Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices and Their Relationship to Students’ Academic Performance in Science

Authors

Honey Lord D. Penton

Mst-Biology Davao Del Norte State College Institute of Advanced Studies (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200272

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 3526-3535

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-18

Accepted: 2025-12-25

Published: 2026-01-15

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical practices and students’ academic performance in science at Consuelo M. Valderrama National High School during the academic year 2025–2026. A quantitative descriptive–correlational research design was employed. Using stratified random sampling, 120 students from Grades 7–10 were selected as respondents. Teachers’ pedagogical practices were assessed using an adapted questionnaire covering course organization and planning, communication, teacher–student interaction, assignments, exams and grading, and supplementary instructional methods. Students’ academic performance was measured using official first-quarter Science grades based on the Department of Education (DepEd) K–12 grading standards.

Keywords

Pedagogical practices, academic performance, science education, secondary students

Downloads

References

1. Almerino, P. M., Ocampo, L. A., Abellana, D. P. M., Almerino, J. G. F., Mamites, I. O., Pinili, L. C., Tenerife, J. J. L., Sitoy, R. E., Abelgas, L. J., & Peteros, E. D. (2020). Evaluating the academic performance of K–12 students in the Philippines: A standardized evaluation approach. Education Research International, 2020, Article 8877712. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8877712 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brew, E. A., Nketiah, B., & Koranteng, R. (2021). A literature review of academic performance: An insight into factors and their influences on academic outcomes of students at senior high schools. Open Access Library Journal, 8(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Fox, R. A., & Hackerman, D. G. (2003). Evaluating and improving teaching effectiveness. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787403004001004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Genelza, G., Lapined, F., Suarez, S., Alvez, M., Cabrera, C., & Sabandal, R. (2022). Problems in speaking performance of Grade 8 Jade of Tagum City National High School. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202205.0093.v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ladrero, H., Villanueva, A. V., & Mirasol, M. (2020). Factors that cause low academic performance among Grade 12 HUMSS strand students in Bestlink College of the Philippines. Ascendens Asia Singapore–Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1). https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/aasgbcpjmra/article/view/2645 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Maksimović, J., & Evtimov, J. (2023). Positivism and post-positivism as the basis of quantitative research in pedagogy. Research in Pedagogy, 13(1), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2301208m [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Thomas, D., & Zubkov, P. (2023). Quantitative research designs. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370630979 Quantitative Research Designs [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Thomas, L. (2023, December 18). Simple random sampling: Definition, steps, and examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/simple-random-sampling/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Wu, B., & Xin, Y. (2019). Investigation and study on the causes of college students’ poor academic performances and intervention mechanism: Taking college students in Xi’an as an example. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/iccese-19.2019.364 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles