Urban-Rural Disparity in Lung Function among Adolescents in Lucknow, India: A Cross-Sectional Study on Air Pollution Exposure
Authors
Research Scholar, Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya (India)
Associate Professor, Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University (India)
Assistant Professor, Department of physical education, University of Lucknow, Lucknow (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100093
Subject Category: Physical Education
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 1145-1153
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-30
Accepted: 2026-01-04
Published: 2026-01-23
Abstract
Background: Air pollution is a major environmental health concern in rapidly urbanizing regions of India, with growing evidence that chronic exposure adversely affects respiratory health. Adolescents are particularly vulnerable, as lung growth and maturation continue during this critical developmental period. Urban environments typically exhibit higher levels of ambient air pollution compared to rural areas, potentially leading to disparities in lung function among adolescents.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare lung function parameters among urban and rural adolescents in Lucknow, India, and to examine the association between environmental exposure and respiratory health outcomes.
Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted among 50 school-going adolescents aged 10–16 years, including 25 participants each from urban and rural areas of Lucknow. Spirometric measurements— Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV₁), and the FEV₁/FVC ratio—were assessed using standardized spirometry protocols. Descriptive statistics were computed, and inferential analyses included independent samples t-tests, chi-square tests for prevalence comparison, and Pearson correlation analysis to examine associations between lung function and anthropometric variables.
Results: Rural adolescents demonstrated significantly higher mean values of FVC, FEV₁, and FEV₁/FVC ratio compared to their urban counterparts (p < 0.001). The prevalence of lung function impairment (FEV₁ < 80% predicted) was substantially higher in the urban group (32%) than in the rural group (11%), with the difference being statistically significant (χ² = 12.57, p < 0.001). Strong positive correlations between height and lung function parameters were observed in both groups, confirming physiological consistency.
Conclusions: The findings indicate significant urban–rural disparities in adolescent lung function, with poorer respiratory outcomes among urban adolescents. These results suggest that chronic exposure to higher levels of ambient air pollution in urban settings may impair lung growth and function. The study highlights the urgent need for targeted public health interventions, improved air quality control, and school-based respiratory health screening programs to protect adolescent lung health.
Keywords
Air pollution; Lung function; Adolescents; Urban–rural comparison; Spirometry
Downloads
References
1. Balakrishnan, K. et al. (2013). The impact of household air pollution on health in India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Gauderman, W. J. et al. (2015). Association of improved air quality with lung development in children. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Gupta, A. et al. (2020). Air pollution exposure and respiratory health in urban India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. McConnell, R. et al. (2018). Physical activity, air pollution, and lung function in children. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Pope, C. A., & Dockery, D. W. (2006). Health effects of fine particulate air pollution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. WHO (2021). Air pollution and child health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Quanjer, P. H., et al. (2012). Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. European Respiratory Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Schraufnagel, D. E., et al. (2019). Air pollution and noncommunicable diseases. Chest. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. World Health Organization. (2021). Global air quality guidelines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Gauderman, W. J., et al. (2015). Association of improved air quality with lung development in children. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. New England Journal of Medicine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Gupta, A., et al. (2020). Air pollution exposure and respiratory health in urban India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. McConnell, R., et al. (2018). Physical activity, air pollution, and lung function. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. • Pope, C. A., & Dockery, D. W. (2006). Health effects of fine particulate air pollution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. • Schraufnagel, D. E., et al. (2019). Air pollution and noncommunicable diseases. Chest. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Combined and Isolated Effect of SAQ Training and Resistance Training on Agility and Flexibility among Badminton Players
- Importance of Ashtanga Yoga in Physical Education and Mental Health
- Navigating the Path of Exceptional Parenting: An Exploration of Experiences among Parents of Para-Athletes
- Effects of a 12-Week Football Intervention on Mental Health and Psychological Resilience in Secondary School Students
- Academic Achievement, Enthusiasm and Attitude of High School Students Regarding Quizizz as an Educational Gamification Tool for Physics