IJRISS Logo

A Systematic Literature Review on the Flipped Formative Assessment Practices in Higher Education

Authors

Mahalecumy NarayananSamy

School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang (Malaysia)

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Azidah Abu Ziden

School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200295

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 3793-3803

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-29

Accepted: 2026-01-04

Published: 2026-01-16

Abstract

A flipped classroom, also known as an inverted classroom, has garnered significant attention from educational researchers and educators. In this instructional approach, traditional lecture content is delivered outside the classroom, while in-class time is dedicated to interactive and student-centered learning activities. However, despite its advantages, numerous studies have highlighted the challenges associated with the implementation of flipped classrooms. The mixed findings from past research motivated this study to conduct a systematic literature review on assessment practices in higher education. This study conducts a systematic literature review focusing specifically on formative assessment practices in flipped classrooms at the tertiary level. The review aims to examine (i) current formative assessment practices, (ii) the types of formative assessment employed, and (iii) the tools used to support formative assessment in flipped classroom settings. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol to ensure methodological rigor and transparency. Relevant studies were identified through comprehensive searches of major academic databases, including Web of Science and Scopus. In this process, a total of 471 articles were selected and 13 articles were identified adhering to the inclusion criteria. The findings of this study guide educators, researchers, and stakeholders in effectively implementing assessment practices in the flipped classroom at higher institutions.

Keywords

Formative Assessment in FC, Innovative Assessment in FC, E-assessment in FC, Assessment and Feedback Practices in FC

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. H. Polat and H. Kayaduman, “An Emerging Trend in Online Instruction: E-Flipped Classroom,” in Advances in Mobile and Distance Learning, G. Durak and S. Çankaya, Eds., IGI Global, 2021, pp. 159–177. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8701-0.ch008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Doucet, Armand and Netolicky, Deborah and Timmers, Koen and Tuscano, Francis Jim, “Thinking about pedagogy in an unfolding pandemic: An independent report on approaches to distance learning during COVID19 school closures”. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. C. Stöhr, C. Demazière, and T. Adawi, “The polarizing effect of the online flipped classroom,” Computers & Education, vol. 147, p. 103789, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. J. Bergmann and A. Sams, Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day, 1st ed. Eugene, Or Alexandria, Va: International Society for Technology in Education, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. G. Akçayır and M. Akçayır, “The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges,” Computers & Education, vol. 126, pp. 334–345, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. C. F. Goh and E. T. Ong, “Flipped classroom as an effective approach in enhancing student learning of a pharmacy course with a historically low student pass rate,” Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 621–629, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.02.025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. S. R. Simonson, B. Earl, and M. Frary, “Establishing a Framework for Assessing Teaching Effectiveness,” College Teaching, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 164–180, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1080/87567555.2021.1909528. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. H. Al-Samarraie, A. Shamsuddin, and A. I. Alzahrani, “A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines,” Education Tech Research Dev, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1017–1051, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09718-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. A. M. Al‐Zahrani, “From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students’ creative thinking,” Brit J Educational Tech, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1133–1148, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12353. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hüseyin Ateş, “Designing a self-regulated flipped learning approach to promote students’ science learning performance,” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 27, no. 1, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.30191/ETS.202401_27(1).RP05. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. I. T. Awidi and M. Paynter, “The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience,” Computers & Education, vol. 128, pp. 269–283, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. K. Ay and G. Dağhan, “The effect of the flipped learning approach designed with community of inquiry model to the development of students’ critical thinking strategies and social, teaching and cognitive presences,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 15267–15299, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11809-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. C. Barahona, M. Nussbaum, P. Espinosa, A. Meneses, C. Alario-Hoyos, and M. Pérez-Sanagustín, “Transforming the learning experience in pre-service teacher training using the flipped classroom,” Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 261–274, May 2022, doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2022.2041476. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. M. Cevikbas and G. Kaiser, “Flipped classroom as a reform-oriented approach to teaching mathematics,” ZDM Mathematics Education, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1291–1305, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11858-020-01191-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. A. I. Challob, “The effect of flipped learning on EFL students’ writing performance, autonomy, and motivation,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 3743–3769, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10434-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. C.-Y. Chang, P. Panjaburee, H.-C. Lin, C.-L. Lai, and G.-H. Hwang, “Effects of online strategies on students’ learning performance, self-efficacy, self-regulation and critical thinking in university online courses,” Education Tech Research Dev, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 185–204, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11423-021-10071-y. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Abdullah, “University Courses Subjects (MPU) Accessibility Via Online for Distance Learning (DL) During Movement Control Order (MCO) in Malaysia.,” RIGEO – Volume 11, Issue 7 (2021), vol. Vol. 11 No. 7 (2021): Vol. 11 No. 7 (2021), [Online]. Available: https://rigeo.org/view-artical/?s_id=1979 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. G. Rodríguez, J. Díez, N. Pérez, J. E. Baños, and M. Carrió, “Flipped classroom: Fostering creative skills in undergraduate students of health sciences,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 33, p. 100575, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100575. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. B. Aidoo, V.-M. Vesterinen, M. A. Macdonald, B. Gísladóttir, and S. Pétursdóttir, “Perceptions of Ghanaian Student Teachers on Benefits and Challenges of the Flipped Classroom: A Case Study,” CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, vol. 14, no. 4, p. ep377, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/12163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. C. K. Lo and K. F. Hew, “Student Engagement in Mathematics Flipped Classrooms: Implications of Journal Publications From 2011 to 2020,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, p. 672610, May 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. C. K. Lo, K. F. Hew, and G. Chen, “Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education,” Educational Research Review, vol. 22, pp. 50–73, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. H. Rawas, N. Bano, and S. Alaidarous, “Comparing the Effects of Individual Versus Group Face-to-Face Class Activities in Flipped Classroom on Student’s Test Performances,” Health Professions Education, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 153–161, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.hpe.2019.06.002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. K. Schildkamp, F. M. Van Der Kleij, M. C. Heitink, W. B. Kippers, and B. P. Veldkamp, “Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 103, p. 101602, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. E. Sointu, M. Hyypiä, M. C. Lambert, L. Hirsto, M. Saarelainen, and T. Valtonen, “Preliminary evidence of key factors in successful flipping: predicting positive student experiences in flipped classrooms,” High Educ, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 503–520, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00848-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. J. A. Wilson, R. C. Waghel, and M. M. Dinkins, “Flipped classroom versus a didactic method with active learning in a modified team-based learning self-care pharmacotherapy course,” Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1287–1295, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.09.017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. E. O. Sen, “THEMATIC ANALYSIS OF ARTICLES ON FLIPPED LEARNING IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION,” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 202–222, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1096444. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. F. H. Wang, “An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system,” Computers & Education, vol. 114, pp. 79–91, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nhat, N, “A case study of the flipped classroom approach for translation studies in Vietnam,” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nottingham, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/386736312.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nguyen, Quang Nhat, “A case study of the flipped classroom approach for translation studies in Vietnam,” University of Nottingham, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. {Amir, Marina Binti Mohamad}, “Implementation of Flipped ESL Classroom at Two Private Tertiary Education Institutions,” University of Malaya, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. C. Gopalan, G. Bracey, M. Klann, and C. Schmidt, “Embracing the flipped classroom: the planning and execution of a faculty workshop,” Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 648–654, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1152/advan.00012.2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Jaeho Jeon and Seongyong Lee, “The impact of a chatbot-assisted flipped approach on EFL learner interaction,” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 27, no. 4, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.30191/ETS.202410_27(4).RP12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. W.-Y. Hwang, T.-H. Wu, and R. Shadiev, “Applications of Reciprocal Teaching in Flipped Classroom to Facilitate High Level of Cognition for Sustainable Learning Practices,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 5848, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15075848. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Fung, Chak Him, “How does flipped classroom foster STEM education: Cases studies of two innovative teaching and learning approaches?,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.lib.eduhk.hk/pure-data/pub/202404004.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and for the PRISMA Group, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” BMJ, vol. 339, no. jul21 1, pp. b2535–b2535, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. D. M. Howard et al., “Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions,” Nat Neurosci, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 343–352, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0326-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. M. Gusenbauer and N. R. Haddaway, “What every researcher should know about searching – clarified concepts, search advice, and an agenda to improve finding in academia,” Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 136–147, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1457. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. J. P. Higgins and S. Green, Eds., Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series, 1st ed. Wiley, 2008. doi: 10.1002/9780470712184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. H. Abd Halim, M. I. Hamzah, and H. Zulkifli, “A systematic review on the formative assessment practice in teaching and learning in secondary school,” IJERE, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 1173, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v13i2.26187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. M. C. Ruiz-Jiménez, R. Martínez-Jiménez, A. Licerán-Gutiérrez, and E. García-Martí, “Students’ attitude: Key to understanding the improvement of their academic RESULTS in a flipped classroom environment,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 100635, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100635. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. A.-B. Pérez-Torregrosa, M.-J. Gallego-Arrufat, and M. Cebrián-de-la-Serna, “Digital rubric-based assessment of oral presentation competence with technological resources for preservice teachers,” Estudios sobre Educación, vol. 43, pp. 177–198, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.15581/004.43.009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. K. Antonis, P. Lampsas, I. Katsenos, S. Papadakis, and S.-M. Stamouli, “Flipped classroom with teams-based learning in emergency higher education: methodology and results,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 5279–5295, May 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11339-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. H.-W. Huang, D. J. Mills, and J. A. N. Z. Tiangco, “Inquiry-Based Learning and Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment in Flipped EFL Writing Instruction: Student Performance and Perceptions,” Sage Open, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 21582440241236663, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241236663. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. N. Nakagawa, “Comparison of teaching methods: Formative assessment in traditional didactic lectures and learning monitoring system-based lectures,” Pharm Educ, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 66–75, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.46542/pe.2025.251.6675. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. J. C. Mosquera Feijóo, F. Suárez, I. Chiyón, and M. G. Alberti, “Some Web-Based Experiences from Flipped Classroom Techniques in AEC Modules during the COVID-19 Lockdown,” Education Sciences, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 211, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11050211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. A. P. Duffy, A. Henshaw, and J. A. Trovato, “Use of active learning and simulation to teach pharmacy students order verification and patient education best practices with oral oncolytic therapies,” J Oncol Pharm Pract, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 834–841, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1078155220940395. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. L. C. Podraza, L. S. Starnes, J. R. Starnes, A. Patel, and R. K. P. Apple, “A Novel Pediatric Clinical Skills Curriculum to Prepare Medical Students for Pediatrics Clerkship,” Med.Sci.Educ., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 343–350, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02191-w. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. K. Grishikashvili, “Making Teaching and Learning a Collaborative Process by Adopting Research Informed Teaching on Executive Education Programmes,” ICER, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 61–67, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.34190/icer.1.1.3154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. O. Buinytska, L. Varchenko-Trotsenko, T. Terletska, and A. Tiutiunnyk, “Utilization of E-Learning System for Innovative Methods Implementation in Humanities Pedagogy,” in Digital Humanities Workshop, Kyiv Ukraine: ACM, Dec. 2021, pp. 132–140. doi: 10.1145/3526242.3526262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. K. Grishikashvili, “Effects of Action Learning Strategies and Reflection in Teaching Business Research Methods in Business and Management Education,” ecrm, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 108–114, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.34190/ecrm.23.1.2330. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. L. Madariaga, M. Nussbaum, I. Gutiérrez, C. Barahona, and A. Meneses, “Assessment of user experience in video-based learning environments: From design guidelines to final product,” Computers & Education, vol. 167, p. 104176, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. F. H. Wang, “Interpreting log data through the lens of learning design: Second-order predictors and their relations with learning outcomes in flipped classrooms,” Computers & Education, vol. 168, p. 104209, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104209. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles