Technological Fluency as a Catalyst for Chemistry Content Mastery in STEM Education

This study examined the relationship between chemistry content proficiency and technological fluency among 50 Senior High School (SHS) STEM learners at Sulangon National High School. Employing a descriptive–correlational research design with purposive sampling, the study assessed learners’ mastery of identified least mastered competencies in Gas Laws and their technological proficiency in software applications, web navigation, and online security. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient. Results revealed a mean content knowledge score of 16.95, corresponding to the Novice proficiency level (56.5% mastery), and a mean technological proficiency score of 3.00. Correlation analysis yielded a statistically significant moderate positive relationship between the variables (r = 0.589, p = 0.000006), leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. The findings indicate that chemistry content proficiency and technological fluency are mutually reinforcing: a strong conceptual foundation supports effective technology use, while increased technological fluency enhances content mastery. This synergy suggests that technology may function as a cognitive catalyst, facilitating deeper conceptual understanding of abstract STEM concepts. The study recommends the systematic integration of digital tools into chemistry instruction and the prioritization of digital infrastructure to support the reciprocal development of learners’ academic and technological competencies.

chemistry proficiency, Senior High School STEM learners, technological fluency

1. Ariftani, D., et al. (2025). Integrating chemistry, information technology, and entrepreneurship through project-based learning. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 5(1), 52-60. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Azzahra, S. F. (2025). Academic achievement and digital literacy: A correlational study of learners in Universitas Kristen Indonesia. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 23(8), 322-331. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2025/v23i8770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baterna, J., Mina, S., & Rogayan, D. V. (2020). Digital literacy and self-efficacy of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) strand learners. Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(iv-i).14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, X., et al. (2022). Intelligent tutoring systems and student autonomy in science education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 14(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. European Commission. (2022). Digital competence framework for citizens (DigComp 2.2). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hillmayr, D., et al. (2020). Using digital media to enhance learning in STEM subjects: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 29, 100308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Livingstone, S., et al. (2021). Digital skills: A conceptual framework. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211043187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lo, C., et al. (2025). Digital literacy and academic performance: The mediating roles of digital informal learning and self-efficacy. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1590274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mangubat, J. (2023). Development and validation of a computer simulation-based laboratory manual for gas laws. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.51229/cjms.v5i1.102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mehrvarz, M., et al. (2021). The determinant role of digital informal learning in academic performance. Computers & Education, 166, 104162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nisa, H., et al. (2024). Learners' digital literacy on chemistry–STEAM project-based learning: A gender perspective. Edu Sains, 12(2), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.18.6.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rahmawati, R. (2024). Learners' conceptual understanding in chemistry learning using PhET interactive simulations. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1597 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rubab, U. E., et al. (2025). Awareness of cybersecurity measures and learners' academic performance. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(S7). https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM32.S7.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sormin, E. (2025). Exploring the relationship between learners' digital literacy and analytical skills in chemistry education. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(9), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i92342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Taglorin, H. L. L., et al. (2025). Least mastered competencies in Grade 10 Chemistry and their motivation levels. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Torres, J., & Calim, L. (2024). Mastery and confidence level of Grade 11 STEM learners in General Chemistry. IJRISS, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.80201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54676/ASZJ9193 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wieman, C., Adams, W., & Perkins, K. (2021). PhET: Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics and chemistry. Science, 322(5902), 682-683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161948 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. World Bank. (2022). Remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Policy lessons. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/37191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study