Barriers to Accessing Multidisciplinary Team Services for Learners with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities at the One Stop Centre of Livingstone University Teaching Hospital, Southern Province of Zambia

Children with learning and special educational needs and disabilities (LSEND) require coordinated multidisciplinary services to achieve early identification, timely intervention, and sustainable continuity of care. Although one-stop, co-located multidisciplinary models seek to reduce fragmentation and caregiver burden, evidence from low- and middle-income countries indicates that co-location alone is insufficient unless referral pathways, internal coordination, and follow-up mechanisms are functional. This qualitative descriptive study examined barriers to accessing multidisciplinary team (MDT) services at the One Stop Centre of Livingstone University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), Southern Province, Zambia. Eighteen purposively selected participants were interviewed individually, including 2 nurses, 2 special-education teachers, 2 police officers, 2 caregivers, 2 physiotherapists, 2 psychologists, an occupational therapist, 2 paediatricians, 2 social workers, a psychiatrist, and 2 learners with special educational needs were interviewed with parents present. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed manually using inductive thematic analysis with two independent coders, consensus meetings, peer debriefing, and member checking. Findings are presented mapped to an operationalized continuum of care entry, internal navigation, intervention capacity, follow-up/referral-out, and post-visit continuity and illustrate how barriers at each stage undermine access and sustained engagement. Key constraints included ineffective referral and low awareness at entry; poor internal coordination and information flow; shortages of trained specialists and equipment limiting intervention capacity; weak follow-up and outbound referral systems; and transport costs, stigma, and caregiver psychological burden that undermine post-visit continuity. The paper concludes with pragmatic, evidence-grounded recommendations to strengthen processes and supports at LUTH so the One Stop Centre can fulfil its potential as an accessible MDT hub for LSEND in Livingstone and Zambia at large.

LSEND; multidisciplinary team; one-stop centre; access barriers

1. Adebayo, A., & Kola, T. (2020). Accessibility gaps in multidisciplinary health services for children with disabilities in resource‑limited settings. African Journal of Disability, 9(1), Article 1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ainscow, M., & Messiou, K. (2018). Engaging with the views of students to promote inclusion in education. Journal of Educational Change, 19(1), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abu‑Hamour, B. (2022). Barriers to effective multidisciplinary collaboration in disability services: A systemic review of structural and communication challenges. International Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Banda, F., & Mweemba, L. (2021). Resource constraints in Zambian public hospitals and implications for child developmental assessments. Zambia Medical Journal, 48(2), 67–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chanda, J., & Mutombo, L. (2022). Parental experiences with early intervention services for children with special needs in Zambia. African Journal of Social Work, 12(1), 30–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(4), 16–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of qualitative descriptive methods in health research. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19(1), 123–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hlongwane, M., & Mkhize, M. (2019). Multidisciplinary collaboration in child disability assessment centres in South Africa: Barriers and facilitators. South African Journal of Child Health, 13(3), 101–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jones, K., & Reynolds, D. (2019). Coordination challenges in multidisciplinary teams providing developmental services. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(12), 1499–1508. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kamanga, P., & Chirwa, M. (2020). Transportation and access barriers for families seeking paediatric rehabilitation services in Zambia. Medical Journal of Zambia, 47(3), 140–148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kusi, H., & Opong, E. (2019). Understanding family engagement in special education: Insights from parents of children with disabilities. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(4), 295–303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mhlongo, S., & Pillay, R. (2021). Communication breakdowns in hospital‑based multidisciplinary teams: Implications for continuity of care. BMC Health Services Research, 21, Article 112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ngugi, P., & Kariuki, S. (2021). Integrating education and health services for children with disabilities in Kenya: A multidisciplinary approach. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 68(4), 456–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Phiri, T., & Mwape, B. (2023). Caregiver satisfaction with multidisciplinary child disability services in Zambia. African Journal of Disability, 12(1), Article 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Simui, F., et al. (2022). [Insert full citation regarding specialist service concentration in Zambia please replace with journal/report details]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tafida, S., & Umar, A. (2020). Delays in paediatric disability assessment: An evaluation of service barriers in Nigerian tertiary hospitals. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 23(5), 665–671. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. UNICEF & World Health Organization. (2010). Guidelines on one‑stop centres for child protection and integrated services. UNICEF/WHO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Villamin, E., Lopez, R., Thapa, S., & Cleary, M. (2024). Qualitative descriptive design in health research: Practical considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, Article 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. World Health Organization. (2021). Global report on disability and rehabilitation services. WHO Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study