Using MCQ-Based Assessments to Evaluate Students’ Comprehensive Understanding of course Content
Authors
Trincomalee Campus, Eastern University (Sri Lanka)
Trincomalee Campus, Eastern University (Sri Lanka)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100302
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 3863-3870
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-18
Accepted: 2026-01-23
Published: 2026-02-04
Abstract
Assessment methods play an important role in evaluating students’ understanding of course content and in supporting effective learning. In the Software Quality Assurance (SQA) course, the syllabus primarily comprises theoretical concepts covering a broad range of topics, including quality models, testing strategies, standards, and process improvement techniques. Traditionally, essay-type questions have been used as the primary method of assessment. However, this approach was found to evaluate only limited portions of the syllabus, as students often concentrated on selected topics based on anticipated examination questions. As a result, students’ overall understanding of the complete course content was not adequately assessed, despite their exposure to all chapters of the syllabus. To address this limitation, the existing essay-based assessment format was restructured into a multiple-choice question (MCQ)-based approach. The redesigned MCQs were systematically developed to cover nearly all sections of each chapter, thereby enabling broader representation of course content within a single assessment. This approach facilitated the evaluation of students’ factual knowledge, conceptual understanding, and basic application of key principles across the entire curriculum. The adoption of MCQ-based assessments was also intended to promote consistent engagement with all topics rather than selective learning. An analysis of student feedback and assessment outcomes indicates that the MCQ-based approach enhanced comprehensive syllabus coverage, improved objectivity through standardized grading, and increased consistency in evaluation. Furthermore, students reported increased motivation to study the entire course content due to the broader scope of assessment. Nevertheless, it was acknowledged that MCQs alone may be limited in assessing higher-order cognitive skills, such as critical thinking, synthesis, and in-depth analysis. Therefore, the continued use of MCQs is proposed to ensure comprehensive content coverage while effectively assessing students’ understanding of key concepts. This approach supports efficient and consistent evaluation of learning outcomes in theory-intensive courses such as Software Quality Assurance.
Keywords
Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs), Assessment Strategies, Software Quality Assurance, Comprehensive Content Coverage
Downloads
References
1. Gibbs, G. & Habeshaw, T. (1989). Preparing to Teach: An Introduction to Effective Teaching in Higher Education. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Honey, P. & Mumford, A. (1986). The Manual of Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Sri Lanka Qualifications Framework (SLQF), 2015. Ministry of Higher Education, Sri Lanka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 473-493. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Wiggins, G. (2012). Seven Keys to Effective Feedback. Educational Leadership, 70(1), pp.10-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Carter, M., & S. Kramp (2011). Enhancing communication skills through active learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Research, 15(2), 200-208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study