Best Teaching Practices for Enhancing Teacher Competence in Electrical and Electronic: A Recent Systematic Review
Authors
Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat (Malaysia)
Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200260
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 3384-3403
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-31
Accepted: 2026-01-05
Published: 2026-01-15
Abstract
This systematic literature review investigates optimal pedagogical practices for improving teacher proficiency in electrical and electronic education, addressing the growing demand for innovative teaching methods that correspond with technological progress and professional development. The rapid expansion of Industry 4.0 and digitalization in education necessitates that electrical and electronic teachers exhibit not only technical skills but also digital literacy, pedagogical adaptability and socio-emotional awareness. However, present research remains fragmented, with no coherent synthesis linking technology-enhanced learning, digital competence and professional development. Guided by the PRISMA protocol, this review systematically analyzed literature retrieved from two major academic databases Web of Science and Scopus using the keywords "best teaching practices," "teacher competence," "electrical and electronic education," and "teaching strategies." The review concentrated on journal articles released in 2025, yielding 27 primary studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis revealed three principal themes: (1) Technology-Enhanced Pedagogical Innovations and Learning Tools, emphasizing simulation-based, AI-driven, and interactive teaching environments; (2) Digital Literacy, Information Literacy, and Online Learning Environments, highlighting the role of digital competence and virtual learning ecosystems in improving instructional quality; and (3) Teacher Professional Development, Curriculum Reform, and Socio-Cultural Dimensions, focusing on reflective practice, gender responsiveness and cultural adaptability in technical education. The results show that there is a strong global push to combine digital and socio-constructivist methods to improve teacher competence, even though there are still some methodological and contextual issues. This review concludes that developing teacher competence in electrical and electronic education requires a holistic framework that bridges technology, pedagogy, and cultural context. The synthesized evidence contributes to advancing policy, curriculum innovation, and teacher education programs, offering a comprehensive foundation for future research and practice in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET).
Keywords
Best Teaching Practices; Teacher Competence; Electrical and Electronic Education; Teaching Strategies.
Downloads
References
1. Abenir, M. A. D., Mendoza, L. K. T., Advincula-Lopez, L. V, & Panlilio, E. G. (2025). Elevating Community Voices to Reexamine Student Cultural Sensitivity and Adaptability in Electronic Service-Learning (e-SL). Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 29(1), 61–78. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105007355379&partnerID=40&md5=6f68939b09471abc68b0c2226cca48d0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abouzahra, A., Sabraoui, A., & Afdel, K. (2020). Model composition in Model Driven Engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 125(May), 106316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adăscăliței, A. A., Zein El-Din, A. S. E.-D., Arădoaei, S. T., Temneanu, M. C., & Istrate, M. D. (2021). The Blended Teaching and Learning Methods and the Implementation of Online Laboratories in Electrical and Computer Engineering Education Programs. In M. E. Auer & T. Rüütmann (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1329, pp. 136–147). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68201-9_14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Agonas, K. C., Codilla, L. L., Goloran, R., & Canomay, K. M. (2024). Readiness and Challenges Faced by Elementary Public School Teachers on Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Integration in the Philippines. 2024 International Conference on TVET Excellence and Development, ICTeD 2024, 162–165. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTeD62334.2024.10844625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Aitymova, A., Shaporeva, A., Kopnova, O., Petrova, A., Karymsakova, A., Abildinova, G., Iklassova, K., & Aitymov, Z. (2025). DESIGNING AN INTELLIGENT SYSTEM FOR PERSONALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF GRAPHOMOTOR SKILLS IN PRESCHOOL CHILDREN BASED ON ANALYSIS OF DEVIATIONS FROM THE STANDARD. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(2), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.337036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Al-Barakat, A. A., AlAli, R. M., al-Hassan, O. M., & Aboud, Y. Z. (2025). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Electronic Games-Based Learning in Enhancing Children’s Multiplication Skills and Cognitive Achievement. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(5), 947–954. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.5.2301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Alptekin, Z., & Taneri, A. (2025). Technology ıntegration in pedagogical processes: digital competence and teaching practices of primary school teachers in Turkey. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00646-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Alqahtani, R. N., & Almassaad, A. Z. (2025). The Effect of a training program based on the (TAWOCK) model for teaching computational thinking skills on teaching self- efficacy among female computer teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 30(5), 6687–6705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13088-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Appiah-Okyere, J. A., Taana Smith, D., Kwaa-Aidoo, E. K., McKnight, L. W., & Osae, E. M. (2023). Transforming Teachers’ Professional Development with Technology Innovation Integration in Essuekyir, Ghana. 2023 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, GHTC 2023, 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC56179.2023.10354622 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Avci, H., & Pedersen, S. J. (2023). Systematic Literature Review of Teachers’ Digital Competence in K-12 Education: Defining the Concept. In P. Blikstein, V. A. J, R. Kizito, & K. Brennan (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS (pp. 898–901). International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105005958077&partnerID=40&md5=2b222ab6c5639455b61e88c4ae34af07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Balogun, M., Akodu, B., Olubodun, T., Yesufu, V., Chima-Oduko, A., Oderinu, O., & Shoemaker, D. (2025). Acceptability, facilitators and barriers to video-based learning at a community health offifficers’ training school in Nigeria. Health Professions Education, 11(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.55890/2452-3011.1342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Canet, M., Asuncion Perez-Pascual, M., Atarés, L., & Trujillo, M. (2025). Helping First-Year University Students to Overcome the Threshold Concept of Ohm’s Law. IEEE Transactions on Education, 68(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2024.3468002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Chaouqui, M., Bezrhoud, H., Erragragui, M., Azelmad, K., Mellouki, A., Rahmani, J., & Ammi, O. B. (2025). The level of cognitive and behavioral representation gender consideration among trainee teachers in Morocco. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1568307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Cui, M., Li, Y., He, X., & Zhou, R. (2024). Data-driven Analysis and Evaluation of Pedagogical Innovation. 2024 4th International Conference on Educational Technology, ICET 2024, 527–531. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET62460.2024.10867986 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Dijju, S., Shah, V., & Raghunandan, A. (2025). Challenges to Digital Readiness in K-12 Education: Insights from Indian Schools. In Lecture Notes in Educational Technology: Vol. Part F850 (pp. 350–359). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-5761-2_26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ellederová, E., & Denysenko, V. (2025). Students’ and Teachers’ Attitudes Towards CLIL in the Interdisciplinary Study Program English in Electrical Engineering and Informatics. TESL-EJ, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28112a8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. ElSayary, A., & Mohebi, L. (2025). Fostering preservice teachers socio-emotional, technological, and metacognitive knowledge (STM-K) using e-portfolios. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 2095–2122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12894-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Endryansyah, E., Suprianto, B., Rusimamto, P. W., Anifah, L., & Wardhono, A. (2025). Utilization of Automation Studio Software to Improve the Creative Thinking Abilities of Electrical Engineering Students in Designing Electropneumatic Circuits. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 39(1), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2025/v39i1/25123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Gao, C., Li, Z., & Zheng, L. (2024). Develop and validate a scale to measure primary and secondary teachers’ digital teaching competence. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 10763–10789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12228-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. González-Medina, I., Gavín-Chocano, Ó., Pérez-Navío, E., & Maldonado Berea, G. A. (2025). Trajectories of Digital Teaching Competence: A Multidimensional PLS-SEM Study in University Contexts. Information (Switzerland), 16(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/info16050373 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Gümüş, M. M., & Kukul, V. (2023). Developing a digital competence scale for teachers: validity and reliability study. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2747–2765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11213-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Hidayat, H., Tanucan, J. C. M., Harmanto, D., Dewi, F. K., Dewi, I. P., Anori, S., & Agustiarmi, W. (2024). The Influence of Augmented Reality Mobile App on Electronics Engineering Students’ Self-Competence. TEM Journal, 13(3), 2310–2318. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM133-58 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Horváth, L., M. Pintér, T., Misley, H., & Dringó-Horváth, I. (2025). Validity evidence regarding the use of DigCompEdu as a self-reflection tool: The case of Hungarian teacher educators. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12914-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Ikram, H., Buzdar, M. A., & Hanif, S. (2021). Virtual Reality for Enhancing Student Teachers’ Science Competencies. In Innovative Education Technologies for 21st Century Teaching and Learning (pp. 15–28). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003143796-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Jelovica, L., Erceg, N., & Bilušic, A. (2023). Application of the Arduino Computer Platform as a Multimeter in Education. In N. Callaos, E. Gaile-Sarkane, S. Hashimoto, N. Lace, B. Sanchez, & M. Savoie (Eds.), Proceedings of World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, WMSCI (Vols. 2023-September, pp. 422–428). International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.54808/WMSCI2023.01.422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Kalenskyi, A., Borodiyenko, O., Pavliuk, L., Vanina, N., & Hrytsenok, I. (2025). Methodical System for Development of the Professional Competence of Future Electrical Engineering Teachers: Experimental Verification of Implementation. In F. J. G. Silva, V. Ivanov, A. Pinto, & R. C. M. Sales-Contini (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (pp. 136–147). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-96413-8_13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Kuang, Y., & Duan, B. (2025). Evidence-Based Curriculum Reform: A Data-Driven Framework for Educational Planning and Governance in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 30(3), 501–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-025-09909-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Lapisa, R., Syaifullah, L., Maksum, H., Irfan, D., Rifdarmon, & Nanda, I. (2025). Digital Technology Innovation in TVET: Rifdarmon-Based E-Learning Model Enhancing Learning Outcomes and 4C Skills. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia, 5. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251491 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Leshabane, E. T., Mokgosi, P. N., & Maile, S. (2025). Teachers’ Perspectives on the Implementation of E-Learning in Secondary Schools of Gauteng Province, South Africa. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(7), 776–797. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.7.38 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Listiani, N., Jatmoko, D., Widiyoko, E. P., & Kurniawan, A. (2023). Application of problem based learning method to master the electrical system competence. In M. Setiyo, Z. B. Pambuko, C. B. E. Praja, A. Setiawan, V. S. Dewi, F. Yuliastuti, & L. Muliawanti (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2706). American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0120437 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Liu, L. (2025). Enhancing educational training and learning outcomes through a hybrid experience created by integrating augmented reality and virtual reality technologies. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 25(3), 2310–2321. https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978241312994 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. López, J. D., Quintero-Zea, A., Sucerquia, A., & Mercado, N. (2024). A B-learning strategy for teaching electric circuits. 16th Congreso de Tecnologia, Aprendizaje y Ensenanza de La Electronica, TAEE 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAEE59541.2024.10605018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Lu, Y., & Li, G. (2025). Enhancing Electric Machine Education: An Integrated Approach Using 3D-Printed Models, Multiple Intelligences, and Gamifica-tion. In A. R. Kamali & A. Rezaei (Eds.), Proceedings of 2025 6th International Conference on Education, Knowledge and Information Management, ICEKIM 2025 (pp. 1–5). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3756580.3756581 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Marques, M. M., & Pombo, L. (2021). The impact of teacher training using mobile augmented reality games on their professional development. Education Sciences, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080404 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Marwan, A., & Wahyudi, W. (2025). Examining Users’ Voices of Cambridge Online Learning as A Medium for English Language Learning. Educational Process: International Journal, 15. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.15.134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Mat, H., Nusantara, T., Atmoko, A., Hanafi, Y., & Mustakim, S. S. (2025). Need analysis: development of a teaching module for enhancing higher-order thinking skills of primary school students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(3), 1643–1650. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i3.30335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. McGarr, O. (2024). Exploring and reflecting on the influences that shape teacher professional digital competence frameworks. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 30(4), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2313641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, A. D. (2009). PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram. In The PRISMA statement (Vol. 6, p. 1000097). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Mulyanti, R. Y., Wati, L. N., Tusminurdin, U., & Soma, A. M. (2024). Determinants of teacher digital competence: Empirical evidence of vocational schools in Indonesia. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(3), 1517–1530. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.3.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Munje, P. N., & Jita, T. (2020). The impact of the lack of ICT resources on teaching and learning in selected South African primary schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(7), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.19.7.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Ntetha, Z., & Taole, M. J. (2025). Factors Influencing Workforce Development of TVET Graduates: A Case Study of Electrical Engineering Students in a TVET College in South Africa. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 17(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2025.17.02.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Nurbekova, G., Orazbayeva, B., Dildabek, A., & Zhilmagambetova, R. (2025). The Use of Information Technology in Preparation for International Educational Research. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(8), 1743–1751. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.8.2375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Nurhidayat, E., Mujiyanto, J., Yuliasri, I., & Hartono, R. (2024). Technology integration and teachers’ competency in the development of 21st-century learning in EFL classroom. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(2), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Olarinde, A. J., & Garcio-Quismondo, M. A. M. (2025). Information Literacy in the Context of Electronic Learning in India: a Phenomenographic Study. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 10(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2025.1.47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Medicina Fluminensis, 57(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Rodriguez-Gomez, A., Granados-Fernández, R., Lacasa, E., Fernandez-Marchante, C. M., & Rodrigo, M. A. (2025). How to teach frequency response easily to chemical engineers using spreadsheets. Education for Chemical Engineers, 53, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2025.06.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Šabić, J., Baranović, B., & Rogošić, S. (2022). Teachers’ Self-efficacy for Using Information and Communication Technology: The Interaction Effect of Gender and Age. Informatics in Education, 21(2), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2022.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Salmaini, S., Handrianto, C., Sartono, S., & Nor-Azhar, N. F. (2025). Augmented reality competencies and integration challenges among primary school teacher education students: a mixed-methods study. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 73(1), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2025.1.42 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Samantray, A., Behera, R. R., & Acharya, A. K. (2024). Effectiveness of ICT-integrated pedagogy on pre-service teachers’ teaching competence in mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1401188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Saraç, S., Gülay Ogelman, H., Yurtseven, N., & Akgün, E. (2025). Learning to support self-regulation: empowering preschool teachers through understanding by design and blended learning. Teacher Development, 29(3), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2024.2408373 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Skantz-Åberg, E., Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., & Williams, P. (2022). Teachers’ professional digital competence: an overview of conceptualisations in the literature. In Cogent Education (Vol. 9, Issue 1). Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2063224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Surpare, K., Klinbumrung, K., Sukmak, P., & Udomchaibanjerd, J. (2024). Development Model of Self-Directed Learning with Digital Content Media to Enhance Electrical Teaching Skills for Students of Teacher Training Program. 9th International STEM Education Conference, ISTEM-Ed 2024 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/iSTEM-Ed62750.2024.10663113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Suryoputro, G., & Hikmat, A. (2025). Impact of The Integration of Generative AI-Automatic Corrective Feedback on Academic Writing Skills. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(5), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.5.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Tanak, A. (2020). Designing tpack-based course for preparing student teachers to teach science with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Tian, D., Lin, Y., Yang, Y., Xia, R., Lai, Y., Zhou, Y., Yang, Y., He, J., Wang, Q., & Su, X. (2025). “A multi-pronged teaching” approach: Effects of the “IMAGE” teaching mode on the learning of evidence-based practice by nursing postgraduates. Nurse Education Today, 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106677 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Tomar, A. S., Arya, K. V, & Rajput, S. S. (2025). Learning face super-resolution through identity features and distilling facial prior knowledge. Expert Systems with Applications, 262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Tomášková, T., Krotky, J., & Honzikova, J. (2025). Innovative Approach to Teaching Sustainable Development at Teacher Training College Through Project for Secondary Use of Recycled Electrical Materials †. Engineering Proceedings, 103(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025103002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Tselegkaridis, S., Sapounidis, T., & Triantafyllou, S. A. (2025). Educators’ intention to use tangible and graphical experimentation with Arduino and Micro:bit. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00398-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Vuorikari, R., Pokropek, A., & Muñoz, J. C. (2025). Enhancing digital skills assessment: introducing compact tools for measuring digital competence. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09825-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Widiawati, H., Sujarwo, S., & Saptono, B. (2025). The Effectiveness of Electronic Use of Moodle-Assisted Modules in Student Numeracy Literacy Learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(8), 1729–1742. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.8.2374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Yu, L., Zhang, Y., & Sun, M. (2025). Factors affecting middle school students’ information literacy in the internet plus education environment. Journal of Computers in Education, 12(2), 421–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00316-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Zaker, B., Shirazi, B. N., & Aftabi, E. (2024). Innovative Implementation, Evaluation, and Impact of Pedagogies in Industrial Electronics Education. 11th International and the 17th National Conference on E-Learning and E-Teaching, ICeLeT 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICeLeT62507.2024.10493106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Zhang, A. (2025). Human Computer Interaction System for Teacher-Student Interaction Model Using Machine Learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(3), 1817–1828. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2115645 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study