Curriculum Sustainability in Digital-Age Multilingual Education: A Teacher-Centred Evaluation

Digital transformation challenges language curriculum sustainability in multilingual societies where national languages must balance heritage preservation with global communication demands. This study evaluates Malay Language curriculum sustainability and transferability in Malaysian primary schools from teachers' perspectives, addressing how heritage language curricula remain relevant amid digital disruption and whether curriculum-acquired competencies transfer beyond classroom contexts. Utilizing the CIPP Model's product dimension, this qualitative case study involved six teachers from five primary schools across diverse geographical contexts in Sarawak. Semi-structured interviews and systematic observations were analyzed through thematic analysis with rigorous quality assurance protocols. Findings reveal critical sustainability challenges including the "rojak language" phenomenon involving extensive code-mixing, technological infrastructure disparities creating educational equity concerns, and generational technology adoption divides. Only 70% of curriculum content was deemed sustainable, with infrastructure constraints particularly affecting rural schools. The curriculum demonstrated strong transferability potential through modular design yet revealed register confusion and economic transferability concerns reflecting tensions between heritage language education and English-dominated professional contexts. This research establishes empirical evidence for interconnected sustainability and transferability factors, contributing dynamic assessment frameworks for digital-age curriculum evaluation. Findings inform strategic interventions including infrastructure investment, comprehensive teacher professional development, and reconceptualized assessment frameworks evaluating multimodal communication competencies while maintaining linguistic diversity.

curriculum sustainability, multilingual education, teacher perspectives

1. Adnan, M., Abidin, S. Z., Hashim, H., & Mohd Adnan, A. H. (2018). Teachers' workload capacity in the implementation of standard-based assessment system in Malaysian primary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(14), 745-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i14/3654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alharbi, M. S. (2025). Digital transformation and EFL anxiety: A mixed-methods study on the impact of online learning on the language acquisition psychology of Saudi Arabian students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, Article 101721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101721 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aybek, B., & Oğuz, O. (2025). Sustainable and Inclusive Education Reform in Türkiye: A Cipp Evaluation of the Primary Turkish Language Curriculum. Sustainability, 17(19), 8659. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198659 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. BERNAMA. (2025, Oktober 8). KPT laksana pendekatan penting jamin kedudukan Bahasa Melayu dalam era kecerdasan buatan. https://www.bernama.com/bm/news.php?id=2476586 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brown, C. (2024). Role of the English teaching hidden curriculum in sustainability education: the case of Japan. Environmental Education Research, 30, 1211 - 1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2309583. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chew, F. P., & Zulhazmi Hamad. (2018). Kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan Bahasa Melayu melalui teknik penyoalan. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 8(1), 1-12. https://journalarticle.ukm.my/11831/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gorter, D., & Cenoz, J. (2017). Language education policy and multilingual assessment. Language and Education, 31, 231 - 248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1261892. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hassan Ahmad. (2015). Bahasa Melayu dan pembentukan jati diri nasional. Institut Terjemahan dan Buku Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Husnaini, H. (2025). Navigating challenges and strategies in implementing The Independent Curriculum: A multi-site case study of English language instruction in junior and senior high schools in Palopo. Linguistics Initiative. https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.51263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kalai Selvan Arumugham. (2020). Kurikulum, pengajaran dan pentaksiran dari perspektif pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah. Asian People Journal, 3(1), 152-161. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2020.3.1.175 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kana, R., Aaron, S. J., & Juky, S. (2025). Keberkesanan dan impak penggunaan teknologi kecerdasan buatan dalam pengajaran kemahiran literasi Bahasa Melayu bagi murid Iban di sekolah rendah luar bandar di Daerah Kapit [The effectiveness and impact of using artificial intelligence in teaching Malay literacy skills for Iban students in Kapit district at rural primary school]. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 15(1), 49-59. https://spaj.ukm.my/jpbm/index.php/jpbm/article/view/397 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2022). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (DSKP). Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kusmayadi, Y., Sondarika, W., Brata, Y. R., & Ramdani, S. (2025). Designing A Culture-Based Learning Model for Sustainability: Regional Contextualization Using SEA-PLM Indicators in Indonesia and Malaysia. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(4), 5755-5772. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i4.8812 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lau, S. Y. W., Lambri, A., & Kiting, R. (2020). Penguasaan kemahiran membaca Bahasa Melayu murid bukan penutur jati di Bintulu, Sarawak. EDUCATUM – Journal of Social Science (EJOSS), 6(1), 33-42. https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/EJOSS/article/view/3449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Marsh, C. J., & Willis, G. (2007). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues (4th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nurul Hasna Hassan, Zaharah Hussin, Saedah Siraj, Ahmad Arifin Sapar, & Zawawi Ismail. (2019). Kemahiran berfikir kritis dalam buku teks Bahasa Melayu kurikulum standard sekolah rendah tahap II. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 7(1), 18-27. https://juku.um.edu.my/article/view/17501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nurul Huda, M., & Anuar, M. (2022). Kesediaan guru dalam melaksanakan pentaksiran bilik darjah di sekolah rendah. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 14(1), 87-99. https://www.icbe.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Manuscript-ICBE-Nurul-Huda-1-2.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2017). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Osawaru, O., & Unachukwu, C. (2024). Transforming French language education through multilingual curriculum development: Innovative strategies for culturally inclusive and adaptive learning. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i12.1766. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Othman, I., Ahmad, M., & Esa, M. (2022). EMPOWERING THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THE MALAY LANGUAGE AS A COMMUNICATION TRANSMISSION AND ELEMENT OF IDENTITY. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management. https://doi.org/10.35631/jthem.729016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Provus, M. (1973). Discrepancy evaluation model. McCutchan Publishing Corporation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Reid, J., & O'Leary, E. (2025). Teacher perspectives on curriculum selection, quality, and use in public preschool classrooms. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, Advance online publication, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2024.2442434 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sowell, E. J. (2000). Curriculum: An integrative introduction (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 5(1), 19-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models and applications. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Torsh, H. I. (2025). The digital shift in parental strategies for heritage language maintenance. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2025.2491607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. WadahDBP. (2025, Oktober 19). Penggunaan pedagogi digital dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran bahasa Melayu. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. https://wadahdbp.my/titisan-pena/penggunaan-pedagogi-digital-dalam- pengajaran-dan-pembelajaran-bahasa-melayu/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Yahya, F., & Yusof, N. (2017). Implementing science curriculum in teacher training college: Science lecturers' perspective. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 7(2), 19-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study