Reading Readiness and Proficiency of Grade 6 Learners: Basis for Reading and Language Development Plan

Reading readiness is the stage when a child is ready to begin learning to read. This is essential among elementary learners because it compasses the skills and experience that prepare them to engage with other related literacy skills. On the other hand, reading proficiency is the level at which a person can read and understand text. It is essential for academic success and meaningful participation in an increasingly information-driven society. The PHIL-IRI is important in identifying the level of the learner’s proficiency in reading. This study aimed to (1) assess the level of reading readiness of Grade 6 learners at the beginning of the school year (BoY) based on Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (PHIL-IRI) results; (2) evaluate the reading level proficiency of Grade 6 learners at the end of the school year (EoY) based on PHIL-IRI results; (3) assess if there is a significant difference in the reading proficiency levels of Grade 6 learners between beginning of the school year (BoY) and end of the school year (EoY) assessments; (4) evaluate the relationship between Grade 6 learners’ reading readiness at beginning of the school year (BoY) and their reading proficiency at end of the school year (EoY) (5) develop a language instructional strategy framework to improve reading. Grade 6 learners from selected public elementary in the division of occidental Mindoro schools who completed both BOY and EOY PHIL-IRI assessments within the same school year were the participants of the study. They were selected through purposive criterion sampling. A secondary data obtained from the official PHIL-IRI results of the participating schools in the beginning of the school year and end of the school year were used. Descriptive, Chi-Square Test and Spearman Rank Correlation test were used. Descriptive statistics showed that at the beginning of the school year, most of the learners fall under frustration and instructional level, while at the end of the school year, independent level increased while frustration level decreased. The study also revealed that there is a significant difference on the proficiency of the learners in the beginning of the school and at the end of the school year. A significant relationship was also noted. An instructional intervention framework was developed to guide educators how to implement targeted teaching strategies to improve the reading proficiency of the learners.

reading readiness, reading proficiency

1. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED239236.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cabardo, J. R. O. (2015). Reading proficiency level of students: Basis for reading intervention program. HNHS-Aplaya Extension High School. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2712237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Camocamo, M. C. B., & Ong, C. G. (2021). Developing a reading program for junior high school. Global Scientific Journals, 9(4) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Casingal, C. (2022). Efficacy of PHIL-IRI and remedial classes for Filipinos at the intermediate level. Journal of Sustainable Business, Economics and Finance, 1(2), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.31039/josbef.2022.1.2.22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Education (DepEd). (2018). Phil-IRI: Philippine Informal Reading Inventory Manual (2018 Edition). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Education (DepEd). (2025). Supplemental guidelines on the Bawat Bata Bumabasa and literacy remediation programs (DepEd Memorandum Nos. 033 & 034, s. 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Evangelista, Z. M., Lido, C., Swingler, M., & Bohan, J. (2022). Exploring LGBT+ campus climate in the UK and Philippines: How prejudice and belonging shape inclusion in higher education. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2801 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(6), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gowon, R. P., & Owolabi, O. V. (2020). Effects of explicit instruction on reading fluency skills of primary pupils in Jos East Local Government Area of Plateau State, Nigeria. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(5), 1573–1583. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.55.35 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Herrera, F. T., Rayton, M. P. C., Limos-Galay, J. A., & Lazaro, N. J. (2024). Learning domains affecting the reading comprehension of Grade 10 students in Magsaysay, Occidental Mindoro. International Journal of Research Studies in Management, 12(3), 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ibo, E. A., & Mangarin, R. (2023). Enhancing reading skills of Grade 6 pupils through TaTiToRe (Take Time to Read) program: An action research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nala, R. (2023). Difficulty in reading comprehension and writing among Grade Six learners: Basis for an intervention plan. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nones, J. B. V. (2025). Enhancing reading fluency in English among Grade 6 learners through Project 4P’s. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nopriani, E., & Fetriani, F. (2022). Diagnosis of English students’ reading fluency using Informal Reading Inventory. Teaching English and Language Learning English Journal, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.36085/telle.v4i1.6331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2025). Functional literacy in the MIMAROPA region: 2024 Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey (FLEMMS) (Press Release No. 2025-SR-53). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Pocaan, J. M., Bailon, L. L., & Pocaan, J. P. T. (2022). Strategic reading intervention for left-behind learners in the Philippines. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(2), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i2.5087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Vergara, P. V., et al. (2024). Teacher–student relationship as resilience strengthener in novice teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1361750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Villalva, R. D. (2023). A critical review of the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) assessment. International Journal of Research Publications, 121(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001211320234560 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study