Evaluating the Usability of the 3Fs Flipped Model to Enhance Student Engagement: A Case Study at INTI International College Penang

Authors

Mahalecumy NarayananSamy

School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang (Malaysia)

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Azidah Abu Ziden

School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang (Malaysia)

Krishnamoorthy Kumarasamy

INTI International College, 1-Z, Lebuh Bukit Jambul, 11900 Bayan Lepas, Penang (Malaysia)

Dr. Gowri Selvam

INTI International College, 1-Z, Lebuh Bukit Jambul, 11900 Bayan Lepas, Penang (Malaysia)

Sharuvindan Nair Rajendran

INTI International College, 1-Z, Lebuh Bukit Jambul, 11900 Bayan Lepas, Penang (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100034

Subject Category: Educational Technology

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 391-396

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-27

Accepted: 2026-01-01

Published: 2026-01-19

Abstract

This study investigates the usability of the 3Fs Flipped Model (Flipped, Formative, and Feedback) in promoting student engagement at INTI International College Penang. Grounded in digital pedagogy and instructional design, the model integrates pre-class content delivery, ongoing formative assessment, and timely feedback to support active, student-centered learning. The novelty of this study lies in its structured integration of the 3Fs model with digital tools such as asynchronous video lectures, interactive Google Forms, Padlet discussions, and real-time quizzes using Quizizz and Mentimeter across each phase of learning to enhance engagement and self-directed learning. A quantitative approach was employed, involving 151 students from four academic programmes: General Studies, Information Technology, Business Studies, and Physics. Data were collected using Google Forms to explore students’ experiences and perceptions of the model. The study specifically examined engagement levels before and during class sessions. Results indicated strong positive associations between structured formative activities and students’ reported preparedness for class. In-class engagement also improved, with timely feedback contributing significantly to motivation and self-reflection. Overall, students reported positive engagement experiences across disciplines when formative assessment and feedback were systematically integrated. The findings are limited to the current context but suggest possible relevance to similar higher education settings and further studies employing experimental or longitudinal methods are recommended.

Keywords

Flipped Classroom, Instructional Design, Student Engagement

Downloads

References

1. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: Internal Society for Technology in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied psychological measurement, 12(4), 425-434 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fructuoso, I. N., Albó, L., & Beardsley, M. (2022). University students’ preference for flexible teaching models that foster constructivist learning practices. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 22-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Goh, C. F., & Ong, E. T. (2019). Flipped classroom as an effective approach in enhancing student learning of a pharmacy course with a historically low student pass rate. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(6), 621-629. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Huang, Y. M., Silitonga, L. M., & Wu, T. T. (2022). Applying a business simulation game in a flipped classroom to enhance engagement, learning achievement, and higher-order thinking skills. Computers & Education, 183, 104494. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jeong, J. S., González-Gómez, D., & Cañada-Cañada, F. (2021). How does a flipped classroom course affect the affective domain toward science course?. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(5), 707-719. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jia, C., Hew, K. F., Jiahui, D., & Liuyufeng, L. (2023). Towards a fully online flipped classroom model to support student learning outcomes and engagement: A 2-year design-based study. The Internet and Higher Education, 56, 100878. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lee, G., & Wallace, A. (2018). Flipped learning in the English as a foreign language classroom: Outcomes and perceptions. TESOL quarterly, 52(1), 62-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100394. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Munir, Q., Abdulkareem, M., Horttanainen, M., & Kärki, T. (2023). A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete produced from industrial side streams in comparison with traditional concrete. Science of The Total Environment, 865, 161230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ng, E. K. L. (2023). Student engagement in flipped classroom in nursing education: An integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice, 103585. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. O’Donovan, B., Rust, C., & Price, M. (2016). A scholarly approach to solving the feedback dilemma in practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 938-949. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Othman, S. A., Kamarudin, Y., Sivarajan, S., Soh, E. X., Lau, M. N., Zakaria, N. N., ... & Naimie, Z. (2023). Students' perception on flipped classroom with formative assessment: A focus group study. European journal of dental education, 27(3), 419-427. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Polat, H., & Karabatak, S. (2021). Effect of flipped classroom model on academic achievement, academic satisfaction and general belongingness. Learning Environments Research, 1-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rawas, H., Bano, N., & Alaidarous, S. (2020). Comparing the effects of individual versus group face-to-face class activities in flipped classroom on student's test performances. Health Professions Education, 6(2), 153-161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ruiz-Jimenez, M. C., Martinez-Jimenez, R., Liceran-Gutierrez, A., & Garcia-Marti, E. (2022). Students’ attitude: Key to understanding the improvement of their academic RESULTS in a flipped classroom environment. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), 100635. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sointu, E., Hyypiä, M., Lambert, M. C., Hirsto, L., Saarelainen, M., & Valtonen, T. (2023). Preliminary evidence of key factors in successful flipping: predicting positive student experiences in flipped classrooms. Higher Education, 85(3), 503-520. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles