Optimizing Mathematical Accomplishment: Relationship with Motivation, Peer-Assisted Learning, Pedagogical Quality and Student Interest

Mathematics is a fundamental subject for all university students, irrespective of their field of study. This subject is essential for the cultivation of fundamental skills in a variety of fields, such as mathematical reasoning, critical thinking, and problem-solving. Nevertheless, the mathematical achievements of Malaysian university students have consistently been a source of concern. It is imperative to examine the factors that contribute to this issue in order to resolve it. The objective of this research is to investigate the factors that facilitate the optimisation of mathematical achievement among university students. The investigation specifically investigates the correlations between mathematical achievement and four critical variables: student interest, motivation, peer-assisted learning, and pedagogical quality. In order to accomplish this objective, quantitative data will be collected from a representative sample of university students who are enrolled in mathematics courses. The questionnaires will evaluate student interest, pedagogical quality, motivation, peer-assisted learning, and mathematical accomplishment. The data were collected through a random distribution of questionnaires to students at the UiTM Sabah branch who were taking a mathematics course. The data were organised and entered into SPSS for analysis. Descriptive and inferential statistics were implemented. The results suggest that the achievement of students in mathematics was substantially influenced by their motivation, peer-assisted learning, pedagogical quality, and interest. Additionally, this research contributes to advancing effective instructional techniques and interventions that improve students' mathematical performance. Furthermore, this investigation enhances the body of knowledge regarding the influence of motivation, peer-assisted learning, pedagogical quality, and student interest on the optimisation of mathematical achievement, which will have substantial implications for educational policy and practice.

Mathematical Achievement, Pedagogical Quality, Peer-Assisted Learning

1. Ambussaidi, I.; Yang, Y.F. The impact of mathematics teacher quality on student achievement in Oman and Taiwan. Int. J. Educ. Learn. 2019, 1, 50–62 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Appiah, J. B., Korkor, S., Arthur, Y. D., & Obeng, B. A. (2022). Mathematics achievement in high schools, the role of the teacher-student relationship, students’ self-efficacy, and students’ perception of mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0688. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12056. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arthur, Y. D., Dogbe, C. S. K., & Asiedu-Addo, S. K. (2022). Enhancing Performance in Mathematics Through Motivation, Peer Assisted Learning, And Teaching Quality: The Mediating Role of Student Interest. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(2), em2072. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11509 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Azmidar, A., Darhim, D., & Dahlan, J. (2017). Enhancing students’ interest through mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cook, D.A.; Artino, A.R. Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Med Educ. 2016, 50, 997–1014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davadas, S. D. & Lay, Y. F. (2017). Factors Affecting Students’ Attitude towards Mathematics: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 517-529. https://doi.org/10.12973/EJMSTE/80356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Elshami, W., Abuzaid, M., & Abdalla, M. E. (2020). Radiography students’ perceptions of peer-assisted learning. Radiography, 26(2), e109-e113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Emaikwu, S. O. (2011). Assessment of the impact of students’ mode of admission into university and their academic achievement in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 1(3), 151-164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Etikan, I., & Babtope, O. (2019). A basic approach in sampling methodology and sample size calculation. Med Life Clin, 1(2), 1006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Phillips, N. B., Hamlett, C. L., & Earns, K. (1995). Acquisition and Transfer Effects of Classwide Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies in Mathematics for Students with Varying Learning Histories. School Psychology Review, 24(4), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1995.12085790 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. J. León, E. Medina-Garrido, and M. Ortega Viera, “Teaching quality: high school students' autonomy and competence,” Psicothema, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 218–223, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Khine, M. S., Al-Mutawah, M., & Afari, E. (2015). Determinants of affective factors in mathematics achievement: Structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(2), 199-211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. M. R. Ilias & A. N. M Basir. Factors Influencing Values of Mathematics Among Mathematics Students in Tertiary Level. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 4, p. 46-56, jan. 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Maaminm M., Maat, S. M., & Iksan, Z. H. (2021). Analysis of the factors that influence mathematics achievement in the ASEAN countries Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 16(1), 371 – 388. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i1.5535 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mamites, I., Almerino, P., Sitoy, R., Atibing, N. M., Almerino, J. G., Cebe, D., Ybañez, R., Tandag, J., Villaganas, M. A., Lumayag, C., Plando, D., Añero, M., Acebes, H. M., Maturan, F., Evangelista, S. S., Aro, J. L., Himang, C., & Ocampo, L. (2022). Factors Influencing Teaching Quality in Universities: Analyzing Causal Relationships Based on Neutrosophic DEMATEL. Education Research International, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9475254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Meke, K. D. P., Jailani, J., Wutsqa, D. U., & Alfi, H. D. (2019). Problem based learning using manipulative materials to improve student interest of mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 032099. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-6596/1157/3/032099 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Okereke, S. C. (2006). Effect of proper knowledge of implications of mathematical tasks/ concepts to career types and gender n students’ achievement, interest, and retention. U. Nzewi (Ed) STAN proceedings of the 47th annual conferences, 253-259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Postareff, L., Mattsson, M., & Parpala, A. (2018). The effect of perceptions of the teaching-learning environment on the variation in approaches to learning-between-student differences and within-student variation. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. R. Singh and S. Sarkar, “Does teaching quality matter? Students learning outcome related to teaching quality in public and private primary schools in India,” International Journal of Educational Development, vol. 41, pp. 153–163, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Salifu, A. S., & Bakari, A. (2022). Exploring the Relationship Between Students’ Perception, Interest and Mathematics Achievement. Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 6(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.30935/mjosbr/11491. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Santhanalakshmi, P. C., & Naomi, P. G. V. (2021). Impact of peer assisted learning strategy (PALS) for learning enhancement of students at secondary level. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(10), 7333-7336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Siraj, H., Syed, A. R., & Sultan, M. F. (2021). SMS advertising & its impact on consumer purchase intention: A comparative study of adults and young consumers in Pakistan. Journal of Marketing Strategies, 3(2), 1-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tokan, M. K., & Imakulata, M. M. (2019). The effect of motivation and learning behaviour on student achievement. South African Journal of Education, 39(1), 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wallace, T. L., Kelcey, B., & Ruzek, E. (2016). What Can Student Perception Surveys Tell Us About Teaching? Empirically Testing the Underlying Structure of the Tripod Student Perception Survey. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1834–1868. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216671864 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wood, T., Mazzocco, M. M. M., Calhoon, M. B., Crowe, E. C., & Connor, C. M. (2020). The Effect of Peer-Assisted Mathematics Learning Opportunities in First Grade Classrooms: What Works for Whom? Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(4), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2020.1772422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Y. D. Arthur, S. K. Appiah, K. Amo-Asante, and B. Asare, "Modeling student’s interest in mathematics: Role of history of mathematics, peer-assisted learning, and student’s perception," EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18(10), 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Yusof, N. M., Karim, Z. A., Rashid, R. A., & Mohamed, Z. (2019). Factors Affecting Students’ Achievement in Mathematics: Case Study in Terengganu. Jurnal Intelek, 14(2), 198 – 207. https://doi.org/10.24191/ji.v14i2.235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study