Learning Gaps in Chemistry: A Strand-Based Analysis of Senior High School Students

This study examined the level of mastery in chemistry competencies among 81 Grade 12 students from the Accountancy, Business, and Management (ABM), Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS), and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) strands in a public senior high school in Dumingag, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines. The study aimed to identify strand-specific learning gaps that could inform the development of targeted instructional interventions. A descriptive research design was employed, utilizing a validated 30-item achievement test aligned with Bloom’s Taxonomy to assess students’ conceptual understanding across selected chemistry competencies. The results revealed a statistically significant difference in performance across academic strands. ABM students demonstrated the highest level of proficiency, attaining a Mean Percentage Score (MPS) of 78.73%, which corresponds to the “Moving Towards Mastery” classification. In contrast, ICT and HUMSS students obtained lower MPS values of 59.80% and 55.15%, respectively, both categorized under the “Average” mastery level. Across content domains, students performed more strongly in contextualized and macroscopic topics, such as star formation (79.01%) and the identification of active ingredients in household cleaning products (76.54%). However, substantial difficulties were observed in abstract and theory-intensive concepts. Notably, the synthesis of new elements based on atomic number yielded a low mastery level of 28.40%. These findings highlight persistent conceptual gaps in chemistry learning, particularly among non-STEM academic strands, and underscore the limitations of uniform instructional approaches. The study emphasizes the need for strand-responsive and differentiated instructional strategies, supported by contextualized learning materials and visual representations, to enhance students’ understanding of abstract chemical principles and reduce performance disparities within the senior high school chemistry curriculum.

Academic Strands, Chemistry Competencies, Mastery Level, Physical Science

1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Antiojo, L. P. (2017). Comparison of students' perceived mastery and teachers' perceived competencies in different concepts in general chemistry. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 4(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0402012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chi, S. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Fact sheet on Philippines’ performance in science, mathematics, and reading. Department of Education / Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. CPD Singapore. (2024). The importance of chemistry education: Building scientific literacy. https://cpdsingapore.com/the-importance-of-chemistry-education-building-scientific-literacy/cpdsingapore [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. De La Fuente, J. K. (2022, August 9). Overview of student learning outcome assessments in the Philippines. TeacherPH. https://www.teacherph.com/student-learning-outcome-assessments-philippines/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 51, s. 2015: Senior High School tracks and strands. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/DO_s2015_51_0.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 science curriculum guide. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Science-CG_with-tagged-sci-equipment_revised.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dita, B. V., & Velasco, M. J. M. (2025). The relationship of Senior High School strands and academic performance in college among Computer Engineering students: Basis for policy guideline development. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14631683 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Farillon, L. M. F. (2022). Scientific reasoning, critical thinking, and academic performance in science of SHS students across strands. UTAMAX: Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 23(1), 1–12. https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/UTAMAX/article/view/8284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mangubat, F. M. (2023). Anecdotes of university students in learning chemistry: A Philippine context. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.42120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mangubat, F. M., & Picardal, M. T. (2023). Predictors of chemistry learning among first year university students. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1622a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Orbe, J. R., Espinosa, A. A., & Datukan, J. T. (2018). Teaching chemistry in a spiral progression approach: Lessons from science teachers in the Philippines. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n4.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Taglorin, H. L. L., Nabua, E. B., Latonio, B. C., & Bolocon, A., Jr. (2025). Least mastered competencies in Grade 10 chemistry and their motivation levels: A basis for pedagogical intervention. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(2), 1008–1021. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.902078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Torres, R. D., & Calim, K. C. (2024). Green chemistry: Approach to improve the performance of Grade 11 STEM students in chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), 9(9), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2024.909032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study