Identifying Conceptual Gaps in Senior High School Chemistry Through a PISA-Aligned Assessment Framework
Authors
Department of Science and Mathematics Education Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)
Department of Science and Mathematics Education Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0026
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 355-364
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-24
Accepted: 2025-12-30
Published: 2026-01-14
Abstract
Scientific literacy–oriented assessment has become a central goal of contemporary science education; however, Chemistry assessment practices in many senior high school contexts remain largely recall-based and offer limited diagnostic value for identifying students’ conceptual learning gaps. Within the Philippine setting, locally developed assessment tools aligned with the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Science Framework remain scarce. This study examined the Chemistry mastery levels of Grade 12 students using a PISAaligned assessment instrument and identified least mastered content areas to inform instructional planning. Using a descriptive research design, data were gathered from Grade 12 students through a researcher-developed, PISAaligned Chemistry questionnaire. Analysis of students’ performance revealed that a majority did not meet expected proficiency levels, indicating substantial learning gaps. Topic-level results showed that Nuclear Chemistry, Chemical Reactions, and Atomic Structure were the least mastered areas, while performance was comparatively stronger in Chemistry in Everyday Life, suggesting greater understanding in applied and contextualized content. The findings highlight the value of PISA-aligned assessments as diagnostic tools for revealing topic-specific learning gaps and supporting evidence-informed instructional decisions. The study underscores the need for targeted instructional interventions and assessment practices that prioritize conceptual understanding and scientific literacy, particularly in abstract and conceptually demanding areas of Chemistry
Keywords
Chemistry performance, PISA-aligned
Downloads
References
1. Cabural, A. (2024). Beyond benchmarking: A diagnostic inquiry into the underlying determinants of low performance in Philippine PISA science. Journal of Tertiary Education and Learning, 2(3), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v2i3.3063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bernardo, A. B. I., Cordel, M. O., Calleja, M. O., Teves, J. M. M., Yap, S. A., & Chua, U. C. (2023). Profiling low-proficiency science students in the Philippines using machine learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01705-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Grieger, K., Hill, B., & Leontyev, A. (2022). Exploring curriculum adoption of green and sustainable chemistry in undergraduate organic chemistry courses: Results from a national survey in the United States. Green Chemistry, 24(22), 8770–8782. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2gc02999e [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Getu, G. T., Mebrahitu, G. K., & Yohannes, G. (2024). Effects of context-based teaching chemistry on students’ achievement: A systematic review. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 19(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v19i2.6458 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Intasoi, S., Junpeng, P., Tang, K. N., Ketchatturat, J., Zhang, Y., & Wilson, M. (2020). Developing an assessment framework of multidimensional scientific competencies. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(4), 963. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Naseer, F., & Khawaja, S. (2025). Mitigating conceptual learning gaps in mixed-ability classrooms: A learning analytics-based evaluation of AI-driven adaptive feedback for struggling learners. Applied Sciences, 15(8), 4473. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084473 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Oliveri, M. E., & Lawless, R. (2018). The validity of inferences from locally developed assessments administered globally. ETS Research Report Series, 2018(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2018-assessment-and-analytical-framework_b25efab8-en.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Sayre, J., Nabua, E., Salic-Hairulla, M., Alcopra, A., & Fernandez, M. J. (2025). Assessing general chemistry learning gaps: A needs assessment of competency mastery among Grade 11 learners. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(IV), 6518–6524. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90400472 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Taglorin, H. L. L., Nabua, E. B., Latonio, B. C., & Bolocon Jr., A. (2025). Least mastered competencies in Grade 10 chemistry and their motivation levels: A basis for pedagogical intervention. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(II), 1008–1021. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.9020081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Tasquier, G., Knain, E., & Jornet, A. (2022). Scientific literacies for change making: Equipping the young to tackle current societal challenges. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.689329 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Teig, N. (2023). Uncovering student strategies for solving scientific inquiry tasks: Insights from student process data in PISA. Research in Science Education, 54(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10134-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Van den Broeck, L., De Laet, T., Dujardin, R., Tuyaerts, S., & Langie, G. (2024). Unveiling the competencies at the core of lifelong learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 45, 100646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100646 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Vo, D. V., & Simmie, G. M. (2024). Assessing scientific inquiry: A systematic literature review of tasks, tools and techniques. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10498-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Zhang, L., Liu, X., & Feng, H. (2023). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing scientific literacy from junior to senior high school. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00093-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study