design outcomes. This study proposes a Two-Week Brand Incubation Model as a practice-based pedagogical framework for industrial design education, aiming to bridge strategic thinking and design execution within a compressed timeframe. The model structures an intensive learning process in which student teams simulate early-stage brand development through brand positioning, user research, design language systems, user experience mapping and product visualisation. A role-based team structure is introduced to reflect interdisciplinary professional practice. Using a practice-based research approach, the study analyses course implementation, design artefacts and reflective documentation. Findings indicate that the incubation model supports the development of systemic design thinking, strategic coherence and collaborative competence, demonstrating higher efficiency in aligning brand strategy with design outcomes compared with conventional studio projects. The study contributes a replicable and transferable pedagogical framework for integrating brand strategy into short-term design education.

Keywords

Design education, Brand incubation, Brand strategy

Downloads

References

1. Artusi, F., Bellis, P., & Verganti, R. (2025). When products speak differently: Designing new languages for established products. Creativity and Innovation Management, 34(2), 297-311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Best, K. (2010). The fundamentals of design management. Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Borja de Mozota, B. (2006). The four powers of design: A value model in design management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. Journal of product innovation management, 28(3), 381-383. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2018). Practice-Based Research in the Creative Arts. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cankurtaran, P., Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. J. (2024). Defining design orientation: A field-based discovery approach. Technovation, 131, 102943. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cesinger, B., & Dittenberger, S. (2025). Shaping Entrepreneurial Design Identity in Design Education. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 11(1), 61-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2021). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: a review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 90-115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chernev, A. (2025). Strategic brand management. cerebellum press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cooper, R., Junginger, S., & Lockwood, T. (2009). Design thinking and design management: A research and practice perspective. Design Management Review, 20(2), 46-55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cross, N. (2023). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. De Mozota, B. B., & Wolff, F. (2019). Forty years of research in design management: a review of literature and directions for the future. Strategic Design Research Journal, 12(1), 4-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ding, Y., Ma, L., Kong, M. S. M., & Pereira Neto, M. J. (2025). Brand mark scale: A new kind of quantitative evaluation design. The Design Journal, 1-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 103-120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hwang, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025). Graphic Design Education in the Era of Text‐to‐Image Generation: Transitioning to Contents Creator. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 44(1), 239-253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kapferer, J. N. (2012). The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking. Kogan page publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Karjalainen, T. M. (2007). It looks like a Toyota: Educational approaches to designing for visual brand recognition. International Journal of design, 1(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kolb, D. A. (2013). The process of experiential learning. In Culture and processes of adult learning (pp. 138-156). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Krippendorff, K. (2005). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. crc Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. MIT press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sabatelli, M. (2024). A Designer’s Lexicon: An Ethnographic Exploration of Language in Design Practice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Valkenburg, R., & Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design studies, 19(3), 249-271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Xuemin, Y., Legino, R., & Xiao, P. (2023). Innovation on Cultural and Creative Product–Designing Traditional Chinese Poetry into Product. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 8(SI16), 129–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles