The Construction of Non-Formal Education: Philosophy Analysis in Ivan Illich’s Perspectives

This study examines the construction of non-formal education (NFE) through the philosophical perspective of Ivan Illich, particularly his critique of institutionalized schooling as articulated in Deschooling Society. Amid growing concerns regarding the limitations of formal education, such as standardization, credentialism, commodification, and the reproduction of social inequality, non-formal education has emerged as a viable alternative that emphasizes flexibility, learner autonomy, and community engagement. This research employs a literature review approach by systematically identifying, screening, and synthesizing scholarly works addressed to non-formal education and Illich’s de-schooling philosophy. From an initial pool of 45 relevant publications, 26 articles were selected based on explicit thematic relevance, analytical depth, and alignment with the study’s objectives. The findings indicate that Illich’s critique reveals the exclusionary and monopolistic tendencies of formal schooling, particularly its dependence on credentials and institutional authority. Nonformal education responds to these challenges by promoting constructivist and liberal educational principles that prioritize active participation, self-directed learning, and contextual relevance. Furthermore, empirical and pragmatic perspectives highlight the role of community-based learning, participatory governance, and lifelong learning frameworks in strengthening the implementation of non-formal education. This study concludes that Ivan Illich’s philosophical ideas remain highly relevant in contemporary educational discourse, particularly in addressing educational inequality and fostering more democratic, inclusive, and human-centered learning systems.

Non-formal education; deschooling society; Ivan Illich; philosophy of education; lifelong learning

1. Apple, M. W. (2019). Ideology and Curriculum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ball, S. J. (2017). The education debate, third edition. In The Education Debate, Third Edition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Biesta, G. J. J. (2015). Beyond Learning: democratic education for a human future. beyond learning: democratic education for a human future, 1–171. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315635811/beyondlearning-gert-biesta/rights-and-permissions [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bourdieu, P. ., & Passeron, J.-C. . (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Revised edition. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bruno‐jofré, J. I. Z. R. (2012). Ivan Illich’s Late Critique of Deschooling Society: “I Was Largely Barking Up the Wrong Tree.” Educational Theory, 62(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.2012.62.issue-5 Coombs, p. h., & Ahmed, m. (1974). How nonformal education can help. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dankunprasert, S., Cojorn, K., Sonsupap, K., Choompunuch, B., Ranmechai, S., Nonsuwan, A., & Tongron, Y. (2025). Bridging knowledge and community: Innovative community-based learning to strengthen mathematics pre-service teachers’ problem-solving competency. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(10). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17179 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. EDU | OECD. (n.d.). Retrieved November 16, 2025, from https://www.oecd.org/en/about/directorates/directorate-for-education-and-skills.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Freire, Paulo., Freire, A. M. A., & Barr, R. R. (2013). Pedagogy of hope : reliving Pedagogy of the oppressed. 215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Giroux, H. (2021). Critical Pedagogy. In handbuch bildungs- und erziehungssoziologie (pp. 1–16). springer fachmedien wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31395-1_19-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Grazia Viloba, m. m. (2024). a radical critique of modern education: a review of “deschooling society” by ivan illich. european journal of alternative education studies, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v6i2.5666 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hanlin, L. (2015). Book Review: Powerful Techniques for Teaching Adults by Brookfield, S. D. Adult Learning, 26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159515594149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hoppers, W. H. M. L. (2006). Non-formal education and basic education reform : a conceptual review. International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Igelmo Zaldívar, J. (2015). Deschooling for all? The thought of Ivan Illich in the era of education (and learning) for all. Foro de Educación, 13(18). https://doi.org/10.14516/FDE.2015.013.018.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Illich, Ivan. (19881971). Deschooling society. 181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Johnson, M., & Majewska, D. (2024a). What is non-formal learning (and how do we know it when we see it)? A pilot study report. Discover Education, 3(1), 148-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S44217-024-00255Y/TABLES/3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Johnson, M., & Majewska, D. (2024b). What is non-formal learning (and how do we know it when we see it)? A pilot study report. Discover Education, 3(1), 148-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S44217-024-00255Y/TABLES/3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFSOF.2008.09.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Knowles, M. (2005). groleau_Andragogy_in_Action. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. La Belle, T. J. (1982). Formal, nonformal and informal education: A holistic perspective on lifelong learning. International Review of Education, 28(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00598444/metrics [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. nowell, l. s., norris, j. m., white, d. e., & moules, n. j. (2017). thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. international journal of qualitative methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847/asset/e3e580c8-af29-4f8e-a810d37473eeee85/assets/images/large/10.1177_1609406917733847-fig4.jpg [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing Education Policy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rogers, Alan. (2005). Non-formal education : flexible schooling or participatory education? Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong ; Kluwer Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Suve, P. (2024). Literature Review as a Research Method in Scopus-Indexed Police Journals: a Scoping Review. Internal Security, 15(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.4561 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Teräs, M. (2022). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. International Review of Education, 68(4), 635–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11159-022-09971-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Unesco. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap Education for Sustainable Development A roadmap. https://doi.org/10.54675/YFRE1448 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study