Enhancing Upper Secondary Students’ Achievement in Sentence-Based Mathematics Problem Solving: Challenges and Instructional Strategies

Authors

Nurin Balqis Husain

Faculty of Education, UiTM (Malaysia)

Hamimah Hashim

Faculty of Education, UiTM (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100061

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 680-691

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-01

Accepted: 2026-01-07

Published: 2026-01-22

Abstract

Students’ positive perceptions of sentence-based mathematics problem solving have been shown to support better performance and overall achievement in Mathematics. However, many students continue to struggle with sentence-based problem solving, a persistent issue in the Malaysian context where limited problem-solving skills remain a major concern. Mathematics teachers also face considerable difficulties in teaching sentence-based problems, particularly in helping students to comprehend problem contexts and apply mathematical concepts to real-life situations. Therefore, this study aims to identify the challenges encountered by Mathematics teachers when teaching sentence-based problem solving and to explore the teaching strategies they employ to support students’ learning. This study adopted a mixed-methods approach and was conducted in a secondary school in Subang Jaya, Selangor. The findings are presented across three dimensions: students’ perceptions, teachers’ challenges, and the teaching strategies used in sentence-based Mathematics problem solving. A total of 175 upper secondary students (Forms 4 and 5) were selected through stratified sampling to examine students’ perceptions. Ten Mathematics teachers from the same school participated in the investigation of teaching challenges, while four teachers were interviewed to obtain qualitative insights into instructional strategies. The results indicate that upper secondary students generally hold poor perceptions of sentence-based Mathematics problem solving. The study further reveals that the primary challenges faced by teachers stem from student-related factors, particularly students’ weak mathematical foundations and limited mastery of essential mathematical skills. Several effective strategies were identified, including the use of Polya’s problem-solving steps, problem-based learning in groups, questioning techniques, contextual learning, and structured group discussions. These findings provide valuable insights into students’ perceptions and teachers’ challenges, enabling Mathematics educators to adopt more effective instructional approaches. Nevertheless, further research involving larger samples and diverse school settings is recommended to deepen understanding and refine strategies for teaching sentence-based Mathematics problem solving.

Keywords

Education

Downloads

References

1. Bell, R., Warren, V., & Schmidt, R. (2022). The Application of Concurrent or Sequential Mixed Methods Research Designs and their Methodological Implications: Investigating Tacit Knowledge, its Use, and Application in Automotive Development Author Names [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bosica, J., Pyper, J. S., & MacGregor, S. (2021). Incorporating problem-based learning in a secondary school mathematics preservice teacher education course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chirimbana, M., Nghipandulwa, L. T., & Kamati, F. N. (2022). An investigation of the factors that contribute to poor problem-solving skills in Grade 8 mathematics learners in Namibia. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 614–628. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.1012042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Daud, A. S., Adnan, N. S. M., Aziz, M. K. N. A., Embong, Z., & Adnan, N. S. M. (2020). Students’ Perception towards Mathematics using APOS Theory: A Case Study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1529(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/3/032020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gafoor, K. A., & Kurukkan, A. (2015). Learner and Teacher perception on Difficulties in Learning and Teaching Mathematics: Some Implications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ganesen, P., Osman, S., Abu, S., & Kumar, J. A. (2020). The Relationship Between Learning Styles and Achievement of Solving Algebraic Problems Among Lower Secondary School Students. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(9S), 2563–2574. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gogo, S., & Musonda, I. (2022). The Use of the Exploratory Sequential Approach in Mixed-Method Research: A Case of Contextual Top Leadership Interventions in Construction H&S. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127276 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ishak, A. H. N., Osman, S., Wei, C. K., Kurniati, D., Ismail, N., & Wilda Indra Nanna, A. (2021). Teaching Strategies for Mathematical Problem-Solving through the Lens of Secondary School Teachers. TEM Journal, 10(2), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM102-31 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ling, A. N. B., & Mahmud, M. S. (2023). Challenges of teachers when teaching sentence-based mathematics problem-solving skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Moleko, M. M., & Mosimege, M. D. (2020). Teachers’ and learners’ experiences for guiding effective teaching and learning of mathematics word problems. In Issues in Educational Research (Vol. 30, Issue 4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Molina-Azorin, J. F., Tari, J.-J., Lopez-Gamero, M. D., Pereira-Moliner, J., & Pertusa-Ortega, E. M. (2018). The Implementation and Advantages of Mixed Methods in Competitive Strategy and Management Systems. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE RESEARCH APPROACHES, 10(1), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v10n1a28 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pólya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Regnault, A., Willgoss, T., & Barbic, S. (2018). Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0043-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sanjeet Sah. (2016). Problem Faced By Teacher In Teaching Mathematics At Secondary Level. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. 3(7), 749–752. www.allresearchjournal.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Shawan, M., Osman, S., & Abu, M. S. (2021). Difficulties in Solving Non-Routine Problems: Preliminary Analysis and Results. ASM Science Journal, 16(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2021.800 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Simamora, R. E., Saragih, S., & Hasratuddin, H. (2018). Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3966 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Taley, B. I. (2022). Teacher And Student Views Of Mathematics Word Problem-Solving Task At Senior High School Level. FNAS Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 3(2), 33–43. www.fnasjournals.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wakhata, R., Mutarutinya, V., & Balimuttajjo, S. (2022). Secondary school students’ attitude towards mathematics word problems. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01449-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zaharin, F. Z., Suriya, N., Karim, A., Adenan, N. H., Wahida, N., Junus, M., Tarmizi, R. A., Zila, N., Hamid, A., & Latib, L. A. (2021). Gamification in Mathematics: Students’ Perceptions in Learning Perimeter and Area. 11. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.sp.7.2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles