Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Journal Article Writing Among Postgraduate Students at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)

This study examined postgraduate students’ adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in academic writing at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). The results indicated a moderate to high level of familiarity and daily engagement with AI, influenced by deadlines, peer interactions, and institutional training. Various tools were utilized, including ChatGPT, Copilot, Grammarly, QuillBot, and Mendeley. Students frequently recognized drafting and editing as the most beneficial phases, during which AI improved clarity, organization, vocabulary, and confidence. The benefits included increased efficiency, scaffolding support, and lower stress levels, while the challenges included fabricated references, inaccurate summaries, the risk of plagiarism, and a potential loss of academic voice. Guided by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this conceptual paper reviewed literature on students’ acceptance of AI-assisted academic writing tools and conducted a qualitative study with six postgraduate students from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). The importance of maintaining an ethical and pedagogical balance was highlighted, with AI positioned as a supportive tool that necessitates supervisory oversight and validation against peer-reviewed materials. AI literacy evolved gradually, transitioning from initial scepticism to a greater appreciation, shaped by peer influence, institutional exposure, and practical requirements. In summary, students viewed AI as a collaborative partner that enhanced productivity but required careful scrutiny to maintain originality and academic integrity. This highlights the necessity for well-defined institutional policies that direct the responsible use of AI in postgraduate research settings. Effective supervisory oversight and validation against peer-reviewed sources are crucial to maintain authenticity and avert misuse. Fostering critical digital literacy among students will guarantee that AI serves as a supportive ally, enhancing academic rigor while upholding originality and ethical principles.

Artificial Intelligence, Journal Writing, Technology Acceptance Model, Postgraduate Students

1. Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews. In K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, & J. S. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (pp. 492–505). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adamakis, M., & Rachiotis, T. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A State-of-the-Art Overview of Pedagogical Integrity, AI Literacy, and Policy Integration. Encyclopedia,5(4),180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmad, A. A. E., et al. (2025). Understanding Student Perception Regarding the Use of ChatGPT in Argumentative Writing: A Qualitative Inquiry. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anani, G. E., Nyamekye, E., & Bafour-Koduah, D. (2025). Using artificial intelligence for academic writing in higher education: the perspectives of university students in Ghana. Discover Education, 4(46). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Reflections and Recommendations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Baharum, N. D., Aziz, R. A., & Awang, S. (2025). Malaysian ESL Learners’ Perceptions of WAAT Implementation in Academic Writing Using TAM. UiTM Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cheng, A., Calhoun, A., & Reedy, G. (2025). Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: recommendations for ethical use. BMC Medical Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Das, P. D., & Chen, Y. (2025). The Role of AI in Academic Writing: Impacts on Writing Skills, Critical Thinking, and Integrity in Higher Education. Societies, 15(9), 247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Deep, P. D., & Chen, Y. (2025). The Role of AI in Academic Writing: Impacts on Writing Skills, Critical Thinking, and Integrity. Societies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Esmaeil, A. A. A., et al. (2025). AI Tools and Postgraduate Academic Writing Practices. UKM Research Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Falebita, O. A., & Kok, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence–assisted academic writing: Effects on learner confidence and feedback responsiveness. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 27(2), 89–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gao, X., Li, Y., Chen, W., & Huang, R. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in academic research: Opportunities, risks, and ethical challenges. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hazari, S. (2024). Justification and Roadmap for Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy Courses in Higher Education. ERIC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Huang, B., & Yang, Y. (2025). Revisiting the Technology Acceptance Models: A Critical Evaluation and Their Educational Applications. AJESS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Janghorban, R., Roudsari, R. L., & Taghipour, A. (2014). Skype Interviewing: The New Generation of Online Synchronous Interview in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9(1), 24152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Jeyaraj, J. J. (2020). Academic Writing Needs of Postgraduate Research Students in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., et al. (2023). A survey of hallucination in natural language generation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Joseph, J. J. (2025). It’s A Jungle Out There: Challenges in Postgraduate Research Writing. GEMA Online Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangas, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kassim, Z. S., & Maniam, M. (2025). Language Proficiency of TESL Students in a Malaysian Public Education University. IJARBSS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A Meta-Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kurniati, E. Y., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Quillbot Utilization in English Academic Writing Class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Li, H., & Wu, X. (2025). The use of generative AI tools in academic writing: A systematic review. AI and Ethics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Luo, T., Xie, Q., & Zhang, M. (2025). Understanding technology adoption in higher education: The role of usability and interface simplicity in AI tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(1), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10389-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Pandya, K. (2025). Ethical Challenges of Generative AI in Academic Writing. International Journal of Scientific Advances in Technology (IJSAT). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Singh, M. K. M. (2019). Academic Reading and Writing Challenges Among International EFL Master’s Students in a Malaysian University. Journal of International Students. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Springer. (2025). Cultivating AI Literacy in Higher Education Students: A Four-Step Framework. In AI in Higher Education Institutions [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Vasic, M. (2025). The Misuse of AI in Academic Writing: Fabricated Citations and Sources in Student Papers. Journal of Academic Integrity and Research Ethics, 12(4), 45–58 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Xue, L., Mahat, H., Ghazali, N., & Shi, Y. (2025). AI adoption in higher education: Extending TAM with ethical and contextual factors. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 38(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zakaria, N. Y. K., Hashim, H., & Zaini, M. H. (2024). Exploring the Postgraduate Students’ Challenges and Needs in Learning Academic Writing. IJARBSS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zhang, L., Wang, S., & Liu, H. (2025). AI-assisted writing tools and their impact on learner autonomy and critical language development. System, 118, 102965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.102965 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zuo, M., Sun, Y., & Zhao, K. (2025). Contextual determinants of student engagement with AI-supported learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 684–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13492 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study