Territorial Integrity and Sovereignty: India’s Response to the Ukraine Crisis Considering Its Own Border Disputes

India’s position toward the Ukraine conflict —which began in February 2022—is analyzed using both the theories of Realism and Constructivism through the lens of India's own territorial disputes —such as the dispute with China at the LAC (Line of Actual Control) and with Pakistan regarding Kashmir. This study evaluates India's diplomatic neutrality —its abstention from UN condemnation of Russia while promoting dialogue to resolve crises —as an indication of the lessons learned from its own border disputes which have led it to emphasize the resolution of disputes peacefully so that no precedent is set that may undermine its claims to territorial sovereignty. The key finding of this research demonstrates that India has maintained an equilibrium between supporting sovereignty in principle and forming pragmatic alliances to leverage the crisis to improve relations with Russia —in the context of Sino-Indian tensions. However, this posture also creates perceptions of inconsistency —because Western criticisms of Russian actions in Ukraine have raised concerns about parallels between these actions and those of China in Ladakh.
This research argues that India’s response contributes to its ability to maintain a multipolar position, and to the broader debate about how internal disputes influence foreign policy in the contexts of the Global South. The implications of this research include continued calls for reform of multilateral institutions to provide equitable treatment for the issues of sovereignty. This research also illustrates the relationship between self-interest and international norms in responding to crises.

Territorial Integrity, Sovereignty Principles

1. Ciorciari, J. D. (2009). What Kind of Great Power Will India Be? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2269299 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Forough, M., Dahbi, K., Waterman, A., & Woertz, E. (2023). Narratives of Global Order and Re-Ordering from the Global South. Antíteses, 16(31), 292. https://doi.org/10.5433/1984-3356.2023v16n31p292-325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ginsburg, T. (2022). Article 2(4) and Authoritarian International Law. AJIL Unbound, 116, 130. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2022.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Iqbal, B. A., & Rahman, M. N. (2023). BRICS and India in the Light of Russia-Ukraine Crisis: Emerging Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 16(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.14330/jeail.2023.16.1.09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kulik, L. (2023). Russia-India Economic Cooperation: Current Trends and Promising Directions. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 16(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-2-89-159-175 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Leandro, F. J., & Oberoi, R. (2023). Ukraine Geopolitical European Flashpoints vis-à-vis India and China: From Ambivalence to Strategic Engagement. JANUS NET E-Journal of International Relation. https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.dt0123.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Morales, P. C. (2025). India’s foreign policy reconfiguration: from non-alignment to multi-alignment. Notes Internacionals CIDOB, 324, 1. https://doi.org/10.24241/notesint.2025/324/en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Muraviev, A., Ahlawat, D., & Hughes, L. (2021). India’s security dilemma: engaging big powers while retaining strategic autonomy. International Politics, 59(6), 1119. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-02100350-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Oberoi, R., & Leandro, F. J. (2023). Ukraine effect: are we groping for a new world order? JANUS NET E-Journal of International Relation, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.14.2.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Pekkanen, S., Ravenhill, J., Foot, R., & Ganguly, Š. (2014). India’s Foreign and Security Policies. In [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Oxford University Press eBooks. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199916245.013.0021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Press, U. (2022). Parameters Winter Issue 2022-23. The US Army War College Quarterly Parameters, 52(4). https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.3181 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Raghav, K. (2024). India’s Foreign Policy toward China (2019 to 2024). International Journal for [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(5), 4778. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.60703 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rajagopalan, R. (2023). Faraway War: Effects of the Ukraine War on South Asian Security Thinking. Asia Policy, 18(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.0019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sasikumar, K. (2016). Branding India: Constructing a reputation for responsibility in the nuclear order. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 13(3), 242. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-016-0038-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Singh, M., & Pandey, N. D. (2025). India’s foreign policy: From Nehru to Modi: A journey of diplomacy and transformation. International Journal of Political Science and Governance, 7(3), 98. https://doi.org/10.33545/26646021.2025.v7.i3b.468 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Suporn, T., Bunyavejchewin, P., Faugchun, P., & Sukthungthong, N. (2021). The Cold War, Old and New: A Preliminary Comparative Study of Polarity, Polarisation, and Elements of (In)stability. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.2.09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Szumowski, A. R. (2016). New Dynamics of Power Transfers – the Ukrainian Crisis 2013–2014. In Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooks. University of Lodz Press. https://doi.org/10.18778/8088153-2.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Uzunçayır, C. (2024). Take Back Control: Explaining the Rise of Populist Sovereigntism Through the Legitimacy Crisis of the Liberal International Order. DergiPark (Istanbul University). https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1560384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Verma, R. (2023). Multi-alignment and India’s response to the Russia–Ukraine war. International Politics, 61(5), 954. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00480-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Verma, R. (2024). Russia–Ukraine war and India’s quest for leading power status. Global Policy, 15(4), 778. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13365 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Williams, C., & Papa, M. (2020). Rethinking “Alliances”: The Case of South Africa as a Rising Power. African Security, 13(4), 325. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2020.1871796 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Yadav, V. (2023). India in 2022. Asian Survey, 63(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2023.63.2.199 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study