Green Transformational Leadership and Digital Innovation Capability: The Moderating Role of Change Acceptance in Tunisian Public Administration

This research investigates the moderating effect of acceptance of change on the relationship between green transformational leadership and digital innovation capability in the Tunisian public administration. In the context of accelerating digital transformation and sustainability changes, the study examines how leadership styles and employee attitudes influence digital innovation capability in the public sector. Employing a mixed-methods approach that combines quantitative data from 280 Ministry of Higher Education and Research employees with qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with regional delegates, the findings confirm that green transformational leadership positively impacts digital innovation capability. Moreover, acceptance of change strengthens this relationship and further enhances digital innovation capability. The results underscore the vital interplay between visionary, sustainable leadership and a receptive organizational culture in driving successful digital and ecological transformation. This study addresses a gap in public administration research and provides valuable insights for policymakers and managers seeking to accelerate sustainable digital innovation in the Tunisian context.

Acceptance of change, green transformational leadership, digital innovation capability

1. Achmada, A. Y., Hermanto, B., & Tresna, P. W. (2024). Initiating green innovation: The role of green transformational leadership in corporate sustainability. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi, 21(1), 105–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adawiyah, I., & Sopiah, S. (2023). Transformational leadership and employee performance: Systematic literature review. Transformasi: Journal of Economics and Business Management, 2(4), 202–214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Afsar, B., Badir, Y., & Bin Saeed, B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2142–2151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aggarwal, P., & Agarwala, T. (2023). Relationship of green human resource management with environmental performance: Mediating effect of green organizational culture. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(7), 2351–2376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ahmad, S., Khan, M., & Ahmed, F. (2022). Green transformational leadership and eco innovation in organizations: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129755. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Al Ali, A. A., Singh, S. K., Al Nahyan, M., & Sohal, A. S. (2017). Change management through leadership: The mediating role of organizational culture. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(4), 723–739. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Al Ayed, S. (2024). Green innovation influenced by employee innovative work behavior via moderating role of innovative leaderships. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Albadarneh, A. M., Daradkah, A. M., Telfah, E. A., AlKhatib, F. Y., Mahmoud, A. M., Altaha’at, E. S., & Ali Ali, S. (2024). Green transformational leadership as an approach to achieving sustainable environmental development in Arab universities. Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences, 22(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Al Saidi, M., Ellermann, A. K., Fittkow, M. F., Perillieux, T. R., Saadaoui, I., & Ben Hamadou, R. (2024). The perils of building big: Desalination sustainability and brine regulation in the Arab Gulf countries. Water Resources and Industry, 32, 100259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Andersson, A., Skantz Åberg, E., Lantz Lundin, M., & Williams, P. (2022). Teachers’ professional digital competence: An overview of conceptualisations in the literature. Cogent Education, 9(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681–703. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Atobishi, T., Abu Bakir, S. M., & Nosratabadi, S. S. (2024). How do digital capabilities affect organizational performance in the public sector? The mediating role of organizational agility. Administrative Sciences, 14(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Third edition manual and sampler set. Mind Garden, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Bentaleb, D. (2024). Dynamics of leadership, interpersonal relations and commitment to change in the Tunisian healthcare context: Toward effective transformation of healthcare institutions? Journal of Management Development, 43(4), 514–532. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Blanc, E. (2016). L’impact de la digitalisation des organisations sur le rapport au travail : Entre aliénation et émancipation. Questions de Management, 2(143), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Bouaziz, F. (2020). From e government to digital government: The public value quest in the Tunisian public administration. In Digital transformation and public services (pp. 107–127). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Boussaidi, A., & Korbi, K. (2025). The role of transformational leadership in promoting digital transformation through employee engagement in public administration. International Journal of Public Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-08-2024-0091 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2003). Understanding public management and governance. Public Management Review, 5(1), 65–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Brockmeyer, A., Khatrouch, M., & Raballand, G. (2015). Public sector size and performance management: A case study of post revolution Tunisia (Policy Research Working Paper 7159). World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Casimir, S., Leturcq, F., & Bancal, M. (2025). La formation au cœur de la transformation digitale du secteur public. Archimag, 384(4), 18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Chaire EPPP – Économie des Partenariats Public Privé. (2022). [Rapport ou document : compléter le titre exact et l’éditeur le cas échéant]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Chang, C. H., Chen, Y. S., & Tseng, C. W. (2025). Digital transformation anxiety: Absorptive capacity, dynamic capability, and digital innovation performance. Management Decision, 63(3), 734–755. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Chen, H., et al. (2023). Boundary of ecosystem services: Guiding future development and application of the ecosystem service concepts. Journal of Environmental Management, 344, 118752. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Di Fabio, A., & Gori, A. (2016). Developing a new instrument for assessing acceptance of change. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 802. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ding, X., Lin, Y., & Zhang, H. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and digital green innovation: The mediating role of technological opportunity recognition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. El Mahi, R., & Slaoui, S. (2023). Le leadership transformationnel et la performance organisationnelle des entreprises : Un essai d’analyse. Revue du contrôle, de la comptabilité et de l’audit, 7(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 168–176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Fishman, J., Lushin, V., & Mandell, D. S. (2020). Predicting implementation: Comparing validated measures of intention and assessing the role of motivation when designing behavioral interventions. Implementation Science Communications, 1(1), 81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Fuentes, G. M. (2011). La transición democrática post benalista: Procedimiento y alcance del cambio político en Túnez. Política y Sociedad, 48(1), 135–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Gardner, B., Rebar, A. L., & Lally, P. (2020). Habit interventions. In M. S. Hagger, L. D. Cameron, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen, & T. Lintunen (Eds.), The handbook of behavior change (pp. 599–616). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Gruman, J. A. (2023). Leadership styles and employee adoption of green digital innovation: Promoting sustainable workplace behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Hair, J. F., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Harisinta, T. (2023). Green transformational leadership in improving green work behaviour of employee, with green organizational citizenship behaviour as mediation. International Journal of Review Management, Business and Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 10–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2023). Digitally induced change in public sector: A systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1151–1178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 20, pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 812–828. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2019). The technology fallacy: How people are the real key to digital transformation. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Kura, K. M. (2016). Linking environmentally specific transformational leadership and environmental concern to green behaviour at work. Global Business Review, 17(1S), 1S–14S. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Kroh, J., Globocnik, D., Schultz, C., Holdhof, F., & Salomo, S. (2024). Micro-foundations of digital innovation capability: A mixed method approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 122911. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Lahlimi, N., Karim, K., & Wahbi, A. (2023). La transformation digitale des organisations publiques : Approches théoriques et horizons innovants. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 4(6-1), 817–833. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Lee, W. R., Choi, S. B., & Kang, S. W. (2021). How leaders’ positive feedback influences employees’ innovative behavior: The mediating role of voice behavior and job autonomy. Sustainability, 13(4), 1901. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Lindquist, E. A. (2022). The digital era and public sector reforms: Transformation or new tools for competing values? Canadian Public Administration, 65(3), 547–568. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Lines, R. (2004). Influence of participation in strategic change: Resistance, organizational commitment and change goal achievement. Journal of Change Management, 4(3), 193–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Liu, X., & Yu, X. (2023). Green transformational leadership and employee organizational citizenship behavior for the environment in the manufacturing industry. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1097655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1097655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Madan, R., & Ashok, M. (2023). AI adoption and diffusion in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101774. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Marchiori, D. M., Rodrigues, R., Mainardes, E. W., & Popadiuk, S. (2023). The role of IT capabilities, IT reconfiguration capability and innovativeness on organizational performance: Evidence from the Brazilian public sector. Revista de Administração Pública, 57(2), 329–349. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Martins, C. de S. F., & Alves, L. (2024). Digital transformation in public management: The case of Fiocruz from the perspective of its workers. Concilium, 24(20), 274–290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Mashuri, S., Sarib, M., Rasak, A., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 12(1), 22–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Melchor, H. (2008). La gestion du changement dans l’administration des pays de l’OCDE : Un premier aperçu général (Documents de travail sur la gouvernance publique, No. 12). OCDE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Miller, M., & Ghaffarzadegan, N. (2025). Dynamic capabilities in the public sector: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 38(1), 45–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Mittal, S., & Dhar, R. L. (2016). Effect of green transformational leadership on green creativity: A study of tourist hotels. Tourism Management, 57, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Mkrtchyan, T., & Melkumyan, N. (2023). The foundations of digital transformation of the public administration system. Aylěntrank, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Motamedi, M., Mira da Silva, M., & Amaral, M. (2024). Organizational capabilities for digital innovation: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management. Advance online publication. https://www.emerald.com/insight/1460-1060.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Mu, R., & Wang, H. (2022). A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: Comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation. Public Management Review, 24(2), 135–161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Mukhtar, A., Mahmood, S., Naeem, M., & Khan, K. I. (2025). I feel green with my leader: When and how green transformational leadership influences employees’ green behavior. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. Advance online publication. https://www.emerald.com/insight/2514-9369.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Nasri, W. (2019). Determinants of e-government acceptance in Tunisia. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Noe, R. A. (2008). Employee training and development (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680–693. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(4), 461–524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Pichlak, M. (2021). Transformational leadership for green innovation: Creating sustainable workplaces. Sustainability, 13(14), 7654. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Pupion, P.-C. (2018). L’innovation dans le secteur public. Gestion et Management Public, 6(4), 6–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Pupion, P.-B. (2018). Public sector innovation capabilities: PLS-SEM evidence from emerging economies. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 456–468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Raipa, A. (2013). Organizacijų pasirengimo pokyčių valdymui dekompozicija. Public Policy and Administration, 12(4), 523–539. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. RAQMYAT Project. (2024). RAQMYAT, a springboard to the digitalization of doctoral education in Tunisia. Erasmus+ Programme. https://www.raqmyatproject.eu/en/raqmyat-a-springboard-to-the-digitalization-of-doctoral-education-in-tunisia/7493/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Ratchford, M., & Ratchford, B. T. (2021). A cross-category analysis of dispositional drivers of technology adoption. Journal of Business Research, 127, 300–311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2017). Toward a new measure of organizational environmental citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Research, 75, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employee pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 176–194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Rumijati, A., & Novianti, K. R. (2024). The development of green transformational leadership: A bibliometric analysis. MEC-J (Management and Economics Journal), 8(2), 133–144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Rym, B., Olfa, B., & Mélika, B. M. (2013). Determinants of e-learning acceptance: An empirical study in the Tunisian context. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3(3), 307–321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Saleem, F., Matelou, S., & Malik, M. I. (2024). How green transformational leaders trigger environmental performance? Unleashing the missing links through green self-efficacy, green empowerment, and green training of employees. Sustainability, 16(22), 9982. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Sangadji, E., & Islami, M. I. (2024). Effect of green transformational leadership on organizational environmental performance: The role of green human resource management practices (Study on SMEs in the embroidery sector). International Journal of Economics & Management, 18(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Santos, L. G. de M. (2024). Dynamic capabilities in the public sector: Research agenda in the context of digital transformation. JeDEM: eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 16(2), 74–87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Saoudi, L., Aubry, M., Gomot, T., & Renaud, A. (2023). Transformation digitale et performance des PME : Une analyse bibliométrique pour comprendre et agir. Revue Internationale P.M.E., 36(2), 6–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119762. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Sobral-Souza, T., Stropp, J., Santos, J. P., Prasniewski, V. M., Szinwelski, N., Vilela, B., Freitas, A. V. L., Ribeiro, M. C., & Hortal, J. (2021). Knowledge gaps hamper understanding the relationship between fragmentation and biodiversity loss: The case of Atlantic Forest fruit-feeding butterflies. PeerJ, 9, e11673. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11673 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Sopamena, C. A. (2024). Digital revolution and public administration innovation: Increasing the efficiency and responsiveness of public services. Journal of Governance: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, 9(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Srour, C. K. G. E. K., Kheir-El-Din, A., & Samir, Y. M. (2020). The effect of green transformational leadership on organizational citizenship behavior in Egypt. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 9(5), 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Stelter, A., Kaping, C., Oschinsky, F. M., & Niehaves, B. (2020). Theoretical foundations on technology acceptance and usage in public administrations: Investigating bounded acceptance and usage of new technology by employees. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 344–345). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Su, W., & Hahn, J. (2025). Achieving employee green performance through green transformational leadership: A multilevel study of chemical organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 46(2), 269–284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Sun, Q., Li, Y., & Hong, A. (2024). Integrating ESG into corporate strategy: Unveiling the moderating effect of digital transformation on green innovation through employee insights. Systems, 12(5), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12050148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Sverdlik, N., Oreg, S., Paine, J. W., & Seo, M.-G. (2024). Activation and valence in responses to organizational change: Development and validation of the change response circumplex scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(1), 135–155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Sverdlik, A., Oreg, S., & Vakola, M. (2023). Acceptance of change: A multidimensional construct. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(4), 567–589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Taamallah, A., Khemaja, M., & Faiz, S. (2019). The smart city of Tunisia. In A. Vesco & F. Ferrero (Eds.), Smart city emergence: Cases from around the world (pp. 421–433). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. Tai, J. C. F., Wang, E. T. G., & Wang, K. (2017). Investigating the impact of IT ambidexterity on digital innovation capability. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2017) (Paper 32). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Thiétart, R. A. (2014). Méthodes de recherche en management (4e éd.). Dunod. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Turan Torun, B. (2023). The effects of green transformational leadership on the green behaviour of business, the environment and the green performance. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University the Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 61, 31–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Umair, S., Waqas, U., Mrugalska, B., Shamsi, I. R., & Bystrov, I. (2024). Mediating role of green talent management between green strategic orientation and sustainable supply chain performance among SMEs of Oman. Sustainability, 16, 947. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. Van der Voet, J. (2014). The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure. European Management Journal, 32(3), 373–382. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. Van der Voet, J. (2015). Change leadership and public sector organizational change. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(6), 752–768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. Verplanken, B., & Orbell, S. (2019). Habit and behavior change. In K. Sassenberg & M. L. W. Vliek (Eds.), Social psychology in action (pp. 65–78). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. Vveinhardt, J., & Sedziuvienė, N. (2022). Acceptance of change by reducing employee resistance and strengthening organizational commitment. Journal of Management Studies, 26(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Wahba, S., Al Asrag, A., Hassan, A., & Abdel Majeed, A. (2024). Green dynamic capabilities and green creativity in hospitality and tourism industry: The moderating role of green transformational leadership. Journal of Association of Arab Universities for Tourism and Hospitality. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Wang, S., & Esperança, J. P. (2023). Can digital transformation improve market and ESG performance? Evidence from Chinese SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419, 137980. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. Waqas, U., Umair, S., Mrugalska, B., Shamsi, I. R., & Bystrov, I. (2024). Mediating role of green talent management between green strategic orientation and sustainable supply chain performance among SMEs of Oman. Annals of Operations Research, 340(2), 1063–1089. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

112. Wiesböck, F. (2019). Innovating in a digital world – The role of digital product innovation capabilities. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden, June 8–14, 2019. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2019_rp/46 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

113. Wilden, R., Devinney, T. M., & Dowling, G. R. (2016). The architecture of dynamic capability research: Identifying the building blocks of a configurational approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 997–1076. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

114. World Bank. (2022). Digital innovation towards sustainable public sector administration in Africa. In Digital transformation in Africa (pp. 149–168). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

115. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177–195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

116. Yu, H., & Xucan, N. (2024). Embracing change: How enterprise digital transformation drives green technology innovation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377225320_Embracing_Change_How_Enterprise_Digital_Transformation_Drives_Green_Technology_Innovation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

117. Zhang, T. (2024). Balancing digital innovation and traditional managerial practices for sustainable competitive advantage. Management Decision, 62(3), 789–805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study